The unsteady hydrodynamic characteristics of a partial submerged propeller via a RANS solver

References

• Califano A, Steen S. 2009. Analysis of different propeller ventilation mechanisms by means of RANS simulations. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP'09, Trondheim, Norway, June.
   Google Scholar
• Caponnetto M. 2002. RANSE simulations of surface piercing propellers. Rolla Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassemi H. 2009. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the surface-piercing propellers for the planing craft. J Mar Sci Appl. December 2009. 8(4):267–274. doi: 10.1007/s11804-009-8076-2
   Google Scholar
• Kamen P. 1995. Surface-piercing propellers. Boat builder Magazine. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Koushan K. 2004. Environmental and interaction effects on propulsion systems used in dynamic positioning, an overview. Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and other Floating Structures PRADS 2004, Lübeck-Travemünde, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowska AM, Wöckner K, Steen S, Rung T, Koushan K, Spence S. 2009. Numerical and experimental study of propeller ventilation. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors. SMP'09, Trondheim, Norway, June.
   Google Scholar
• Kruppa CFL. 1992. Testing surface piercing propellers. In Hydrodynamics: Computations, Model Tests, and Reality. 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Launder BE, Spalding DB. 1972. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misra SC, Gokarn RP, Sha OP, Suryanarayana C, Suresh RV. 2012. Development of a four-bladed surface piercing propeller series. Nav Eng J. 124–4:105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson N. 1996. Force and flow characteristics of a partially submerged propeller. PhD thesis. Goteborg, Sweden: Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee SH, Kawamura T, Li H. 2005. Propeller cavitation study using an unstructured grid based navier-stoker solver. J. Fluids Eng. 127(5):986–994. doi: 10.1115/1.1989370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose JC, Kruppa CFL. 1991. Surface piercing propellers – methodical series model test results. In FAST'91, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Rose JC, Kruppa CFL, Koushan K. 1993. Surface piercing propellers – propeller/hull interaction. In FAST'93. 867–881, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Savineau C, Kinnas SA. 1995. A Numerical formulation applicable to surface piercing hydrofoils and propellers. In 24th American Towing Tank Conference, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Savineau CM. 1996. A time marching boundary element method for the prediction of the flow around surface piercing hydrofoils. Master's thesis. Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, February.
   Google Scholar
• Shiba H. 1953. Air-drawing of marine propellers. Technical Report 9, Transportation Technical Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• The Propulsion Committee. 2002. Proceedings of the 23rd ITTC. 23th International Towing Tank Conference. I:90–142.
   Google Scholar
• Vinayan V, Kinnas SA. 2008. Numerical modeling of surface piercing hydrofoils and propellers. In Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Vinayan V, Kinnas SA. 2009. A boundary element method for the strongly nonlinear analysis of surface-piercing hydrofoils. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation. CAV2009 – Paper No. 97. August 17–22, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijdag A, Stapersma D, Terwisga T. 2010. Control of propeller cavitation in operational conditions. J Mar Eng Tech. 9(1):15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D. 1977. Water entry and exit of a fully ventilated foil. J Ship Res. 21:44–68.
   Google Scholar
• Young YL, Kinnas SA. 2003. Analysis of supercavitating and surface-piercing propeller flows via BEM. Comput Mech. 32:269–280 _ Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/s00466-003-0484-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young YL, Kinnas SA. 2004. Performance prediction of surface-piercing propellers. J Ship Res. 28:288–304.
   Google Scholar