Teachers’ perception of the response to intervention implementation feasibility in Chinese inclusive early childhood education

References

• American Association of School Administrators. 2010. Response to intervention adoption survey 2010. Available at: http://sss.usf.edu/resources/presentations/2010/fasp_summer_inst2010/Resource_SLD/RTI/2010RTIAdoptionSurveyReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balu, R., Zhu, P., Doolittle, F., Schiller, E., Jenkins, J. and Gersten, R. 2015. Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading (NCEE 2016-4000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey, R. 2007. No more “waiting to fail”: How Response to Intervention works and why it is needed. Educational Leadership, 65, 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Buysse, V. and Peisner-Feinberg, E. 2010. Recognition & response: Response to intervention for pre-K. Young Exceptional Children, 13, 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., Li, A. and Wang, Y. 2016. An investigation into the present inclusive education curriculum in general pre-service teacher education programs in China [Woguo putong shifan zhuanye ronghe jiaoyu kecheng xianzhuang de diaocha yanjiu]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 1, 9–15
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M. L., Joseph, G. E. and Strain, P. S. 2003. The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58, 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. and Compton, D.L. 2012. Smart RTI: A next generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. 2016. Chinese 13th five-year plan for improving the well-being of people with disabilities. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-08/17/content_5100132.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. 1991. Conceptualizing behavior disorders in terms of resistance to intervention. School Psychology Review, 20, 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. 2002. Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson and D. P. Hallahan, eds. Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp.467–519.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, M., Bucholz, J. L., Goodman, J. I., Duffy, M. L. and Brady, M. P. 2010. Response to intervention: General or special education? Who is responsible? Educational Forum, 75, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• He, L. and Zhang, L. 2014. Response to Intervention model: A new model of inclusive early childhood education in the United States [Ganyu fanying moshi: Meiguo zaoqi ronghe jiaoyu xin moshi]. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition), 2, 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A. and Dexter, D. D. 2011. Response to intervention: A research-based summary. Theory Into Practice, 50, 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Betz, R. G., Vail, C. O. and Chai, Z. 2013. Examining response to intervention using a framework of best practice from early childhood special education. Exceptionality, 21, 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, K. and Bai, X. 2017. Development report on the cause for persons with disabilities in China, [Zhongguo canjiren shiye fazhan baogao]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. Liu, C. and Gerber. M. 2013. How to help students with learning disabilities have more improvements: RTI model in the U.S. and its inspiration [Ruhe rang xuexi zhangai xuesheng genghao de jinbu: Meiguo RTI moshi jiqi qishi]. Studies in Foreign Education, 3, 106–114.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, M. P., Pate, J. L., Gibson, N. M., Hilgert, L., Hull, K. and Campbell, P. C. 2016. A quantitative examination of school leadership and response to intervention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinen, O. P., Savolainen, H. and Xu, J. 2013. Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices among mainland Chinese pre-service teachers. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 16, 82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mellard, D. F., Stern, A. and Woods, K. 2011. RTI school-based practices and evidence-based models. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mu, X. and Zan F. 2011. The model of response to the children with learning difficulties who has special education needs in America - The model of RTI [Meiguo teshu ertong xueye kunnan fanying moshi-RTI moshi]. Studies in Foreign Education, 38, 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention. 2010. Essential components of RTI: A closer look at Response to Intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention. Available at: http://www.cldinternational.org/Articles/rtiessentialcomponents.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, U., Loreman, T. and Forlin, C. 2012. Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. 2007. Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within Response to Intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S., Liang, Y. and Zhao, J. 2006. An action research on inclusive education of exceptional young children in ChongQing [Chongqingshi teshu youer ronghe jiaoyu xingdong yanjiu baogao]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 68, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, J., Song, G. and Sun, Y. 2015. A review of specific learning disabilities assessment models. [Teding xuexi zhangai pinggu moshi zongshu]. Modern Special Education, 12, 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. 2017. The complaint procedures avenue of the IDEA: Has the road less traveled by made all the difference? Journal of Special Education Leadership, 30, 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. 2018. Response to Intervention and child find: A legally problematic intersection? Exceptional Children, 84, 368–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar