Oxitec and MosquitoMate in the United States: lessons for the future of gene drive mosquito control

References

• Crawford JE, Clarke DW, Criswell V, et al. Efficient production of male Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes enables large-scale suppression of wild populations. Nature Biotechnology. 2020;38(4):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Zika Virus: potential Range in US. 2017 [ cited 2020 Jan 29]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/vector/range.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Terán M, Hofmann HC, Tweddle NE. Impact of Screwworm Eradication Programmes Using the Sterile Insect Technique. In: Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson A, editors. Sterile Insect Technique. Springer: Dordrecht; 2005: 629–650.
   Google Scholar
• Slatko BE, Luck, AN, Dobson, SL, et al. Wolbachia endosymbionts and human disease control. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195(2):88–95.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill SL. (2018) The use of Wolbachia by the World Mosquito Program to interrupt transmission of Aedes aegypti transmitted viruses. In: Hilgenfeld R and Vasudevan SG (eds) Dengue and Zika: Control and Antiviral Treatment Strategies. Springer: Singapore, 355–360.
   Google Scholar
• James S, Collins, FH, Welkhoff, PA, et al. Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations of a Scientific Working Group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(6_Suppl):1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Raban R, Akbari OS. Gene drives may be the next step towards sustainable control of malaria. Pathog Glob Health. 2017;111(8):399–400.
   Google Scholar
• Alphey L, McKemey, A, Nimmo, D, et al. Genetic control of Aedes mosquitoes. Pathog Glob Health. 2013;107(4):170–179.
   Google Scholar
• Jiggins FM. Open questions: how does Wolbachia do what it does? BMC Biol. 2016;14(1):92.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann JF, Bonneau M, Chen H, et al. The toxin–antidote model of cytoplasmic incompatibility: genetics and evolutionary implications. Trends in Genetics. 2019;35(3):175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Facchinelli L, Valerio, L, Ramsey, JM. Field cage studies and progressive evaluation of genetically-engineered mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Wise De Valdez MR, Nimmo, D, Betz, J, et al. Genetic elimination of dengue vector mosquitoes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011. 108( 12): 4772–4775.
   Google Scholar
• Pham TB, Phong, CH, Bennett, JB et al. Experimental population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(12):12.
   Google Scholar
• Bloss CS, Triplett C, Schairer C, Buchman A, Akbari O. Perceptions of genetic engineering to control vector-borne disease among California Residents. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities Annual Conference, October, 2019; Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaebnick GE, Heitman, Elizabeth E, Collins, James P, et al. Precaution and governance of emerging technologies. Science. 2016;354(6313):710–711.
   Google Scholar
• Schairer CE, Taitingfong, R, Akbari, OS, et al. A typology of community and stakeholder engagement based on documented examples in the field of novel vector control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(11):11.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Guidance framework for testing of genetically modified mosquitoes. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Adelman Z, Akbari O, Bauer J, et al. Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(8):716–718.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict M, Akbari, O, Bauer, J, et al. Guidance for contained field trials of vector mosquitoes engineered to contain a gene drive system: recommendations of a scientific working group. Vector-borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8(2):127–166.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Gene drives on the horizon: advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley S, Thizy, D, Ledingham, K, et al. Knowledge engagement in gene drive research for malaria control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4):e0007233.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. 1979, Washington, D.C.: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant GE, Allenby B. Soft law: new tools for governing emerging technologies. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2017;73(2):108–114.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology. 1986, Federal Register:
   Google Scholar
• United States of America National Archives. Administrative Procedure Act ( 5 U.S.C. Subchapter II, Section 553). 2017 [ cited 2020 Dec 4]; Available from: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/administrative-procedure/553.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rudenko L, Palmer MJ, Oye K. Considerations for the governance of gene drive organisms. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112(4):162–181.
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology Working Group, Modernizing the Regulatory System for Biotechnology Products: final Version of the 2017 Update to the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology. 2017, The Unified Website for Biotechnology Regulation: https://usbiotechnologyregulation.mrp.usda.gov/2017_coordinated_framework_update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United States of America National Archives. Federal Register. 2020 [ cited 2020 Apr 15]; Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Notice of Unconditional Pesticide Registration for EPA Registration No. 89668–4, ZAP Males and Final Product Label. 2017, Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0205–0033.
   Google Scholar
• Experimental Use Permits Applications, Amedments, and Issuances in “Mosquito Mate” Dockets 2012–2014. 2020 [ cited 2020 Dec 3]; Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/searchResults?rpp=25&so=ASC&sb=postedDate&po=0&s=%22mosquito%2Bmate%22&fp=true&dct=FR%2BPR%2BN%2BO.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt D. Florida releases experimental mosquitoes to fight Zika. . CNNcom. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Loria K, 20 million bacteria-infected mosquitoes are getting released into a California city by a division of Google’s parent company. 2017, [cited 2018 Jan 12]. http://www.businessinsider.com/wolbachia-mosquitoes-california-google-alphabet–2017–7.
   Google Scholar
• Doubek J, To Shrink Mosquito Populaiton, Scientists are Releasing 20 Million Mosquitoes. 2017, [cited 2020 Dec 4]. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/21/538470321/to-shrink-the-mosquito-population-scientists-are-releasing-20-million-of-them.
   Google Scholar
• Consolodated Mosquito Abatement District. Debug Fresno. 2019 [ cited 2020 Dec 3]; Available from: https://cmad.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=f90115bcf15943928fc82a79af89d71e.
   Google Scholar
• Verily. Introducing Debug Fresno. 2017 [ cited 2018 Feb 20]; Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVozrgEwi_Q.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Registration Decision of the New Active Ingredient Wolbachia pipentis ZAP(wPip) strain in Aedes albopictus. ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0205-0033. 2017, Regulations.gov: [cited 2020 Dec 7]. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0205–0033.
   Google Scholar
• MosquitoMate.com. 2020 [ cited 2020 Dec 3]; Available from: https://mosquitomate.com/?v=3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Parry H, Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Scinece, Space and Technology Committee: science of Zika: the DNA of an Epidemic. 2016
   Google Scholar
• Maxmen A. Florida abuzz over mosquito plan. Nature; 2012;487(7407):286.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Dewsbury B. Barriers to inclusive deliberation and democratic governance of genetic technologies at the science-policy interface. Journal of Science Communication. 2019;18(3):Y02.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz E. A face-lift for biotech rules begins. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;23(12):1221–1222.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry on Regulation of Genetically Engineered Animals Containing Heritable recombinant DNA Constructs, Guidance for Industry #187. Federal Register, 2009. 74(11).
   Google Scholar
• Beech C. Regulatory experience and challenges for the release of GM insects. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. 2014;9(1):71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cohrssen JJ, Miller HI. 2017 November. Current FDA approach to genetically engineered animals is flawed, The Hill, pp. 6. [cited 2017 Dec 19] http://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/358893-current-fda-approach-to-genetically-engineered-animals-is-flawed.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzma J. Policy: reboot the debate on genetic engineering. Nature. 2016;531(7593):165–167.
   Google Scholar
• Oye KA, et al. Regulating gene drives. Science. 2014;345(6197):626–628.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves RG, Denton, JA, Santucci, F, et al. Scientific standards and the regulation of genetically modified insects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(1):e1502.
   Google Scholar
• Kay J. 2016 May. Tell the FDA what you fear more: zika, or GMO mosquitoes? Assoicated Press, pp. 12. [cited 2017 Nov 9]. https://apnews.com/article/bb12a3bc40d249f791507fa7ac89b763.
   Google Scholar
• Glenza J. 2016 November. Genetically modified mosquitoes could be released in Florida Keys by spring; In fight against Zika, British company Oxitec must seek approval from FDA for insects’ release into the wild following Monroe County referendum, The Guardian, pp. 26. [cited 2019 April 22]. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/26/zika-virus-genetically-modified-mosquitoes-florida.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph A Florida Keys voters split on genetically modified mosquito trial. STAT 2016 Nov 8; Available from: https://www.statnews.com/2016/11/08/florida-keys-voters-split-on-genetically-modified-mosquitoes/.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley L Florida Keys Residents Resist Controversial GMO Mosquito Trial. 2016 [ cited 2019 May 24]; Available from: https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/florida-keys-residents-resist-controversial-gmo-mosquito-trial.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Keys Mosquito Control District. Town Hall Meeting on Genetically Modified Mosquitoes. 2012 [ cited 2021 Jan 13]; Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WQkM-yc7QI.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Keys Mosquito Control District. Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Town Hall Meeting. 2014 [ cited 2021 Jan 13]; Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO31wLQoCJ0.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst KC, Haenchen, S, Dickinson, K, et al. Awareness and support of release of genetically modified “sterile” mosquitoes, Key West, Florida, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):320–324.
   Google Scholar
• Adalja A, Sell, TK, McGinty, M, et al. Genetically modified (GM) mosquito use to reduce mosquito-transmitted disease in the US: a community opinion survey. PLoS Curr. 2016;8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.1c39ec05a743d41ee39391ed0f2ed8d3.
   Google Scholar
• Funk C, Hefferon M. Most Americans Accept Genetic Engineering of Animals that Benefits Human Health, but Many Oppose Other Uses. 2018. [cited 2018 oct 2]. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2018/08/16/most-americans-accept-genetic-engineering-of-animals-that-benefits-human-health-but-many-oppose-other-uses/. 
   Google Scholar
• Lull RB, Akin, H, Hallman, WK, et al. Modeling risk perceptions, benefit perceptions, and approval of releasing genetically engineered mosquitoes as a response to Zika virus. Environmental Communication. 2020;14(7):933–953.
   Google Scholar
• Bloss CS, Stoler, J, Brouwer, KC, et al. Public response to a proposed field trial of genetically engineered mosquitoes in the United States. Jama. 2017;318(7):662–664.
   Google Scholar
• Borio L. Testimony, House Energy and Commerce Subcommitttee on Oversight and Investigations Hearing, “Examining the U.S. Public Health Response to the Zika Virus”. Washington, D.C: Congressional Documents and Publications; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Food US, Administration D. Finding of No Significant Impact. 2016 [ cited 2019 Apr 22]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/UCM514699.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meghani Z, Kuzma J. Regulating animals with gene drive systems: lessons from the regulatory assessment of a genetically engineered mosquito. J Responsible Innovation. 2018;5(sup1):S203–S222.
   Google Scholar
• Forfa T, Petition Denial 2016 Aug 5, ID # FDA-2015-P-1433-0081. 2016, Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2015-P–1433–0081.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Clarification of FDA and EPA Jurisdiction Over Mosquito-Related Products: guidance for Industry #236. Federal Register, 2017. 82(12).
   Google Scholar
• Comments on Pesticide Experimental Use Permits: applications: oxitec Ltd. ID # EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0756-0001. 2018, Regulations.gov: [cited 2020 Dec 5]. https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-HQ-OPP–2019–0274.
   Google Scholar
• Klingener N GMO Mosquito Application Withdrawn - But Another Is On The Way. WLRN National Public Radio 2018 [ cited 2018 Nov 30]; Available from: http://www.wlrn.org/post/gmo-mosquito-application-withdrawn-another-way.
   Google Scholar
• Evans BR, Stoler, J, Brouwer, KC, et al. Transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes transfer genes into a natural population. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Servick K. GM mosquito study draws fire. Science. 2019;365(6459):1234.
   Google Scholar
• Comments on Pesticide Experimental Use Permits: applications: oxitec Ltd. ID # EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0274. 2019, Regulations.gov: [cited 2020 Dec 7]. https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-HQ-OPP–2019–0274.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Notice of Experimental Use Permit, ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0274-0360. 2020, Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0274–0001.
   Google Scholar
• LaMotte S, 750 million genetically engineered mosquitoes approved for release in Florida Keys. 2020, [cited 2020 Aug 20]. https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/19/health/gmo-mosquitoes-approved-florida-scn-wellness/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Trump DJ, Executive Order 13874 of June 11, 2019,“Modernizing the Regulatory Framework for Agricultural Biotechnology Products,”. 2019, [cited 2020 Dec 20]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-regulatory-framework-agricultural-biotechnology-products/.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin JS, Deliberative polling. Consulting the people is not as easy as it sounds, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson Center. How We Work: citizen Juries. 2020 [ cited 2020 Apr 17]; Available from: https://jefferson-center.org/about-us/how-we-work/.
   Google Scholar