Robot programming for a child with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study

References

• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cabibihan, J. J., Javed, H., Ang, M. and Aljunied, S. M. 2013. Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 593–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. P., Charpiot, L., Lera, F. R., Ziafati, P., Nazarikhorram, A., Van Der Torre, L. and Steffgen, G. 2018. More attention and less repetitive and stereotyped behaviors using a robot with children with autism. 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), NanJing- Tai’An, China, pp. 534–539, August.
   Google Scholar
• Feil-Seifer, D. and Matarić, M. J. 2009. Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: O. Khatib, V. Kumar, and G. J. Pappas, eds. Experimental robotics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, S. and Dunsmuir, S. 2015. The inclusion of children with ASD: Using the theory of planned behaviour as a theoretical framework to explore peer attitudes. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62, 405–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K. H. and Huang, P. L. 2011. Lego robotics and group learning: Exploring the effects of gender, age, and family background. In: 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, pp.219–222.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, L. I., Shamsudin, S., Yussof, H., Hanapiah, F. A. and Zahari, N. I. 2012. Robot-based intervention program for autistic children with humanoid robot NAO: Initial response in stereotyped behavior. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1441–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S. and Mondada, F. 2015. A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education? In: 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO). IEEE, pp.1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T. J. and Odell, M. R. 2014. Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25, 246–258.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R. and Scassellati, B. 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1038–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozima, H., Michalowski, M. P. and Nakagawa, C. 2009. Keepon: A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legoff, D. B. and Sherman, M. 2006. Long-term outcome of social skills intervention based on interactive LEGO# play. Autism : The International Journal of Research and Practice, 10, 317–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. and Hounsell, K. G. 2017. Adapting a robotics program to enhance participation and interest in STEM among children with disabilities: A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12, 694–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, T., Knott, F. and Dunlop, A. W. 2007. Developing social interaction and understanding in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A groupwork intervention. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalek, A. M., Phalen, L., Bobzien, J. L., Chen, C. H., Urbano, M., Hartmann, K., Okwara, L., Gorrepati, P., Deutsch, S. and Williams, T. 2020. Using a STEM activity to improve social communication interactions in autism spectrum disorder. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 65, 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S. and Pioggia, G. 2016. Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9, 165–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorato, F., Przybylowski, L. and Sarko, D. K. 2017. Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: Enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 90, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaradozzi, D., Screpanti, L. and Cesaretti, L. 2019. Towards a definition of educational robotics: A classification of tools, experiences and assessments. In: Smart learning with educational robotics. Cham: Springer, pp.63–92.
   Google Scholar
• Scassellati, B., Admoni, H. and Mataric’, M. 2012. Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sırakaya, M. and Alsancak Sırakaya, D. 2020. Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 1556–1569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staal, W. G. 2015. Autism, DRD3 and repetitive and stereotyped behavior, an overview of the current knowledge. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25, 1421–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syriopoulou-Delli, C. K. and Gkiolnta, E. 2022. Review of assistive technology in the training of children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68, 73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiger, J. H., Toussaint, K. A. and Kliebert, M. L. 2009. Rituals and Stereotypies. In: J. L. Matson, ed. Applied behavior analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders. New York, NY: Springer, pp.145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Virnes, M., Sutinen, E. and Kärnä-Lin, E. 2008. How children’s individual needs challenge the design of educational robotics. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp.274–281.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, T. T., Mason, L. L. and Gomez, A. 2014. Collaborative robotics projects for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29, 51–62.
   Google Scholar