Using the virtual-representational instructional sequence to support the acquisition and maintenance of mathematics for students with intellectual disability

References

• Agrawal, J., and Morin, L. L. 2016. Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto, P., and Troutman, A. 2009. Applied behavior analysis for teachers. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., and Hitch, G. J. 2006. Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Bassette, L., Taber-Doughty, T., Flanagan, S. M., and Szwed, K. 2009. Pentop computers as tools for teaching multiplication to students with MID. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 367–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Chamberlain, C., and Park, J. 2017. Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 317–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., and Park, J. 2018. Mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 41, 65–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Satsangi, R., Cwiasksi, K., and Levy, K. 2019. Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to support acquisition of algebra. Journal of Special Education Technology. Advanced Online Publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., and Whorley, A. 2018. Using the virtual-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability in mathematics. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33, 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Sprick, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., and Whorley, A. 2017. Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to teach addition of fractions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., and Courtney, W. T. 2014. Virtual and concrete manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 180–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., and Park, J. 2018. The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainingcamp, 2018. Color tiles manipulative. Available at: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/color-tiles-manipulative/id656246736
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., and Alexeev, N. 2011. Fluency, accuracy, and gender predict developmental trajectories of arithmetic strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 617–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, M., Cates, D., Smith, M., and Jackson, C. 2003. Effects of manipulative instruction on solving area and perimeter problems by students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 112–120.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, B. C. 2012. Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2019. Standards for mathematical practice. Available at: http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, A. J. 2007. KeyMath-3 diagnostic assessment. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., and Gast, D. L. 1988. System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, A. K., and Robinson, K. M. 2018. Children’s understanding of multiplication and division: Insights from a pooled analysis of seven studies conducted across 7 years. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36, 206–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. M., Hinton, V. M., and Schweck, K. B. 2014. Teaching multiplication with regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., and Goldstone, R. L. 2014. Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., and Ledford, J. R. 2014. Single case research methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., and Bailey, D. H. 2012. Fact retrieval deficits in low achieving children and children with mathematical learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 291–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, H. J. 1983. Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
   Google Scholar
• Haring, N. G., and Eaton, M. D. 1978. Systematic instructional technology: An instructional hierarchy. In: N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, and C. L. Hansen, eds. The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Merrill, pp. 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. A., Miller, S. P., and Mercer, C. D. 1995. Teaching initial multiplication skills to students with disabilities in general education classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 180–195.
   Google Scholar
• Hayter, S., Scott, E., McLaughlin, T. F., and Weber, K. P. 2007. The use of a modified direct instruction flashcard system with two high school students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 19, 409–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hord, C., and Bouck, E. C. 2012. A review of academic mathematics instruction for students with mild intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A., DiPipi, C. M., and Perron-Jones, N. 2002. An exploratory student of schema-based word problem-solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Nelson, G., Pulles, S. M., Kiss, A. J., and Houseworth, J. 2016. Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematical difficulties? Exceptional Children, 83, 8–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Chard, D. J., and Fien, H. 2008. Making connections in mathematics: Conceptual mathematics intervention for low performing students. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafay, A., Osana, H. P., and Valat, M. 2019. Effects of interventions with manipulatives on immediate learning, maintenance, and transfer in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A systematic review. Education Research International, 2019, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marita, S., and Hord, C. 2017. Reviews of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, J. H., Flores, M. M., Moore, A. J., Taylor, J. J., and Burton, M. E. 2019. Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teach conceptual understanding of basic multiplication and division. Learning Disability Quarterly, 42, 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008. Foundations for success: Final report of the national math advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S. F., and Lee, K. 2009. The model method: Singapore children’s tools for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 282–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., and Nunes, T. 2001. The development of the concept of multiplication. Cognitive Development, 16, 763–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., and Fuchs, D. 2013. Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the common core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, S., and Mallow, L. 2009. Using simultaneous prompting procedure to promote recall of multiplication facts by middle school students with cognitive impairment. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. 2014. Working towards a child friendly’ written progression for division. Mathematics Teaching, 240, 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D. 2015. Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sante, A. D., McLaughlin, T. F., and Weber, K. P. 2001. The use and evaluation of a direct instruction flash card strategy on multiplication math facts mastery with two students with developmental disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 17, 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Satsangi, R., and Bouck, E. C. 2015. Using virtual manipulative instruction to teach the concepts of area and perimeter to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 174–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satsangi, R., and Miller, B. 2017. The case for adopting virtual manipulatives in mathematics education for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61, 303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalock, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Buntinx, W., Coulter, D., Craig, E., and Yeager, M. 2010. Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. 11th ed. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, K., Gebhardt, M., and Maehler, C. 2010. Working memory functions in children with different degrees of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 346–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shurr, J., Jimenez, B., and Bouck, E. C. 2019. Maintenance. In: J. Shurr, B. Jimenez, and E. C. Bouck, eds. Research-based practices and instructional information for students with autism and intellectual disability (pp. 35–46). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, Fred., Knight, Victoria F., Browder, Diane M., Smith, Bethany R.. 2012. Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6) 374–387. doi:10.1177/0741932511421634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroizer, S., Hinton, V., Flores, M., and Terry, L. 2015. An investigation of the effects of CRA instruction and students with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., and Adiguzel, T. 2016. Single case research: Web-based calculator for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 2002. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-III. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 2004. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. London: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 2014. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• White, O. R., and Haring, N. G. 1980. Exceptional teaching. 2nd ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, J., and Montague, M. 2002. Meeting the challenge of mathematics reform for students with LD. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yell, M. 2019. The law and special education. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar