References
- Curtis C. Possible use of translocations to fix desirable genes in insect pest populations. Nature. 1968;218:368–369.10.1038/218368a0
- http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/quality-framework/technical-notes/concept-of-governance/
- National Research Council. Animal biotechnology: science based concerns. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2002. https://doi.org/10.17226/10418.
- https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tjri20/5/sup1?nav=tocList
- Najjar DA, Normandin AM, Strait EA, et al. Driving towards ecotechnologies. Pathog Global Health. 2018;111(8):448–458. DOI:10.1080/20477724.2018.1452844.
- Krishnan P, Gillum D. Gene Drive 101: a basic guidance resource for biosafety professionals. J ABSA Int. 2017;22:1–4. DOI:10.1177/1535676017731318.
- Benedict MQ, Burt A, Capurro ML, De Barro P, Handler AM, Hayes KR, et al. Recommendations for Laboratory Containment and Management of Gene Drive Systems in Arthropods. Vector-borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18:2–13. DOI:10.1089/vbz.2017.2121.
- Quinlan MM, Birungi J, Coulibaly MB, Diabate A, Facchinelli L, Mukabana R, et al. Containment studies of transgenic mosquitoes in disease endemic countries: the broad concept of facilities readiness. Vector-borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017 (2018);18:14–20.
- Evans SW, Palmer MF. Anomaly handling and the politics of gene drives. J Responsible Innovation. 2017;5(sup1):S223–S242. DOI:10.1080/23299460.2017.1407911.
- https://www.rivm.nl/en/Documents_and_publications/Scientific/Reports/2016/februari/Gene_drives_Policy_report
- https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides
- Finkel AM. Demystifying evidence-based policy analysis by revealing hidden value-laden constraints. Hastings Center Rep. 2018;48(1):S21–S49. DOI:10.1002/hast.818.
- Paarlberg R. The politics of precaution: genetically modified crops in developing countries. Baltimore and London: Int. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001.
- Rodemeyer M. New life, old bottles: regulation first-generation products of synthetic biology. Washington (DC): Synthetic Biology Project, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; 2009.
- Morgan G. Risk analysis and mangement. Scientific American. 1993; 269:32–41. DOI: 10.1038.
- Thompson PB. The roles of ethics in gene drive research and governance. J Responsible Innovation. 2018;5:S1 159–179.
- Jasanoff S. The ethics of invention: technology and the human future. New York (NY): W.W. Norton & Company; 2016. Copy at http://www.tinyurl.com/m7bqqd6
- McCray L, Oye KA, Petersen AC. Planned adpatation in risk regulation: An inital survey of US environmental, health, and safety regulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2010;77:951–959.10.1016/j.techfore.2009.12.001
- Eichler HG, Oye KA, et al. Adaptive licensing: taking the next step in the evolution of drug approval. Nat Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;345:426–437.10.1038/clpt.2011.345
- Oye KA, Baird LG, Chia A, et al. Legal foundations of adaptive licensing. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2013;94:309–311.
- Juma C. Innovation and its enemies. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467036.001.0001
- https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/ucm466214.htm
- https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/aquadvantage-salmon.html
- https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/UCM466218.pdf
- Canadian Food Inspection Service. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/food/labelling/food-labelling-for-industry/method-of-production-claims/genetically-engineered-foods/eng/1333373177199/1333373638071
- Hartley S, Pearce W, Taylor A. Against the tide of depoliticization: the politics of research governance. Policy & Politics. 2017;45:361–377.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Preparing for future products of biotechnology. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.17226/24605
- Press release dated December 4, 2017, found at http://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-drive-files
- National Research Council. Animal biotechnology: science based concerns. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2002. https://doi.org/10.17226/10418
- World Health Organization. The Guidance Framework for testing genetically modified mosquitoes. 2014. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2014/guide-fmrk-gm-mosquit/en/
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2016. https://doi.org/10.17226/23405
- Renn O. Concepts of risk: A classification. In: Krimsky S, Golding D, editors. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger.; 1992. p. 53–79.
- Mathematical Ecology Research Group Oxford University. https://merg.zoo.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/GeneDrivePolicyBrief_ONLINE.pdf
- National Research Council. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process working papers. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 1983. https://doi.org/10.17226/776
- Zenter GE, Wade MJ. The promise and peril of CRISPR gene drives. Bioessays. 2017;39:1700109
- Schimenti J. Segregation distortion of mouse t-haplotypes: the molecular basis emerges. Trends Genet. 2000;16:240–243.10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02020-5
- Beeman RW, Friesen K. Properties and natural occurrence of maternal-effect selfish genes (‘Medea’ factors) in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Heredity. 1999;82:529–534.10.1038/sj.hdy.6885150
- Werren JH. Biology of Wolbachia. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:587–609.10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.587
- Schnable PS, Wise RP. The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3:174–179.
- https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/epa-registers-wolbachia-zap-strain-live-male-asian-tiger-mosquitoes
- Champer J, Buchman A, Akbari OS. Cheating Evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:146–159.10.1038/nrg.2015.34
- Burt A, Crisanti A. Gene drives: evolved and synthetic. ACS Chem Bio. 2018;13:343–346.
- Marshall JM, Akbari OA. Can CRISPR-based gene drive be confined in the wild? A question for molecular and population biology. ACS Chem Biol. 2018;13:424–430. DOI:10.1021/aschembio.7b00923.
- Marshall JM, Hay B. General principles of single-construct chromosomal gene drive. Evolution. 2012;66(7):2150–2166.10.1111/evo.2012.66.issue-7
- Marshall JM, Akbari OS. Can CRISPR-based gene drive be confined in the wild? A question for molecular and population biology. bioRxiV. 2017. DOI:10.1101/173914
- Vella MR, Gunning CE, Lloyd AL et al. Evaluating strategies for reversing CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11038 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-10633-2
- Esvelt KM. http://www.sculptingevolution.org/genedrives/genedrivefaq
- Edgington MP, Alphey LS. Conditions for success of engineered underdominance gene drive systems. J Theor Biol. 2017;430:128–140.10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.014
- Drury DW, Dapper A, Siniard DJ, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 gene drives in genetically variable and nonrandomly mating wild populations. Sci Adv. 2017;3:31601910.
- Unkless RL, Clark AG, Messer PW. Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive. Genetics. 2017;205:827–841.
- Bull JJ, Malik HS. The gene drive bubble: new realities. PLos Genet. 2017;13(7):310006850.
- Matthews BJ, Dudchenko O, Kingan S, et al. Improved Aedes aegypti mosquito reference genome assembly enables biological discovery and vector control. 2017. bioRxiv first posted online 12/29/2017 [cited 2018 Mar 25]. DOI:10.1101/240747.
- Oye KA, Esvelt K, Appleton E, et al. Regulating gene drives. Science. 2014;345:626–628.10.1126/science.1254287
- Akbari OS, Bellen H, Bier E, et al. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. Science. 2015;349:927–929.10.1126/science.aac7932
- DiCarlo JE, Chavez A, Dietz SL, et al. Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(12):1250–1255. DOI:10.1038/nbt.3412.
- Carter S, Friedman R. Policy and Regulatory Issues for Gene drives in Insects. Workshop Report 2016. J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla. http://www.jcvi.org/cms/fileadmin/site/research/projects/gene-drive-workshop/report-complete.pdf
- Adelman Z, Akbari O, Bauer J, et al. Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing. Nature Biotechnol. 2017;35:716–718.10.1038/nbt.3926
- Australian Academy of Science. Synthetic gene drives in Australia: implications of emerging technologies. 2017. https://www.science.org.au/support/analysis/reports/synthetic-gene-drives-australia-implications-emerging-technologies
- Royal Society of Canada. The Academies of Arts, Humanities, and Sciences of Canada. 2016. [cited 2017 Dec 05]. https://rsc-src.ca/en/report-from-abroad/genes-in-fast-lane-implications-new-gene-drive-technology
- The Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board. Bioteknologiradet. Statement on Gene Drives; 2017. http://www.bioteknologiradet.no/filarkiv/2017/02/Statement-on-gene-drives.pdf
- Westra J, van der Vlugt CJB, Roesink CH, et al. Gene drives: Policy Report. 2016. PIVM report 2016-0023 [cited 2017 Sep 20]. http://www.rivm.nl/en/Documents_and_publications/Scientific/Reports/2016/februari/Gene_drives_Policy_report
- Lunshof JE, Birnbaum Angela. Adaptive risk management of gene drive experiments; Biosafety, biosecurity, and ethics. Appl Biosafety J ABSA Int. 2017;22:97–103.10.1177/1535676017721488
- Marshall JM, Hay BA. Confinement of gene drive systems to local populations: a comparative analysis. J Theor Biol. 2012;294:153–171.10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.10.032
- Benedict MQ, Burt A, Capurro ML, et al. Recommendations for Laboratory Containment and Management of Gene Drive Systems in Arthropods. Vector-borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18:2–13. DOI:10.1089/vbz.2017.2121.
