https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-8669
References
- Brookes Bells. 2020. Systema–systems analysis modeller – safe return to port. See http://www.brookesbell.com/service/software/safe-return-to-port-software.
- Cangelosi D, Bonvicini A, Nardo M, Mola A, Marchese A, Tezzele M, Rozza G. 2018. SRtP 2.0-The evolution of the safe return to port concept. In: Technology and Science for the Ships of the Future. p. 665–672.
- Deltamarin. 2020. Ship design – safe return to port. See https://www.deltamarin.com/current-challenges/safe-return-to-port/.
- DNV GL. 2019. Class guideline – additional class notations – safe return to port.
- Espinoza Haro MP, Seo J, Sadat-Hosseini H, Seok WC, Rhee S, Stern F. 2017. Numerical simulations for the safe return to port of a damaged passenger ship in head or following seas. Ocean Eng. 147:305–318.
- Global Maritime. 2020. Safe return to port assurance package. See https://www.globalmaritime.com/safe-return-to-port.
- Hovden K. 2017. Introduction to safe return to port. Training Course Lecture. 1–54.
- IMO. 2006a. Resolution MSC 216 82. International Maritime Organization.
- IMO. 2006b. SOLAS – international convention for the safety of life at sea – Chapter II-1 – Construction – Structure, subdivision and stability, machinery and electrical installations – Part B-1 – stability – Regulation 8-1 – system capabilities and operational information after a flooding casualty on passenger ships. International Maritime Organization.
- IMO. 2006c. SOLAS, international convention for the safety of life at sea – Chapter II-2 – construction – fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction – part g – special requirements – Regulation 21 – casualty threshold, safe return to port and safe areas. International Maritime Organization.
- IMO. 2006d. SOLAS, international convention for the safety of life at sea – Chapter II-2 – construction – fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction – part G – special requirements – Regulation 22 – Design criteria for systems to remain operational after a fire casualty. International Maritime Organization.
- Jaurola M, Hedin A, Tikkanen S, Huhtala K. 2019. Optimising design and power management in energy-efficient marine vessel power systems: a literature review. J Mar Eng Technol. 18:92–101.
- NAPA. 2020. NAPA – Software hydrostatics and stability. See https://www.napa.fi/software-and-services/ship-design/hydrostatics-and-stability.
- Romano P, Formentini M, Bandera C, Tomasella M. 2010. Value analysis as a decision support tool in cruise ship design. Int J Product Res. 48(23):6939–6958.
- Ruth E, Rognebakke O. 2019. CFD in damage stability. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Ship Stability Workshop.
- SARC. 2020. PIAS – program for the integral approach of shipdesign. Manual of PIAS.
- Spanos D, Papanikolaou A. 2011. On the time dependence of survivability of ROPAX ships. J Mar Sci Technol. 17:40–46.
- van Diessen MF, Duchateau EAE, Kana AA, Hopman JJ. 2021 Oct 28. Integrating vulnerability analysis into the early stage distributed naval ship system design process. J Mar Eng Technol. 1–1.
- Vassalos D. 2009. Designing for damage stability and survivability – contemporary developments and implementation. Ship Sci Technol. 1:59–72.
- Vicenzutti A, Bucci V, Sulligoi O, Pelaschier R. 2016. Impact of safe return to port rules on passenger ships power systems design. In: AEIT 2016 – International Annual Conference: Sustainable Development in the Mediterranean Area, Energy and ICT Networks of the Future. Vol. 216. p. 1–7.
- Walree FV. 2010. Cooperative research navies develops new FREDYN software. MARIN Magazine.