References
- Aghaee M, Fazli S. 2012. An improved MCDM method for maintenance approach selection: a case study of auto industry. Manage Sci Lett. 2:137–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2011.09.012
- Ahmadi A, Gupta S, Karim R, Kumar U. 2010. Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int Reliab Qual Saf Eng. 17(3):223–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539310003779
- Ahmadi A, Khouy IA, Kumar U, Schunnesson H. 2009. Selection of maintenance strategy using analytical hierarchy process. Commun Depend Qual Manage. 12(1):121–132.
- Al-najjar, B., Alsyouf, I. 2003. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. Int J Prod Econ. 84, 85–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8
- Bashiri M, Badri H, Hejazi TH. 2011. Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by fuzzy interactive linear assignment method. Appl Math Model. 35(1):152–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.05.014
- Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M. 2006. A combined goal programming – AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 91(7):839–848. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.08.006
- Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. 2000. The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 70(1):71–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-8
- Brans J-P, Vincke P. 1985. Note – a preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manage Sci. 31:647–656. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
- Chan FTS, Prakash A. 2012. Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach. Int J Prod Res. 50(23):7044–7056. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.653451
- Cheng YH, Tsao HL. 2010. Rolling stock maintenance strategy selection, spares parts’ estimation, and replacements’ interval calculation. Int J Prod Econ. 128(1):404–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.038
- Dinmohammadi A, Shafiee M. 2017. Determination of the most suitable technology transfer strategy for wind turbines using an integrated AHP-TOPSIS decision model. Energies. 10(5):17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10050642
- Emovon I, Norman RA, Murphy AJ. 2018. Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems. J Intell Manuf. 29(3):519–531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1133-6
- Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Lashgari A, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. 2012. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. Int J Strategic Prop Manage. 16(1):85–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.666657
- Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. 2009. Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. J Manuf Technol Manage. 20(7):1009–1022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380910984258
- Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. 2012. Application of hybrid VIKOR model in selection of maintenance strategy. Int J Inform Syst Supply Chain Manage. 5(2):59–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/jisscm.2012040104
- Jajimoggala S, Rao VVSK, Satyanarayana B. 2011. Maintenance strategy evaluation using ANP and goal programming. Int J Strategic Dec Sci. 2(2):56–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsds.2011040104
- Jayaswal P, Sagar MK, Kushwah K. 2013. Maintenance strategy selection by fuzzy TOPSIS method of material handling equipment. Int J Emerging Trends Eng Devel. 2(3):126–135.
- Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. 2014. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Struct Infrastructure Eng. 10(9):1176–1210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978
- Kumar G, Maiti J. 2012. Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl. 39(11):9946–9954. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.004
- Kumar M, Jayaswal P, Kushwah K. 2013. Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. Int J Curr Eng Technol. 3(2):600–605.
- Momeni M, Fathi M, Zarchi M, Azizollahi S. 2011. A fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach to maintenance strategy selection: a case study. Middle-East J Sci Res. 8(3):699–706.
- Nezami FG, Yildirim MB. 2013. A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strategy. Int J Sustain Eng. 6(4):332–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2013.765928
- Nikitas N, Ioannis D. 2013. Application of analytic hierarchy process & TOPSIS methodology on ships’ maintenance strategies. J Polish Safety Reliab Assoc. 4(1):21–28.
- Nikouei MA, Oroujzadeh M, Mehdipour-Ataei S. 2017. The PROMETHEE multiple criteria decision making analysis for selecting the best membrane prepared from sulfonated poly(ether ketone)s and poly(ether sulfone)s for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy. 119:77–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.052
- Odeyale SO, Alamu OJ, Odeyale EO. 2013. The analytical hierarchy process concept for maintenance strategy selection in manufacturing industries. Pac J Sci Technol. 14(1):223–233.
- Pariazar M, Shahrabi J, Zaeri MS, Parhizi S. 2008. A combined approach for maintenance strategy selection. J Appl Sci. 23(8):4321–4329. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.4321.4329
- Pourjavad E, Shirouyehzad H, Shahin A. 2013. Selecting maintenance strategy in mining industry by analytic network process and TOPSIS. Int J Indus Syst Eng. 15(2):171–192.
- Ratnayake RMC, Markeset T. 2010. Technical integrity management: measuring HSE awareness using AHP in selecting a maintenance strategy. J Qual Maintenance Eng. 16(1):44–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511011030327
- Saaty TL. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Sadeghi A, Manesh RA. 2012. The application of fuzzy group analytic network process to selection of best maintenance strategy – a case study in Mobarakeh steel company, Iran. Procedia – Social Behav Sci. 62:1378–1383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.236
- Samarakoon SMK, Ratnayake RMC. 2015. Strengthening, modification and repair techniques’ prioritization for structural integrity control of ageing offshore structures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 135:15–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.023
- Shafiee M. 2015. Maintenance strategy selection problem: an MCDM overview. J Qual Maintenance Eng. 21(4):378–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-09-2013-0063
- Shafiee M, Labib A, Maiti J, Starr A. 2019. Maintenance strategy selection for multi-component systems using a combined analytic network process and cost-risk criticality model. doi:10.1177/1748006X17712071.
- Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. 2008. Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J Qual Maintenance Eng. 14(4):357–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510810909975
- Silva VBS, Morais DC, Almeida AT. 2010. A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in Brazil. Water Resour Manage. 24(14):4075–4091. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9648-2
- Tan Z, Li J, Wu Z, Zheng J, He W. 2011. An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Saf Sci. 49(6):852–860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.015
- Turcksin L, Bernardini A, Macharis C. 2011. A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Proc – Social Behav Sci. 20:954–965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104
- Vinodh S, Jeya Girubha R. 2011. Promethee based sustainable concept selection. Appl Math Model. 36(11):5301–5308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.030
- VPSolutions. 2013. Visual PROMETHEE 1.4 Manual. http://www.promethee-gaia.net/assets/vpmanual.pdf (n.d.). Visual PROMETHEE, 192 p.
- Wang L, Chu J, Wu J. 2007. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ. 107(1):151–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005
- Zaim S, Turkyılmaz A, Acar MF, Al-Turki U, Demirel OF. 2012. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. J Qual Maintenance Eng. 18(1):16–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511211226166