- Quinlan MM, Birungi J, Coulibaly MB, Diabate A, Facchinelli L, Mukabana R, et al. Containment studies of transgenic mosquitoes in disease endemic countries: the broad concept of facilities readiness. Vector-borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2017 (2018);18:14–20.
- [cited 2017 Oct 29]. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2014/guide-fmrk-gm-mosquit/en/
- Simis MJ, Madden H, Cacciatore MA, et al. The lure of rationality: why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding Sci. 2016;25(4):400–414.
- Kahan D, Peters E, Wittlin M, et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change. 2012;2:732–735.10.1038/nclimate1547
- Oye KA, Esvelt K, Appleton E, et al. Regulating gene drives. Science. 2014;345:626–628.10.1126/science.1254287
- WHO (World Health Organization) Vector Control Advisory Group. The Guidance Framework for Testing Genetically Modified Mosquitoes. World Health Organization, Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases [online]. 2014.
- Carter S, Friedman R. Policy and Regulatory Issues for Gene drives in Insects. Workshop Report 2016. J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla. http://www.jcvi.org/cms/fileadmin/site/research/projects/gene-drive-workshop/report-complete.pdf
- Adelman Zach, Akbari O, Bauer J, et al. Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(8):716–718.10.1038/nbt.3926
- Akbari O, Bellen HJ, Bier E, Bullock S, et al. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. 2015. Science. 2015;349:927–929.10.1126/science.aac7932
- Neuhaus CP, Caplan A. Ethical lessons from a tale of two genetically modified insects. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:713–716.
- Hartley S, Pearce W, Taylor A. Against the tide of depoliticization: the politics of research governance. Policy Politics. 2017;45:36–37.
- Douglas HE. The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility. Am Philos Q. 2003;40:59–68.
- http://crisprcon.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CRISPRcon-Summary.pdf
- http://targetmalaria.org
- https://www.darpa.mil/program/safe-genes
- https://www.koshland-science-museum.org/events/science-science-communication-iii-webcast; http://www.nasonline.org/programs/sackler-colloquia/completed_colloquia/
- http://www.nasonline.org/news-and-multimedia/news/Human-Genome-Editing-Report.html
- WHO (World Health Organization) Vector Control Advisory Group. The Guidance Framework for Testing Genetically Modified Mosquitoes. World Health Organization, Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases [online]. 2014.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2017. https://www.nap.edu/download/24623. DOI:10.17226/24623
- Murray J, Jansen CC, DeBarro P. Risk associated with the release of wolbachia-infected aedes aegypti mosquitoes into the environmental in an effort to control dengue. Front Public Health. 2016;4:1–12.
- Jasanoff S, Hurlbut J. A global observatory for gene editing. Nature. 2018;555:435–437.10.1038/d41586-018-03270-w
- Kunz M. Scientists should oppose the drive of postmodern ideology. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:943–945.
- Kuntz M. Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe. GM Crops & Food. 2012;3(4):258–264.10.4161/gmcr.21231
- Fagerström T, Dixelius C, Magnusson U, et al. Stop worrying; start growing. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:493–497.10.1038/embor.2012.59
- Press release dated December 4, 2017, found at http://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-drive-files
- Drive safely. Scientists must persist in pointing out the environmental dangers of gene editing. Nature. 2017;552:6.
- https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/IUCN-WCC-6th-005.pdf
- http://reviverestore.org
- September 9. 2016, [cited 2017 Nov 1]. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/could-genetically-modified-mosquitoes-save-hawaiis-endangered-birds
- https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/hisc/files/2013/02/HISC-Reso-17-2-signed.pdf
- Department of the Interior, National Invasive Species Council Innovation Summit Vision+Science+Technology=Solutions. 2016. Report. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/innovation_summit_report_2016.pdf
- https://targetmalaria.org/
- https://www.darpa.mil/program/safe-genes
- Esvelt K, Gemmell NJ. Conservation demands safe gene drives. PLOS Biol. Published online November 16, 2017. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.200385.
- Emerson C, James S, Littler K, et al. Principles for gene drive. Science. 2017; 358:1135–1136. DOI:10.1126/science.aap9026.ably.
- Marchant G, Wallach W. Coordinating Technology Governance. Issues Sci Technol 2015;31(4):43. http://issues.org/31-4/coordinating-technology-governance/
- Charo A. Yellow lights for emerging technologies. Science. 2015;349(6249):384–385.