Visual mental imagery and verbal working memory: evidence from consecutive interpreting

References

• Arumí Ribas, M. (2012). Problems and strategies in consecutive interpreting: A pilot study at two different stages of interpreter training. Meta, 57(3), 812–835. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017092ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auvinen-Lintunen, L., Ilonen, T., Kieseppä, T., Suvisaari, J., & Lindgren, M. (2022). Mental imagery in early psychosis. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 41(3), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366211021762
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagri, G., & Jones, G. V. (2018). The role of first person perspective and vivid imagery in memory for written narratives. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1431522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems and emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–609; discussion 612-613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99252144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, G. H., & Gaunitz, S. C. B. (1979). Self-rated imagery and encoding strategies in visual memory. British Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb02137.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buckner, R. L., & Wheeler, M. E. (2001). The cognitive neuroscience of remembering. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, R., Dong, Y., Zhao, N., & Lin, J. (2015). Factors contributing to individual differences in the development of consecutive interpreting competence for beginner student interpreters. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2015.1016279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chara, P. J., & Hamm, D. A. (1989). An inquiry into the construct validity of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.69.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, I., Liu, K., & Zhao, N. (2021). Effects of directionality on interpreting performance: Evidence from interpreting between Chinese and English by trainee interpreters. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. H., & Saslona, M. (1990). The advantage of being an habitual visualizer. Journal of Mental Imagery, 14(3–4), 101–112. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-17445-001
   Google Scholar
• Collard, C., Przybyl, H., & Defrancq, B. (2018). Interpreting into an SOV language: Memory and the position of the verb. A corpus-based comparative study of interpreted and non-mediated speech. Meta, 63(3), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.7202/1060169ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Jeter, C. B., Yang, D., Montague, P. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2007). Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Research, 47(4), 474–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beni, R., & Moè, A. (2003). Imagery and rehearsal as study strategies for written or orally presented passages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 975–980. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickel, M. J., & Slak, S. (1983). Imagery vividness and memory for verbal material. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7(1), 121–125. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-14121-001
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016). Classes in translating and interpreting produce differential gains in switching and updating. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(AUG), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong, Y., Liu, Y., & Cai, R. (2018). How does consecutive interpreting training influence working memory: A longitudinal study of potential links between the two. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JUN), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong, Y., & Xie, Z. (2014). Contributions of second language proficiency and interpreting experience to cognitive control differences among young adult bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.924951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Hartwig, M. K., Rawson, K. A., & Lipko, A. R. (2011). Improving college students’ evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.502239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberman, C., & McKelvie, S. J. (2002). Vividness of visual imagery and source memory for audio and text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles of mental imagery. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floridou, G. A., Peerdeman, K. J., & Schaefer, R. S. (2022). Individual differences in mental imagery in different modalities and levels of intentionality. Memory & Cognition, 50(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01209-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M. A., Wozniak, K. H., & Gillum, A. (2006). Imagination and false memory inductions: Investigating the role of process, content and source of imaginations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(9), 1119–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulford, J., Milton, F., Salas, D., Smith, A., Simler, A., Winlove, C., & Zeman, A. (2018). The neural correlates of visual imagery vividness – An fMRI study and literature review. Cortex, 105, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieshoff, A. C., & Albl-Mikasa, M. (2022). Interpreting accuracy revisited: A refined approach to interpreting performance analysis. Perspectives, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2022.2088296
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, A. (2019). Consecutive interpreting: A short course. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. (1949). An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 39(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1949.tb00215.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, P., & Macleod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulyás, E., Gombos, F., Sütöri, S., Lovas, A., Ziman, G., & Kovács, I. (2022). Visual imagery vividness declines across the lifespan. Cortex, 154, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur, R. C., & Hilgard, E. R. (1975). Visual imagery and the discrimination of differences between altered pictures simultaneously and successively presented. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01470.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halpern, A. R. (2015). Differences in auditory imagery self-report predict neural and behavioral outcomes. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 25(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000081
   Google Scholar
• Hanggi, D. (1989). Differential aspects of visual short and long-term memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541448908403089
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2018). Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1212–1219. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1347-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herholz, S. C., Halpern, A. R., & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). Neuronal correlates of perception, imagery, and memory for familiar tunes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1382–1397. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianì, F. (2019). Embodied memories: Reviewing the role of the body in memory processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1747–1766. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01674-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, V. L., Cain, K., & Marić, N. (2007). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: Does mental imagery training help? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(6), 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601084402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2011). Mental imagery and visual working memory. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e29221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2014). The sensory strength of voluntary visual imagery predicts visual working memory capacity. Journal of Vision, 14(12), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.12.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2018). The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia. Cortex, 105, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., Glisky, M., Peterson, M. A., & Harvey, E. M. (1991). Vividness and control of mental imagery: A psychometric analysis. Journal of Mental Imagery, 15(3–4), 133–142. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-18272-001
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumcu, A., & Thompson, R. L. (2016). Spatial interference and individual differences in looking at nothing for verbal memory. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2387–2392). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kumcu, A., & Thompson, R. L. (2020). Less imageable words lead to more looks to blank locations during memory retrieval. Psychological Research, 84(3), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1084-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, C. F., Lavan, N., Evans, S., Agnew, Z., Halpern, A. R., Shanmugalingam, P., Meekings, S., Boebinger, D., Ostarek, M., McGettigan, C., Warren, J. E., & Scott, S. K. (2015). Feel the noise: Relating individual differences in auditory imagery to the structure and function of sensorimotor systems. Cerebral Cortex, 25(11), 4638–4650. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M. (2011). Methodology in interpreting studies: A methodological review of evidence-based research. In B. Nicodemus, & L. Swabey (Eds.), Advances in interpreting research: Inquiry in action (pp. 85–120). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C., & Neisser, U. (1985). Factors of imagery and event recall. Memory & Cognition, 13(6), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, D. F. (1983). In defense of imagery questionnaires. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00496.x
   Google Scholar
• Marks, D. F. (1999). Consciousness, mental imagery and action. British Journal of Psychology, 90(4), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712699161639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marre, Q., Huet, N., & Labeye, E. (2021). Embodied mental imagery improves memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(8), 1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211009227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschark, M., & Cornoldi, C. (1991). Imagery and verbal memory. In C. Cornoldi, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Imagery and cognition (pp. 133–182). Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, S., & Pfeifer, G. (2012). Personality differences in mental imagery and the effects on verbal memory. British Journal of Psychology, 103(4), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02094.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKelvie, S. J. (1992). Consistency of interform content for the gordon test of visual imagery control. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74(3 Pt 2), 1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.74.3c.1107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvie, S. J. (1994). The vividness of visual imagery questionnaire as a predictor of facial recognition memory performance. British Journal of Psychology, 85(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02510.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKelvie, S. J. (1995). Vividness of visual imagery: Measurement, nature, function & dynamics. Brandon House.
   Google Scholar
• McNorgan, C. (2012). A meta-analytic review of multisensory imagery identifies the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-general imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(SEPTEMBER), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuno, A. (2005). Volet interprétation. Meta, 50(2), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.7202/011015ar
   Google Scholar
• Moen, K. C., Beck, M. R., Saltzmann, S. M., Cowan, T. M., Burleigh, L. M., Butler, L. G., Ramanujam, J., Cohen, A. S., & Greening, S. G. (2020). Strengthening spatial reasoning: Elucidating the attentional and neural mechanisms associated with mental rotation skill development. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00211-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2022). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (R package version 0.9.12-4.4). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor.
   Google Scholar
• Nelis, S., Holmes, E. A., Griffith, J. W., & Raes, F. (2014). Mental imagery during daily life: Psychometric evaluation of the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS). Psychologica Belgica, 54(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.ag
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. C., Bays, R. B., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2016). False memories and the DRM paradigm: Effects of imagery, list, and test type. The Journal of General Psychology, 143(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2015.1110558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, A. (2018). Transfer and maintenance effect of n-back working memory training in interpreting students: A Behavioural and optical brain imaging study. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. (2019). The human imagination: The cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(10), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., Rademaker, R. L., & Tong, F. (2011). Evaluating the mind’s Eye. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1535–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reisberg, D., & Leak, S. (1987). Visual imagery and memory for appearance: Does Clark Gable or George C. Scott have bushier eyebrows? Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 41(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg, D., Pearson, D. G., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator’s theoretical views. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. (1977). The meaning and measurement of memory imagery. British Journal of Psychology, 68(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01556.x
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (1980). Mental imagery and human memory. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, G. L., & Lee, J. F. (1996). A comparison of recall and summary protocols as measures of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing, 13(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300203
   Google Scholar
• Robin, F. (2011). Imagination and false memories. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 30(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.30.4.e
   Google Scholar
• Rodway, P., Gillies, K., & Schepman, A. (2006). Vivid imagers are better at detecting salient changes. Journal of Individual Differences, 27(4), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.27.4.218
   Google Scholar
• Runge, M. S., Cheung, M. W. L., & D’Angiulli, A. (2017). Meta-analytic comparison of trial- versus questionnaire-based vividness reportability across behavioral, cognitive and neural measurements of imagery. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2017(1), nix006. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russell, D., & Takeda, K. (2015). Consecutive interpreting. In H. Mikkelson, & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpreting (pp. 224–245). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). How well do we know our own conscious experience? The case of visual imagery. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 35–53. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-17490-005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setton, R., & Dawrant, A. (2016). Conference interpreting: A trainer’s guide. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W., & Neisser, U. (1969). Some variables affecting the vividness of imagery in recall. British Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01178.x
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S.-Y., Lidster, R., Sabraw, S., & Yeager, R. (2016). The effects of L2 proficiency differences in pairs on idea units in a collaborative text reconstruction task. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814567888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachowiak-Szymczak, K. (2019). Eye movements and gestures in simultaneous and consecutive interpreting. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2005). Olfactory imagery: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabi, Y. A., Maio, M. R., Attaallah, B., Dickson, S., Drew, D., Idris, M. I., Kienast, A., Klar, V., Nobis, L., Plant, O., Saleh, Y., Sandhu, T. R., Slavkova, E., Toniolo, S., Zokaei, N., Manohar, S. G., & Husain, M. (2022). Vividness of visual imagery questionnaire scores and their relationship to visual short-term memory performance. Cortex, 146, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. J. T. (1999). Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive Science, 23(2), 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2302_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchiano, M. (2020). Effsize: Efficient effect size computation (R package version 0.8.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=effsize.
   Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1993). Facts and fiction about memory aging: A quantitative integration of research findings. Journal of Gerontology, 48(4), P157–P171. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/48.4.P157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wen, H., & Dong, Y. (2019). How does interpreting experience enhance working memory and short-term memory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(8), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1674857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5499.
   Google Scholar
• Yenkimaleki, M., & van Heuven, V. J. (2017). The effect of memory training on consecutive interpreting performance by interpreter trainees. FORUM. Revue Internationale D’interprétation et de Traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, 15(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.15.1.09yen
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In R. A. Zwaan, & D. Pecher (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224–245). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar