A deep learning approach to analyse ship inspection reports via natural language processing integrated with artificial neural network

References

• Ahmed N, Ahammed R, Islam MM, Uddin MA, Akhter A, Talukder MAA, Paul BK. 2021. Machine learning based diabetes prediction and development of smart web application. Int J Cogn Comput Eng. 2:229–241. doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2021.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik M. 2014. Utilisation of cognitive map in modelling human error in marine accident analysis and prevention. Saf Sci. 70:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaloul WS, Musarat MA, Liew MS, Qureshi AH, Maqsoom A. 2021. Investigating the impact of inflation on labour wages in Construction Industry of Malaysia. Ain Shams Eng J. 12:1575–1582. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). n.d. https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/other/142_investigationofmarineincidents/pub142_analysis_map.pdf [WWW Document].
   Google Scholar
• Asteris PG, Mokos VG. 2020. Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. 32:11807–11826. doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04663-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın O, Celik M, Bicen S, Bayer D. 2022. Systematic analysis of multi-source inspection database via ship smart audit system. Trans Marit Sci. 11. doi:10.7225/toms.v11.n02.w01.
   Google Scholar
• Benbarrad T, Salhaoui M, Kenitar SB, Arioua M. 2021. Intelligent machine vision model for defective product inspection based on machine learning. J Sens Actuator Netw. 10:7. doi:10.3390/jsan10010007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicen S, Celik M. 2022a. A bibliometric review on maritime inspection analysis: Current and future insights. doi:10.1177/14750902221119341.
   Google Scholar
• Bicen S, Celik M. 2022b. A hybrid approach to near-miss report investigation towards next-generation safety solutions on-board ships. Ocean Eng. 266:112768. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolat F, Alpaslan S. 2021. Cumulative analysis of port state control based on Paris MOU inspections. Trans Marit Sci. 10:224–246. doi:10.7225/toms.v10.n01.019.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzary H, Chen FF, Shahin M. 2021. Natural language processing for comprehensive service composition in cloud manufacturing systems. Procedia Manuf. 55:343–349. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.048.
   Google Scholar
• Bye RJ, Aalberg AL. 2018. Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 176:174–186. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariou P, Mejia MQ, Wolff FC. 2007. An econometric analysis of deficiencies noted in port state control inspections. Marit Policy Manag. 34:243–258. doi:10.1080/03088830701343047.
   Google Scholar
• Cebi S, Celik M, Cicek K. 2009. Prioritization of the VIQ items within SIRE program for an oil tanker ship. 2009 International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, CIE 2009 449–452. doi:10.1109/iccie.2009.5223890.
   Google Scholar
• Chuah LF, Mokhtar K, Bakar AA, Othman MR, Osman NH, Bokhari A, Mubashir M, Abdullah MA, Hasan M. 2022. Marine environment and maritime safety assessment using Port State Control database. Chemosphere. 304:135245. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicek K, Kurtel G. 2022. A quantified ship condition inspection model based on SWARA and SAW. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 1–36. doi:10.1142/S0219622022500717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Allen EE, Heckman R. 2012. Using natural language processing technology for qualitative data analysis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 15:523–543. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.625764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh AH, Sharshir SW, Abd Elaziz M, Kabeel AE, Guilan W, Haiou Z. 2019. Modeling of solar energy systems using artificial neural network: A comprehensive review. Sol Energy. 180:622–639. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filom S, Amiri AM, Razavi S. 2022. Applications of machine learning methods in port operations – A systematic literature review. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev. 161:102722. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2022.102722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Chen X, Wu S, Shi C, Wu H, Zhao J, Xiong P. 2020. Mining ship deficiency correlations from historical port state control (PSC) inspection data. PLoS One. 15:e0229211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan L, Ye B, Huang Z, Xu Y, Chen Q, Shu Y. 2023. Knowledge graph construction based on ship collision accident reports to improve maritime traffic safety. Ocean Coast Manag. 240:106660. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbic L, ēulin J, Perkovic T. 2018. Sire inspections on Oil tankers. TransNav, Int J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp. 12:359–362. doi:10.12716/1001.12.02.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao J, Ho TK. 2019. Machine Learning Made Easy: A Review of Scikit-learn Package in Python Programming Language. J Educ Behav Stat. 44:348–361. doi:10.3102/1076998619832248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heij C, Bijwaard GE, Knapp S. 2011. Ship inspection strategies: Effects on maritime safety and environmental protection. Transport Res Part D: Transp Environ. 16:42–48. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig L, Stahlbock R, Voß S. 2020. From digitalization to data-driven decision making in container terminals. Oper Res/Comput Sci Interfaces Ser. 64:125–154. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39990-0_6.
