The role of contextual factors on neurocognitive processing: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effect of response types in cognitive tasks

References

• Acosta, V. W., & Nasman, V. T. (1992). Effect of task decision on P300. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(92)90018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., Weber, T. A., & Groth, K. E. (1993). Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amso, D., & Casey, B. J. (2009). Cognitive control and development. In L. R. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 1095–1099). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045046-9.00412-5
   Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(2), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2009). Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 1216–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802426866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardila, A., & Ostrosky, F. (2012). Guía para el diagnóstico neuropsicológico. Florida: American Board of Professional Neuropsychology. http://www.inips.com.mx/archivos/Ardila__Ostrosk_Guia_para_el_Diagnostico_Neuropsicologico.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, E. T., Cotter, J. D., & Kilding, A. E. (2021). Impact of elevated core temperature on cognition in hot environments within a military context. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 121(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04591-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon-Macé, N., Kirchner, H., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2007). Effects of task requirements on rapid natural scene processing: From common sensory encoding to distinct decisional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1987). Being there: Why implementation matters to cognitive science. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142924
   Google Scholar
• Correa, C. M. C., Noorman, S., Jiang, J., Palminteri, S., Cohen, M. X., Lebreton, M., & van Gaal, S. (2018). How the level of reward awareness changes the computational and electrophysiological signatures of reinforcement learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(48), 10338–10348. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0457-18.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Blasio, F. M., & Barry, R. J. (2020). Prestimulus alpha and beta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 155, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks, J. J., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2010). Statistical algorithms in review manager 5. Statistical Methods Group of The Cochrane Collaboration, 1(11). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jonathan-Deeks/publication/252093205_Statistical_Algorithms_in_Review_Manager_5/links/54d159b70cf28370d0e07f9e/Statistical-Algorithms-in-Review-Manager-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica, 30, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drevon, D., Fursa, S. R., & Malcolm, A. L. (2017). Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behavior Modification, 41(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (2001). Why vote-count reviews don’t count. Biological Psychiatry, 2(49), 161–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01075-1
   Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa, T. A., Barbui, C., Cipriani, A., Brambilla, P., & Watanabe, N. (2006). Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007). A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80004-8
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, B., & Caramazza, A. (1982). Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity. Brain and Language, 15(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90053-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R., & Reed, J. M. (1992). What makes targets redundant? Perception & Psychophysics, 51(5), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A. W. (2007). Publish or Perish. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=cTqyDwAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S., Deeks, J., & Altman, D. (2002). Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: A critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819021927674
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009). A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 172(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1998). The effects of word frequency for Japanese kana and kanji words in naming and lexical decision: Can the dual-route model save the lexical-selection account? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1431–1453. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). Effects of word frequency and spelling–to–sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878; discussion 878–937. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultcrantz, M., Rind, D., Akl, E. A., Treweek, S., Mustafa, R. A., Iorio, A., Alper, B. S., Meerpohl, J. J., Murad, M. H., Ansari, M. T., Katikireddi, S. V., Östlund, P., Tranæus, S., Christensen, R., Gartlehner, G., Brozek, J., Izcovich, A., Schünemann, H., & Guyatt, G. (2017). The GRADE working group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 87, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, H., Li, H., & Yu, D. (2017). The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/nogo task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 117(1), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00363.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jogan, M., & Stocker, A. A. (2014). A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.3.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouce, S., Donaldson, D. I., Dudchenko, P. A., & Ietswaart, M. (2019). Mobile EEG identifies the re-allocation of attention during real-world activity. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51996-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laming, D. (2013). Contrast discrimination by the methods of adjustment and two-alternative forced choice, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(8), 1774–1782. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0544-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Lee, Y., Tae, J., & Kwon, Y. (2019). Advantage of the go/no-go task over the yes/no lexical decision task: ERP indexes of parameters in the diffusion model. PloS One, 14(7), e0218451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-López, J. A., Page, M. J., Lipsey, M. W., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2018). Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathey, S., Robert, C., & Zagar, D. (2004). Neighbourhood distribution interacts with orthographic priming in the lexical decision task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(4), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster University, & Evidence Prime. (2021). GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. Available from gradepro.org.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, M. A., & van Orden, G. C. (2001). Word recognition, cognitive psychology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 16556–16561). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01553-9
   Google Scholar
• Moret-Tatay, C., & Perea, M. (2011). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Pardo, E., Navarro-Prados, A. B., Gamermann, D., & Moret-Tatay, C. (2013). Differences between young and old university students on a lexical decision task: Evidence through an ex-Gaussian approach. The Journal of General Psychology, 140(4), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2013.817964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Noah, T., Schul, Y., & Mayo, R. (2018). When both the original study and its failed replication are correct: Feeling observed eliminates the facial-feedback effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Devis, E., Marcet, A., & Gomez, P. (2016). Are go/no-go tasks preferable to two-choice tasks in response time experiments with older adults? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1107077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Fraga, I. (2010). Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: A test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2003). Los efectos de facilitación semántica con las tareas de decisión léxica sí-no y sólo-sí. Psicothema, 15(1), 114–119. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72715119.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2002). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2003). Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: Evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194799
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2013). Computational grounded cognition: A new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., Parker, D. S., Sabb, F. W., & Bilder, R. M. (2011). The cognitive atlas: Toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2011.00017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: Informatics and the search for mental structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L. M., & Murray, R. F. (2015). Classification images reveal decision variables and strategies in forced choice tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(23), 7321–7326. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422169112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Garner, P., & Donegan, S. (2019). Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 7(2), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohatgi, A. (2021). Webplotdigitizer (Version 4.5) [Computer software]. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A., Grasso-Cladera, A., Luarte, N., Riillo, A., & Parada, F. J. (2019). The brain/body-in-the-world system is cognitive science’s study object for the twenty-first century / El sistema cerebro/cuerpo-en-el-mundo es el objeto de estudio de la ciencia cognitiva en el siglo XXI. Estudios de Psicología, 40(2), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1596704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev, P. S., Blacker, D., Blazer, D. G., Ganguli, M., Jeste, D. V., Paulsen, J. S., & Petersen, R. C. (2014). Classifying neurocognitive disorders: The DSM-5 approach. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10(11), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Kuhn, A., León, J. J., Gôngora, K., Pérez-Fernández, C., Sánchez-Santed, F., Moreno, M., & Flores, P. (2017). Go/No-Go task performance predicts differences in compulsivity but not in impulsivity personality traits. Psychiatry Research, 257, 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schünemann, H., Brożek, J., Guyatt, G., & Oxman, A. (eds.). (2013). GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. The GRADE Working Group. Available from guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Shears, C., & Chiarello, C. (2003). No go on neutrals? An interhemispheric account of semantic category priming. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/713754474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Buchanan, L., & Westbury, C. (2003). The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., & Owen, W. J. (2007). Multiple meanings are not necessarily a disadvantage in semantic processing: Evidence from homophone effects in semantic categorisation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600834756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A. C., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., Carpenter, J. R., Chan, A.-W., Churchill, R., Deeks, J. J., Hróbjartsson, A., Kirkham, J., Jüni, P., Loke, Y. K., Pigott, T. D., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 355, i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., Emberson, J. R., Hernán, M. A., Hopewell, S., Hróbjartsson, A., Junqueira, D. R., Jüni, P., Kirkham, J. J., Lasserson, T., Li, T., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). Rob 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stüttgen, M. C., Schwarz, C., & Jäkel, F. (2011). Mapping spikes to sensations. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Cochrane Collaboration. (2020). Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 5.4) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Tian, X., Fang, Z., & Liu, W. (2021). Decreased humidity improves cognitive performance at extreme high indoor temperature. Indoor Air, 31(3), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti, L., & Natale, V. (2019). Effects of a single short exposure to blue light on cognitive performance. Chronobiology International, 36(5), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2019.1593191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, W. R. (2001). The New phrenology. The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, A. H., & La Heij, W. (1982). The array size function in simple visual search tasks: A comparison between “go-no go” and “yes-no” tasks under conditions of high and low target-noise similarity. Psychological Research, 44(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, A. H., & La Heij, W. (1983). The array-size function in simple visual search tasks: A comparison between a “go- no go” and a “detection” task under conditions of low target-noise similarity. Psychological Research, 45(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, A. H., La Heij, W., & Boer, J. P. (1983). Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple visual search tasks. Psychological Research, 45(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J., Swart, J. C., Egner, T., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Cohen, M. X. (2015). (No) time for control: Frontal theta dynamics reveal the cost of temporally guided conflict anticipation, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(4), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0367-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Gomez, P., & Perea, M. (2020). Should I stay or should I go? An ERP analysis of two-choice versus go/no-go response procedures in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2022). Mapping effects in choice-response and go/no-go variants of the lexical decision task: A case for polarity correspondence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(3), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211043860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. Q., Lauzon, B., Seergobin, K. N., & MacDonald, P. A. (2018). Dopaminergic therapy increases Go timeouts in the Go/No-Go task in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 642. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar