Retrieval practice effect and individual differences: current status and future directions

References

• Abel, M., & Roediger, H. L., III (2017). Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0641-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P. K., & Bain, P. M. (2019). Powerful teaching: Unleash the science of learning. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119549031
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P. K., Finley, J. R., Rose, N. S., & Roediger, H. L., III (2017). Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity. Memory (Hove, England), 25(6), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertilsson, F., Stenlund, T., Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., & Jonsson, B. (2021). Retrieval practice: Beneficial for all students or moderated by individual differences? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725720973494
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Kievit, R. A., Cervone, D., & Hood, S. B. (2009). The two disciplines of scientific psychology, or: The disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 67–97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G., Robey, A., & Unsworth, N. (2021). Discrepant findings on the relation between episodic memory and retrieval practice: The impact of analysis decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, Article 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., & Unsworth, N. (2012). Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(3), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2022). Retrieval-based learning and prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students' retention of U.S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavendish, B. A., Lima, M. F. R., Perícoli, L., & Buratto, L. G. (2022). Effects of combining retrieval practice and tDCS over long-term memory: A randomized controlled trial. Brain and Cognition, 156, Article 105807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coane, J. H. (2013). Retrieval practice and elaborative encoding benefit memory in younger and older adults. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogliano, M., Kardash, C. M., & Bernacki, M. L. (2019). The effects of retrieval practice and prior topic knowledge on test performance and confidence judgments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12(11), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutcher, R. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2000). The role of mediators in memory retrieval as a function of practice: Controlled mediation to direct access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1297–1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, R., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, J., & Richter, T. (2023). The testing effect in the lecture Hall: Does it depend on learner prerequisites? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 22(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221136660
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. W., Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2024). Interaction between the testing and forward testing effects in the case of cued-recall: Implications for theory, individual difference studies, and application. Journal of Memory and Language, 134, Article 104476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2023.104476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. K., & Kahana, M. J. (2014). Is memory search governed by universal principles or idiosyncratic strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, A., Eisenkraemer, R. E., & Stein, L. M. (2015). Test-enhanced learning in third-grade children. Educational Psychology, 35(4), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.963030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, B., Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Nyroos, M., & Börjesson, A. (2014). Self-reported memory strategies and their relationship to immediate and delayed text recall and working memory capacity. Education Inquiry, 5(3), 22850–22404. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v5.22850
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, B., Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Stenlund, T., Andersson, M., & Nyberg, L. (2021). A learning method for all: The testing effect is independent of cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 972–985. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp. 487–514). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 61, pp. 237–284). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Jr., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
   Google Scholar
• Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (2013). Is retrieval mediated after repeated testing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, M., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: Dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, M. F. R., & Buratto, L. G. (2023). The test–retest reliability of the retrieval practice effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(9), 2028–2036. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221141586
   Google Scholar
• Lima, M. F. R., Cavendish, B. A., Deus, J. S., & Buratto, L. G. (2020). Retrieval practice in memory- and language-impaired populations: A systematic review. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(7), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. L., Tan, D. H., & Reder, L. M. (2018). The two processes underlying the testing effect– Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). Neuropsychologia, 112, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, R. (2018). Human cognition: Common principles and individual variation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Laiacona, M., Chalmers, P., & Wynn, V. (1996). Group aggregates and individual reliability: The case of verbal short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 24(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. B. (2021). Practicing retrieval facilitates learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(23), 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minear, M., Coane, J. H., Boland, S. C., Cooney, L. H., & Albat, M. (2018). The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9), 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, B. F. T., Pinto, T. S. S., Justi, F. R. R., & Jaeger, A. (2019). Retrieval practice improves learning in children with diverse visual word recognition skills. Memory (Hove, England), 27(10), 1423–1437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1668017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W., Buchin, Z. L., & Zhang, A. L. (2022). The testing effect with free recall: Organization, attention, and order effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 125, Article 104333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. C., Pashler, H., Potter, Z. E., & Rickard, T. C. (2015). Testing enhances learning across a range of episodic memory abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2011). Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov, V., & Reder, L. M. (2020). Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory. Psychological Review, 127(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330(6002), 335–335. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Zamary, A. (2019). Why is free recall practice more effective than recognition practice for enhancing memory? Evaluating the relational processing hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickard, T. C. (2020). Extension of the dual-memory model of test-enhanced learning to distributions and individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(4), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01734-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickard, T. C., & Pan, S. C. (2018). A dual memory theory of the testing effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 847–869. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1298-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, A. (2019). The benefits of testing: Individual differences based on student factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 108, Article 104029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & Yamashiro, J. K. (2020). Evaluating experimental research. In R. J. Sternberg & D. F. Halpern (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology (pp. 249–279). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.012
   Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D. (2010). Test anxiety inventory. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The corsini encyclopedia of psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216
   Google Scholar
• Stenlund, T., Jönsson, F. U., & Jonsson, B. (2017). Group discussions and test-enhanced learning: Individual learning outcomes and personality characteristics. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1143087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumowski, J. F., Chiaravalloti, N., & DeLuca, J. (2010). Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: Clinical application of the testing effect. Neuropsychology, 24(2), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, M. C. S., McDaniel, M. A., Hodge, G. K., Jones, A. P., Matzen, L. E., Kittinger, L. I., Kittinger, R. S., & Clark, V. P. (2021). Is the testing effect ready to be put to work? Evidence from the laboratory to the classroom. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 7(3), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000292
   Google Scholar
• Tse, C.-S., Balota, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (2010). The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face–name pairs in healthy older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 833–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, C.-S., Chan, M. H.-M., Tse, W.-S., & Wong, S. W.-H. (2019). Can the testing effect for general knowledge facts be influenced by distraction due to divided attention or experimentally induced anxious mood? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, C.-S., & Pu, X. (2012). The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N. (2019). Individual differences in long-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 79–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Miller, A. L., & Robison, M. K. (2021). Are individual differences in attention control related to working memory capacity? A latent variable mega-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(7), 1332–1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walrath, R., Willis, J. O., Dumont, R., & Kaufman, A. S. (2020). Factor-analytic models of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 75–98). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M.-A. (2019). Relatively unintelligent individuals do not benefit from intentionally hindered learning: The role of desirable difficulties. Intelligence, 77, Article 101405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Stillesjö, S., Andersson, M., Jonsson, B., & Nyberg, L. (2022). Retrieval practice is effective regardless of self-reported need for cognition - Behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 797395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Sun, B., Potts, R., Yu, R., Luo, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2020). Do working memory capacity and test anxiety modulate the beneficial effects of testing on new learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(4), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Sun, P., & Liu, X. (2023). Retrieval practice is costly and is beneficial only when working memory capacity is abundant. NPJ Science of Learning, 8(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00159-w
   Google Scholar