A fuzzy-based occupational health and safety risk assessment framework and a case study in an international port authority

References

• Acuner O, Cebi S. 2016. An effective risk-preventive model proposal for occupational accidents at shipyards. Brodogradnja. 67(1):67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ak MF, Gul M. 2018. AHP-TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis. Complex Intell Syst. 5(2):113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyami H, Lee PTW, Yang Z, Riahi R, Bonsall S, Wang J. 2014. An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation. Marit Policy Manag. 41(7):634–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyami H, Yang Z, Riahi R, Bonsall S, Wang J. 2016. Advanced uncertainty modelling for container port risk analysis. Accid Anal Prev. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antão P, Calderón M, Puig M, Michail A, Wooldridge C, Darbra RM. 2016. Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance indicators in port areas. Saf Sci. 85:266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi A, Kannan G. 2016. Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Comput Ind Eng. 91:100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley JJ. 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17(3):233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Lam JSL. 2019. A fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment: Case of Tianjin port explosion. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 128:11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik M, Cebi S, Kahraman C, Er ID. 2009. Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network. Expert Syst Appl. 36(3):4541–4557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan HK, Wang X. 2013. Fuzzy extent analysis for food risk assessment. In: Fuzzy hierarchical model for risk assessment. London: Springer; p. 89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Chang DY. 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 95(3):649–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CT. 2000. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efe B. 2019. Analysis of operational safety risks in shipbuilding using failure mode and effect analysis approach. Ocean Eng. 187:106214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M. 2018a. A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 24(7):1723–1760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M. 2018b. Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: The case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Ak MF. 2018. A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. J Cleaner Prod. 196:653–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Ak MF, Guneri AF. 2017. Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 23(2):187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Ak MF, Guneri AF. 2019. Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR-based approach for safety risk assessment in mine industry. J Saf Res. 69:135–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Celik E, Aydin N, Gumus AT, Guneri AF. 2016. A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl Soft Comput. 46:60–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Guneri AF. 2016. A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 40:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Guneri AF, Baskan M. 2018. An occupational risk assessment approach for construction and operation period of wind turbines. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 4(3):281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Gul M, Guneri AF, Nasirli SM. 2018. A fuzzy-based model for risk assessment of routes in oil transportation. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Guven B, Guneri AF. 2018. A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 53:3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guneri AF, Gul M, Ozgurler S. 2015. A fuzzy AHP methodology for selection of risk assessment methods in occupational safety. Int J Risk Assess Manag. 18(3–4):319–335.
   Google Scholar
• John A, Yang Z, Riahi R, Wang J. 2018. A decision support system for the assessment of seaports’ security under fuzzy environment. In: Modeling, computing and data handling methodologies for maritime transportation. Cham: Springer; p. 145–177.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen S. 2013. Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Vol. 16. London: Routledge; p. 4671–4686.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler S, Robert J, Derigent W, Voisin A, Le Traon Y. 2016. A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst Appl. 65:398–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdevari S, Shahriar K, Esfahanipour A. 2014. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ. 488:85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis D, Gemeni V. 2011. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 24(5):477–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritime Chambers of Commerce of Istanbul and Marmara, Aegean, Mediterranean, Black Sea Region. 2015. Marine Industry Report-2014. www.denizticaretodasi.org.tr/Shared%20Documents/sektorraporu/2014_sektor_tr.pdf [accessed 2016 Jul 1].
   Google Scholar
• Mete S. 2018. Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari K, Ren J, Roberts C, Wang J. 2011. Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. J Hazard Mater. 192(2):465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari K, Ren J, Roberts C, Wang J. 2012. Decision support framework for risk management on sea ports and terminals using fuzzy set theory and evidential reasoning approach. Expert Syst Appl. 39(5):5087–5103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic S. 1998. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering. Belgrade. 2(1):5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Oz NE, Mete S, Serin F, Gul M. 2018. Risk assessment for clearing & grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: An extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1495057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir Y, Gul M, Celik E. 2017. Assessment of occupational hazards and associated risks in fuzzy environment: A case study of a university chemical laboratory. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 23(4):895–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturkoglu Y, Kazançoğlu Y, Ozkan-Ozen YD. 2019. A sustainable and preventative risk management model for ship recycling industry. J Cleaner Prod. 238:117907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radionovs A, Uzhga-Rebrov O. 2017. Comparison of Different Fuzzy AHP Methodologies in Risk Assessment. In Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Volume II (Vol. 137), p. 142.
   Google Scholar
• Reniers GLL, Dullaert W, Ale BJM, Soudan K. 2005. Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 18(3):127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin B. 2017. Consistency control and expert consistency prioritization for FFTA by using extent analysis method of trapezoidal FAHP. Appl Soft Comput. 56:46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin B, Kum S. 2015. Risk assessment of Arctic navigation by using improved fuzzy-AHP approach. Int J Marit Eng. 157(4):241.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin B, Yazır D. 2019. An analysis for the effects of different approaches used to determine expertise coefficients on improved fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ. 34(1):89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin B, Yip TL. 2017. Shipping technology selection for dynamic capability based on improved Gaussian fuzzy AHP model. Ocean Eng. 136:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D. 2002. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 15(4):291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng GH, Huang JJ. 2011. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Florida: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J. 2006. Maritime risk assessment and its current status. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 22(1):3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Ng AK, Wang J. 2014. A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 59:72–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M. 2017. Hybrid probabilistic risk assessment using fuzzy FTA and fuzzy AHP in a process industry. J Fail Anal Prev. 17(4):756–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M. 2018. Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Saf Sci. 110:438–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M. 2019. Footprint of knowledge acquisition improvement in failure diagnosis analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 35(1):405–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M, Korhan O, Daneshvar S. 2018. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in the process industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 1–17. doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucesan M, Kahraman G. 2019. Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP. Energy Policy. 126:343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Teixeira ÂP, Guedes Soares C, Yan X, Liu K. 2016. Maritime transportation risk assessment of Tianjin port with Bayesian belief networks. Risk Anal. 36(6):1171–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar