Using a modified Delphi method to identify research priorities in an Australian regional health service

References

• Jonker L, Fisher S. The correlation between National Health Service trusts’ clinical trial activity and both mortality rates and care quality commission ratings: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Public Health. 2018;157:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen G, Schroeder J, Newson R, et al. Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(1):3. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-13-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleurence RL, Torgerson DJ. Setting priorities for research. Health Policy. 2004;69(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.. Australia's health 2020: in brief. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). Rural and remote health. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-and-remote-health.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. National Strategic Framework for Rural and Remote Health. Canberra; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• McGrail MR, Jones R, Robinson A, et al. The planning of rural health research: rurality and rural population issues. Rural Remote Health. 2005;5(4):1–8.426.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson A, Burley M, McGrail MR, et al. The conducting and reporting of rural health research: rurality and rural population issues. Rural Remote Health. 2005;5(4):1–7.427.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod ML. Building bridges with decision-makers: rules for rural and remote health researchers. Rural Remote Health. 2006;6(3):1–7.567.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical Trials Jurisdictional Working Group. Clinical Trials Jurisdictional Working Group Framework for National Aggregate Statistics (NAS) 2015-2016. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman A, Brown A, Pain T, et al. Evaluating research investment and impact at a regional Australian Hospital and Health Service: a programme theory and conceptual framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter J, Charlton K, Tapsell L, et al. Using the Delphi process to identify priorities for Dietetic research in Australia 2020-2030. Nutr Diet. 2020;77(4):437–443. doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi SH, Blick C, Handforth C, et al. Essential research priorities in renal cancer: A modified delphi consensus statement. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(5):991–998. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Donnell SM, Carison A, Adams J, et al. Delphi assessment of audit and research priorities in an emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;32(4):556–561. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.13453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom M, Wainwright L, Spence K, et al. Global neonatal nurses identify research priorities for improving neonatal outcome. J Neonatal Nurs. 2021;27(2):147–152. doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2020.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Smith GE, Long J, Wallace T, et al. Identifying the research priorities of healthcare professionals in UK vascular surgery: modified Delphi approach. BJS OPEN. 2021;5(2):1-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith N, Mitton C, Peacock S, et al. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):165–173. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littlewood R, Canfell OJ, Tracey F. Building a children’s health service and system research strategy: development and integration in an Australian paediatric healthcare setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–11589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna HP. Research guidelines for the delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford BA, Chia-Chien H. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation. 2007;12:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Niederberger M, Spranger J. Delphi technique in health sciences: A Map. Front Public Health. 2020;8:1–10. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of Queensland. Darling Downs Health annual report 2019-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manag. 2004;42(1):15–29. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers R, Gaakeer MI, Patka P, et al. Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):1–15. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01029-4156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of Queensland. Darling downs health strategic plan 2020–2024; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah A, Banerjee J, Lecky F, et al. Emergency medical dispatch services across Pan-Asian countries: a web-based survey. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12873-019-0299-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MSJ, Vaughan-Shaw P, Boyle C, et al. A modified AUGIS delphi process to establish future research priorities in benign upper gastrointestinal surgery. World J Surg. 2020;44(4):1216–1222. doi:10.1007/s00268-019-05308-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva Acosta A, Barbosa SFF, Dal Sasso GTM. Nursing research priorities in critical care in Brazil: Delphi Study. Rev Lat-Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand M, Zvrskovec J, Hubel C, et al. Identifying research priorities for the study of atypical anorexia nervosa: A Delphi study. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(10):1729–1738. doi:10.1002/eat.23358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar