Cost-benefit analysis of emission reduction techniques: a case for container vessel

References

• Abadie LM, Goicoechea N. 2019. Powering newly constructed vessels to comply with ECA regulations under fuel market prices uncertainty: diesel or dual fuel engine? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 67:433–448. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie LM, Goicoechea N, Galarraga I. 2017. Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations: fuel switching or installing a scrubber? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 57:237–250. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdon A, Zhang X, Parra D, Patel MK, Bauer C, Worlitschek J. 2017. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of stationary electricity storage technologies for different time scales. Energy. 139:1173–1187. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABS. 2020. Ammonia as marine fuel. NH3 Fuel Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Ammar NR. 2019. An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 69:66–76. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar NR, Seddiek IS. 2017. Eco-environmental analysis of ship emission control methods: case study RO-RO cargo vessel. Ocean Eng. 137:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynolf S, Magnusson M, Fridell E, Andersson K. 2014. Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 28:6–18. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiazzo G, Langella G, Miccio F, Scala F. 2012. An experimental investigation on seawater SO2 scrubbing for marine application. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 32:1179–1186. doi:10.1002/ep.11723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CE Delft. 2023. Handboek Milieuprijzen 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson Research Services Limited. 2020. World Fleet Register.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett JJ, Thomson James Winebrake HJ, Manager P, Yuska D. 2014. Natural gas for waterborne freight transport: a life cycle emissions assessment with case studies.
   Google Scholar
• Deng J, Wang X, Wei Z, Wang L, Wang C, Chen Z. 2021. A review of NOx and SOx emission reduction technologies for marine diesel engines and the potential evaluation of liquefied natural gas fuelled vessels. Sci Total Environ 766:144319. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doug W. 2010. Dual-fuel and gas engines, pounder’s marine diesel engines and gas turbines. 9th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ejder E, Arslanoğlu Y. 2022. Evaluation of ammonia fueled engine for a bulk carrier in marine decarbonization pathways. J Clean Prod. 379:134688. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Llamas X. 2020. Robustness analysis of dual actuator EGR controllers in marine two-stroke diesel engines. J Mar Eng Technol. 19:17–30. doi:10.1080/20464177.2020.1712065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estevez R, López-Tenllado FJ, Aguado-Deblas L, Bautista FM, Romero AA, Luna D. 2023. Current research on green ammonia (NH3) as a potential vector energy for power storage and engine fuels: a review. Energies 16:5451. doi:10.3390/en16145451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems Association. 2012. A practical guide to exhaust gas cleaning systems for the maritime industry. EGCSA Handbook, London UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fan H, Tu H, Enshaei H, Xu X, Wei Y. 2021. Comparison of the economic performances of three sulphur oxides emissions abatement solutions for a Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC). J Mar Sci Eng. 9:221. doi:10.3390/jmse9020221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Gu B, Luo M. 2020. A cost-benefit analysis of fuel-switching vs. hybrid scrubber installation: a container route through the Chinese SECA case. Transp Policy. 99:336–344. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Shipping Programme. 2021. Ammonia as a marine fuel safety handbook 2, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Harahap F, Nurdiawati A, Conti D, Leduc S, Urban F. 2023. Renewable marine fuel production for decarbonised maritime shipping: pathways, policy measures and transition dynamics. J Clean Prod. 415:137906. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannaccone T, Landucci G, Tugnoli A, Salzano E, Cozzani V. 2020. Sustainability of cruise ship fuel systems: comparison among LNG and diesel technologies. J Clean Prod. 260:121069. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMO. 1997. International Maritime Organization, Annex VI of Marpol 73/78: Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships and Nox technical Code. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2018a. International Maritime Organization, Implementation of Suphur 2020 limit – carriage ban adopted. Mepc, vol. 7. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2018b. International Maritime Organization, Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2019. International Maritime Organization, The 2020 global sulphur limit: FAQ. Int Marit Organ 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2020. International Maritime Organization, Fourth IMO GHG study, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Inal OB, Zincir B, Deniz C. 2022. Investigation on the decarbonization of shipping: an approach to hydrogen and ammonia. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 47:19888–19900. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram V, Nigam A, Welch WA, Miller JW, Cocker DR. 2011. Effectiveness of emission control technologies for auxiliary engines on ocean-going vessels. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 61:14–21. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.61.1.14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang L, Kronbak J, Christensen LP. 2014. The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 28:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim AR, Seo YJ. 2019. The reduction of SOx emissions in the shipping industry: the case of Korean companies. Mar Policy. 100:98–106. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korean Register. 2018. Guide to strengthened global SOx regulation. https://www.krs.co.kr/eng/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C. 2017. Performance evaluation of a urea-selective catalytic reduction system in a marine diesel engine. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ. 231:801–808. doi:10.1177/1475090216667238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Yoo SH, Huh SY. 2020. Economic benefits of introducing LNG-fuelled ships for imported flour in South Korea. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 78:102220. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.102220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Wu M, Gu X, Yuen KF, Xiao Y. 2020. Determinants of ship operators’ options for compliance with IMO 2020. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 86:102459. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstad H, Sandaas I, Strømman AH. 2015. Assessment of cost as a function of abatement options in maritime emission control areas. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 38:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstad HE, Rehn CF, Eskeland GS. 2017. Sulphur abatement globally in maritime shipping. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 57:303–313. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wu Y, Wang Y. 2022. Numerical investigation on the combustion and emission characteristics of ammonia in a low-speed two-stroke marine engine. Fuel. 314:122727. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd’s Register. 2021. Exhaust gas cleaning systems: guidelines for the management of consumables and waste products. https://www.egcsa.com/wp-content/uploads/EGCSA-Handbook-2012-A5-size-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson M, Fridell E, Ingelsten HH. 2012. The influence of sulfur dioxide and water on the performance of a marine SCR catalyst. Appl Catal B Environ. 111–112:20–26. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAN Energy Solutions. 2018. 11.000 teu container vessel. An ME-GI powered vessel fitted with fuel gas supply system and boil-off gas handling. https://www.man-es.com/docs/default-source/document-sync/11-000-teu-container-vessel-eng.pdf?sfvrsn=9d6e1e01_2.
   Google Scholar
• Nadimi E, Przybyła G, Lewandowski MT, Adamczyk W. 2023. Effects of ammonia on combustion, emissions, and performance of the ammonia/diesel dual-fuel compression ignition engine. J Energy Inst 107:101158. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2022.101158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni P, Wang X, Li H. 2020. A review on regulations, current status, effects and reduction strategies of emissions for marine diesel engines. Fuel 279:118477. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niels de Vries. 2019. Safe and effective application of ammonia as a marine fuel.
   Google Scholar
• Panasiuk I, Turkina L. 2015. The evaluation of investments efficiency of SOx scrubber installation. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 40:87–96. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlenko N, Comer B, Zhou Y, Clark N, Rutherford D. 2020. The climate implications of using LNG as a marine fuel. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/Climate_implications_LNG_marinefuel_01282020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Yuan C, Tang J, Tang X. 2019. Techno-economic analysis of PV systems integrated into ship power grid: a case study. Energy Convers Manag. 198:111925. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinas O, Stefanakos CN. 2014. Selecting technologies towards compliance with MARPOL Annex VI: the perspective of operators. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 28:28–40. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddiek IS, Ammar NR. 2023. Technical and eco-environmental analysis of blue/green ammonia-fueled RO/RO ships. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 114:103547. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddiek IS, Elgohary MM. 2014. Eco-friendly selection of ship emissions reduction strategies with emphasis on SOx and NOx emissions. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 6:737–748. doi:10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ship & Bunker. 2024. Average bunker prices. [accessed 2024 Mar 1]. https://shipandbunker.com/prices/av.
   Google Scholar
• Silva RA, West JJ, Lamarque J-F, Shindell DT, Collins WJ, Dalsoren S, Faluvegi G, Folberth G, Horowitz LW, Nagashima T, et al. 2016. The effect of future ambient air pollution on human premature mortality to 2100 using output from the ACCMIP model ensemble. Atmos Chem Phys. 16:9847–9862. doi:10.5194/acp-16-9847-2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S&P. 2024. Interactive: Ammonia price chart | S&P Global Commodity Insights. [accessed 2024 April 1]. https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/051023-interactive-ammonia-price-chart-natural-gas-feedstock-europe-usgc-black-sea.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2020. Ammonia: zero-carbon fertiliser, fuel and energy store. The Royal Society London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Trivyza NL, Rentizelas A, Theotokatos G. 2018. A novel multi-objective decision support method for ship energy systems synthesis to enhance sustainability. Energy Convers Manage. 168:128–149. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trozzi C. 2010. Emission estimate methodology for maritime navigation. 9th International Emissions Inventory Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2017. Review of maritime transport 2017. United Nations 1–25. doi:10.18356/e9e3b605-en.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhamme E. 2016. Assessment of fuel oil availability final report. July.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rheenen ES, Padding JT, Slootweg JC, Visser K. 2023. Hydrogen carriers for zero-emission ship propulsion using PEM fuel cells: an evaluation. J Mar Eng Technol 1–18. doi:10.1080/20464177.2023.2282691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wärtsilä. 2014. Wärtsilä gas-fired engines. https://www.wartsila.com/docs/default-source/energy-docs/technology-products/brochures/gas-and-multi-fuel-power-plants.pdf?sfvrsn=6f4dbb45_22.
   Google Scholar
• Woo SH, Raza H, Kang WM, Choe SB, Im MH, Lim KS, Nam JG, Kim H. 2023. An ammonia supplying system using ammonium salt to reduce the NOx emissions of a 1.1 MW marine engine. J Mar Eng Technol. 22:45–54. doi:10.1080/20464177.2022.2127402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P-C, Lin C-Y. 2020. Cost-benefit evaluation on promising strategies in compliance with low sulfur policy of IMO. J Mar Sci Eng. 9:3. doi:10.3390/jmse9010003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Chen A, Xiao H, Jano-Ito M, Alnaeli M, Alnajideen M, Mashruk S, Valera-Medina A. 2023. Emission reduction and cost-benefit analysis of the use of ammonia and green hydrogen as fuel for marine applications. Green Energy Resour. 1:100046. doi:10.1016/j.gerr.2023.100046.
   Google Scholar
• Yang ZL, Zhang D, Caglayan O, Jenkinson ID, Bonsall S, Wang J, Huang M, Yan XP. 2012. Selection of techniques for reducing shipping NOx and SOx emissions. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 17:478–486. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanobetti F, Pio G, Jafarzadeh S, Muñoz Ortiz M, Cozzani V. 2023. Decarbonization of maritime transport: sustainability assessment of alternative power systems. J Clean Prod. 417:137989. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Zhou D, Yang W, Qian Y, Mao Y, Lu X. 2023. Investigation on the potential of using carbon-free ammonia in large two-stroke marine engines by dual-fuel combustion strategy. Energy. 263:125748. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Li KX, Lin KC, Shi W, Yang J. 2020. How can shipowners comply with the 2020 global sulphur limit economically? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 79:102234. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zis T, Angeloudis P, Bell MGH, Psaraftis HN. 2016. Payback period for emissions abatement alternatives: role of regulation and fuel prices. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2549:37–44. doi:10.3141/2549-05.
   Google Scholar