   Google Scholar
• Hellton KH, Tveten M, Stakkeland M, Engebretsen S, Haug O, Aldrin M. 2022. Real-time prediction of propulsion motor overheating using machine learning. J Mar Eng Technol. 21:334–342. doi:10.1080/20464177.2021.1978745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibragim AS. 2021. Comparative analysis of artificial neural networks and multi-agent systems. News of the Kabardin-Balkar Scientific Center of RAS. 1(99):20–27. doi:10.35330/1991-6639-2021-1-99-20-27.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail M, Suhrab R, Abdullah M, Sayed A, Muniandy TD, Faizal A, Fuad A, Said MH, Ahmed T. 2022. Ship detention factors under port state control in Malaysia. Specialusis Ugdymas/Special Education. 2022:1.
   Google Scholar
• Kececi T, Arslan O. 2017. SHARE technique: A novel approach to root cause analysis of ship accidents. Saf Sci. 96:1–21. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Te, Nazir S, Øvergård KI. 2016. A STAMP-based causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident. Saf Sci. 83:93–101. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan H, Ma X, Qiao W, Ma L. 2022. On the causation of seafarers’ unsafe acts using grounded theory and association rule. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 223:108498. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazakis I, Dikis K, Michala AL, Theotokatos G. 2016. Advanced ship systems condition monitoring for enhanced inspection, maintenance and decision making in ship operations. Transp Res Procedia. 14:1679–1688. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.133.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SK, Kim B, Huh M, Park J, Kang S, Cho S, Lee D, Lee D. 2014. Knowledge discovery in inspection reports of marine structures. Expert Syst Appl. 41:1153–1167. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Chen Y, Shang Y. 2022. A review of industrial big data for decision making in intelligent manufacturing. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 29:101021. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Alipour M, Harris DK. 2021. Context-aware sequence labeling for condition information extraction from historical bridge inspection reports. Adv Eng Inf. 49:101333. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2021.101333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moan T. 2005. Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 1:33–62. doi:10.1080/15732470412331289314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munim ZH, Dushenko M, Jimenez VJ, Shakil MH, Imset M. 2020. Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: a bibliometric review and future research directions. 47(5):577–597. doi:10.1080/03088839.2020.1788731.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW. 2011. Natural language processing: An introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 18:544–551. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas de Maya B, Arslan O, Akyuz E, Kurt RE, Turan O. 2022. Application of data-mining techniques to predict and rank maritime non-conformities in tanker shipping companies using accident inspection reports. Ships Offsh Struct. 17:687–694. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1862530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel JF, Murta L, Braganholo V, Freire J. 2019. A large-scale study about quality and reproducibility of jupyter notebooks. IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories 2019-May. 507–517. doi:10.1109/MSR.2019.00077.
   Google Scholar
• Ren J. 2012. ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Knowl Based Syst. 26:144–153. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa JPS, Guerra DJD, Horta NCG, Martins RMF, Lourenço NCC. 2020. Overview of Artificial Neural Networks. SpringerBr Appl Sci Technol. 458:21–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35743-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Rose RL, Puranik TG, Mavris DN. 2020. Natural language processing based method for clustering and analysis of aviation safety narratives. Aerospace. 7:1–22. doi:10.3390/aerospace7100143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy K, Debdas S, Kundu S, Chouhan S, Mohanty S, Biswas B. 2021. Application of natural language processing in healthcare. Comput Intell Healthc Inform. ch(21):393–407. doi:10.1002/9781119818717.ch21.
   Google Scholar
• Tixier AJP, Hallowell MR, Rajagopalan B, Bowman D. 2016. Automated content analysis for construction safety: A natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports. Autom Constr. 62:45–56. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trappey AJC, Trappey CV, Wu JL, Wang JWC. 2020. Intelligent compilation of patent summaries using machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Adv Eng Inf. 43:101027. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2019.101027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneschi L, Silva S. 2023. Artificial Neural Networks. Nat Comput Ser. 161–204. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17922-8_7.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilakes J, Zhou S, Zhang R. 2020. Natural language processing. Mach Learn Cardiovasc Med. 123–148. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-820273-9.00006-3.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Liu Z, Wang X, Graham T, Wang J. 2021. An analysis of factors affecting the severity of marine accidents. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 210:107513. doi:10.1016/J.RESS.2021.107513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhuang L, Shi L, Zhang S. 2023. A model of maritime accidents prediction based on multi-factor time series analysis. J Mar Eng Technol. 22:153–165. doi:10.1080/20464177.2023.2167269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Yan R, Qu X. 2019. Development of a non-parametric classifier: Effective identification, algorithm, and applications in port state control for maritime transportation. Transp Res B, Methodol. 128:129–157. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Wang G, Lin KC, Qi G, Li KX. 2020. The effectiveness of the New inspection regime for port state control: application of the Tokyo MoU. Mar Policy. 115:103857. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan R, Wang S. 2019. Ship Inspection by Port State Control—Review of Current Research. Smart Innov, Syst Technol. 149:233–241. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8683-1_24.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Yang Z, Yin J. 2018. Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 110:38–56. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn IH, Kim SC. 2019. Preventive maintenance topic models for LNG containment systems of LNG marine carriers using dock specifications. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 9, 1202. doi:10.3390/app9061202.
   Google Scholar