A numerical study on flow field and maneuvering derivatives of KVLCC2 model at drift condition

References

• Abbas N, Kornev N. 2016. Validation of hybrid URANS/LES methods for determination of forces and wake parameters of KVLCC2 tanker at manoeuvring conditions. Ship Technol Res. 63(2):96–109. doi: 10.1080/09377255.2016.1157275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degani D, Seginer A, Levy Y. 1990. Graphical visualization of vortical flows by means of helicity. AIAA J. 28(8):1347–1352. doi: 10.2514/3.25224
   Google Scholar
• Feng SB, Zou ZJ, Zou L. 2015. Numerical calculation of hydrodynamic forces on a KVLCC2 hull-rudder system in oblique motion. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 49(4):470–474.
   Google Scholar
• Fureby C, Toxopeus SL, Johansson M, Tormalm M, Petterson K. 2016. A computational study of the flow around the KVLCC2 model hull at straight ahead conditions and at drift. Ocean Eng. 118:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Kellett P, Yuan ZM, Incecik A, Turan O, Boulougouris E. 2016. Manoeuvring prediction based on CFD generated derivatives. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 28(2):284–292. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60630-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P. 1988. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for Turbulence Research Report. CTR–S88.
   Google Scholar
• Jin YT, Duffy J, Chai SH, Chin C, Bose N. 2016. URANS study of scale effects on hydrodynamic manoeuvring coefficients of KVLCC2. Ocean Eng. 118:93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamkar SJ, Jameson A, Wissink AM, Sankaran V. 2010. Feature-driven cartesian adaptive mesh refinement in the helios code. Paper presented at: 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. p. 2010–2171.
   Google Scholar
• Kume K, Hasegawa J, Tsukada Y, Fujisawa J, Fukasawa R, Hinatsu M. 2006. Measurements of hydrodynamic forces, surface pressure, and wake for obliquely towed tanker model and uncertainty analysis for CFD validation. J Mar Sci Technol. 11(2):65–75. doi: 10.1007/s00773-005-0209-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Q-J, Wan D-C. 2016. Numerical simulations of viscous flow around the obliquely towed KVLCC2M model in deep and shallow water. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 28(3):506–518. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR. 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32(8):1598–1605. doi: 10.2514/3.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D-M, Lee J, Kim Y. 2015. Uncertainty analysis for added resistance experiment of KVLCC2 ship. Ocean Eng. 95:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira FS, Eça L, Vaz G. 2017. Verification and validation exercises for the flow around the KVLCC2 tanker at model and full-scale Reynolds numbers. Ocean Eng. 129:133–148. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadat-Hosseini H, Wu P-C, Carrica PM, Kim H, Toda Y, Stern F. 2013. CFD verification and validation of added resistance and motions of KVLCC2 with fixed and free surge in short and long head waves. Ocean Eng. 59:240–273. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern F, Wang ZY, Yang JM, Sadat-Hosseini H, Mousaviraad M, Bhushan S, Diez M, Sung-Hwan Y, Wu P-C, Yeon SM, et al. 2015. Recent progress in cfd for naval architecture and ocean engineering. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 27(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(15)60452-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian XM, Zou ZJ, Wang HM. 2010. Computation of the viscous flow and hydrodynamic forces on a KVLCC2 model in oblique motion. J Ship Mech. 14(8):834–840.
   Google Scholar
• Toxopeus SL, Simonsen CD, Guilmineau E, Visonneau M, Xing T, Stern F. 2013. Investigation of water depth and basin wall effects on KVLCC2 in manoeuvring motion using viscous-flow calculations. J Mar Sci Technol. 18(4):471–496. doi: 10.1007/s00773-013-0221-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnock SR, Phillips AB, Furlong M. 2008. URANS simulations of static drift and dynamic manoeuvres of the KVLCC2 tanker. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the workshop on verification and validation of ship manoeuvring simulation methods (SIMMAN 2008). p. 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoydonck W, Toxopeuse S, Eloot K, Bhawsinka K, Queutey P, Visonneau M. 2019. Bank effects for KVLCC2. J Mar Sci Technol. 24(1):174–199. doi: 10.1007/s00773-018-0545-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XQ, Liu HX, Ma S, Guo C. 2017. Investigation of the hydrodynamic model test of forced rolling for a barge using PIV. Chin J Ship Res. 12(2):49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H-M, Zou Z-J, Tian X-M. 2009. Computation of the viscous hydrodynamic forces on a KVLCC2 model moving obliquely in shallow water. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 14(2):241–244. doi: 10.1007/s12204-009-0241-x
   Google Scholar
• Wu XH, Liu ZY, Shi SD, et al. 2005. Ship maneuverability. Beijing: National Defence Industry press.
   Google Scholar
• Xing T, Bhushan S, Stern F. 2012. Vortical and turbulent structures for KVLCC2 at drift angle 0, 12, and 30 degrees. Ocean Eng. 55:23–43. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakhot V, Orzag SA. 1986. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. J Sci Comput. 1(1):3–51. doi: 10.1007/BF01061452
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Yin Y, Lian JJ. 2019. Numerical study on the hydrodynamic performance of the semi-spade rudder and propeller. Adv. Mech. Eng. 11(1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasukawa H, Yoshimura Y. 2015. Introduction of MMG standard method for ship maneuvering predictions. J Mar Sci Technol. 20(1):37–52. doi: 10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar