Determining the temporal factors of survival associated with brain and nervous system cancer patients: A hybrid machine learning methodology

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). An Update on Cancer Deaths in the United States. Retrieved 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/research/update-on-cancer-deaths/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. (2021). Cancer Facts and Figures 2021. Retrieved 2022, from https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2021.html.
   Google Scholar
• Farmanfarma K, Mohammadian M, Shahabinia Z, et al. Brain cancer in the world: an epidemiological review. World Cancer Res J. 2019: 1–5. doi:10.32113/wcrj_20197_1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2020). Cancer Today. Retrieved 2022, from https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/31-Brain-central-nervous-system-fact-sheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute. (2021). Cancer Stat Facts: Brain and Other Nervous System Cancer. Retrieved 2022, from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html.
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Zong H. Developmental origins of brain tumors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012;22(5):844–849. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.04.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian institute of health and welfare. Brain and other central nervous system cancers. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• GBD 2016 Brain and Other CNS Cancer Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other CNS cancer, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurology. 2019;18(4):376–393. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30468-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom Q, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, et al. Cbtrus statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016. Neuro Oncology. 2019;21:v1–v100. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, et al. Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:381–406. doi:10.3322/caac.21693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher EA, McKee AC. Atlas of diagnostic oncology (Vol. 3). (A. T. Skarin, & G. P. Canellos, Eds.). London: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wrensch M, Minn Y, Chew T, et al. Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: current concepts and review of theliterature. Neuro Oncol. 2002;4(4):278–299. doi:10.1093/neuonc/4.4.278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Misra S, Narayanan R, et al. Lung cancer survival prediction using ensemble data mining on SEER data. Sci Program. 2012;20:29–42. doi:10.1155/2012/920245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Chen S-H. Developing a novel machine learning-based classification scheme for predicting SPCs in breast cancer survivors. Front Genet. 2019;10; doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotoudeh H, Shafaat O, Bernstock JD, et al. Artificial intelligence in the management of glioma: era of personalized medicine. Front Oncol. 2019;9; doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aikemu B, Xue P, Hong H, et al. Artificial intelligence in decision-making for colorectal cancer treatment strategy: an observational study of implementing watson for oncology in a 250-case cohort. Front Oncol. 2021;10; doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.594182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong D, Yip S. Machine learning classifies cancer. Nature. 2018;555:446–447. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-02881-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Shishir FS, Ashraf M, et al. Brain tumor detection using convolutional neural network. 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT); 2019 (pp. 1-6); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay N, Waldman AD. Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:S107–S111. doi:10.1259/bjr/65711810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahab D, Ghoniemy S, Selim G. Automated brain tumor detection and identification using image processing and probabilistic neural network techniques. Int J Image Process Visual Commun. 2012;1(2):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Abdar M, Fahami MA, Rundo L, et al. Hercules: deep hierarchical attentive multilevel fusion model with uncertainty quantification for medical image classification. IEEE Trans Ind Inf. 2023;19(1):274–285. doi:10.1109/TII.2022.3168887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaberipour M, Soliman H, Sahgal A, et al. A priori prediction of local failure in brain metastasis after hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using quantitative MRI and machine learning. Sci Rep. 2021;11; doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01024-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Chakraborty M. Brain tumor detection from pre-processed MR images using segmentation techniques. Special Issue on 2nd National Conference- Computing, Communication and Sensor Network (CCSN); 2011; IJCA.
   Google Scholar
• Delen D. Analysis of cancer data: a data mining approach. Expert Syst. 2009;26(1):100–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0394.2008.00480.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Han TH, Park RW. A hybrid Bayesian network model for predicting breast cancer prognosis. J Korean Soc Med Inf. 2009;15(1):49–57. doi:10.4258/jksmi.2009.15.1.49.
   Google Scholar
• Thongprayoon C, Mao MA, Keddis MT, et al. Hypernatremia subgroups among hospitalized patients by machine learning consensus clustering with different patient survival. J Nephrol. 2022;35:921–929. doi:10.1007/s40620-021-01163-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Li C, Zheng L, et al. A machine learning-based survival prediction model of high grade glioma by integration of clinical and dose-volume histogram parameters. Cancer Med. 2021;10(8):2774–2786. doi:10.1002/cam4.3838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Laencina PJ, Abreu PH, Abreu MH, et al. Missing data imputation on the 5-year survival prediction of breast cancer patients with unknown discrete values. Comput Biol Med 2015;59:125–133. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin M, Lundin J, Burke H, et al. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer. Oncology. 1999;57:281–286. doi:10.1159/000012061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boughorbel S, Al-Ali R, Elkum N. Model comparison for breast cancer prognosis based on clinical data. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146413), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek S, Kursuncu U, Kibis E, et al. A hybrid data mining approach for identifying the temporal effects of variables associated with breast cancer survival. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;139:112863, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Yang Z-Y, Chen T-Y, et al. Ethnicity and survival in bladder cancer: a population-based study based on the SEER database. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02308-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Ma H, Hong G, et al. Survival improvement in patients with pancreatic cancer by decade: a period analysis of the SEER database, 1981–2010. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):1–10. doi:10.1038/srep06747.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Sun X, Bai W. Clinical applications and future directions of minimal residual disease testing in multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1–12. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg J, Chia L, Plevritis S. The effect of age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, and disease stage on invasive ductal breast cancer survival in the U.S. SEER database. SEER Database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89:47–54. doi:10.1007/s10549-004-1470-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn A, Braley A, Vega P, et al. The association between race and survival in glioblastoma patients in the US: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198581–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senders JT, Staples P, Mehrtash A, et al. An online calculator for the prediction of survival in glioblastoma patients using classical statistics and machine learning. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(2):E184–E192. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. (1975-2018). National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2022, from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program: https://seer.cancer.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Doraisami S, Golzari S, Norowi N, et al. A study on feature selection and classification techniques for automatic genre classification of traditional malay music. In: ISMIR. Philadelphia, PA; 2008. p. 331–336.
   Google Scholar
• Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med. 2005;34(2):113–127. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding H, Guo SH, Deng EZ, et al. Prediction of golgi-resident protein types by using feature selection technique. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2013;124:9–13. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Ding H. Predicting ion channels and their types by the dipeptide mode of pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol 2011;269:64–69. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasiri H, Alavi S. A novel framework based on deep learning and ANOVA feature selection method for diagnosis of COVID-19 cases from chest X-Ray images. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022;2022:1, doi:10.1155/2022/4694567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genuer R, Poggi M, Tuleau-Malot C. Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2010;31(14):2225–2236. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan X, Shen H. Robust prediction of B-factor profile from sequence using two-stage SVR based on random forest feature selection. Protein Pept Lett 2009;16(12):1447–1454. doi:10.2174/092986609789839250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Runger G. Gene selection with guided regularized random forest. Pattern Recognit. 2013;46(12):3483–3489. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2013.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Lu W, Liu L, et al. Classification of SRC kinase inhibitors based on support vector machine. QSAR and Combinatorial Science. 2009;28(6):719–727. doi:10.1002/qsar.200860105.
   Google Scholar
• Yang F, Hamit M, Yan CB, et al. Feature extraction and classification on esophageal X-ray images of Xinjiang Kazak nationality. Data Min Biomed Healthcare. 2017;2017:1, doi:10.1155/2017/4620732.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2002;38(4):367–378. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapire RE, Singer Y. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Mach Learn. 1999;37(3):297–336. doi:10.1023/A:1007614523901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH, Meulman JJ. Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology. Stat Med. 2003;22(9):1365–1381. doi:10.1002/sim.1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzamzami F, Hoda M, Saddik AE. Light gradient boosting machine for general sentiment classification on short texts: a comparative evaluation. IEEE Access. 2020;8:101840–101858. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Y. Application of stochastic gradient boosting approach to early prediction of safety accidents at construction site. Adv Civil Eng. 2019: 9, doi:10.1155/2019/1574297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun R, Wang G, Zhang W, et al. A gradient boosting decision tree based GPS signal reception classification algorithm. Appl Soft Comput. 2020;86; doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona P, Climent F, Momparler A. Predicting failure in the U.S. banking sector: an extreme gradient boosting approach. Int Rev Econ Fin. 2019;61:304–323. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2018.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. London: Pearson Education, Inc; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Artificial Neural Networks. In: PJ Braspenning, F Thuijsman, AJMM Weijters, editor. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Nath G, Wang Y, Coursey A, et al. Incorporating a machine learning model into a Web-based administrative decision support tool for predicting workplace absenteeism. Information. 2022;13(7):320. MDPI AG, doi:10.3390/info13070320.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff P, Graña M, Ríos S, et al. Machine learning readmission risk modeling: a pediatric case study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;9; doi:10.1155/2019/8532892.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad I, Yousaf M, Yousaf S, et al. Fake news detection using machine learning ensemble methods. Complexity. 2020;2020:1, doi:10.1155/2020/8885861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett T. ROC graphs: notes and practical considerations for researchers. Mach Learn. 2004;31:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Su H, Dou Y. Beyond AP: a new evaluation index for multiclass classification task accuracy. Appl Intell. 2021;51:7166–7176. doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02223-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla N, Bower K, Hall L, et al. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002: 321–357. doi:10.1613/jair.953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May RJ, Maier HR, Dandy GC. Data splitting for artificial neural networks using SOM-based stratified sampling. Neural Netw. 2010;23(2):283–294. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Kamber M. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Waltham (MA): Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Shin H. Breast cancer survivability prediction using labeled, unlabeled, and pseudo-labeled patient data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:613–618. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barami K, Lyon L, Conell C. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and glioblastoma multiforme-assessing risk and survival: results of a large retrospective study and systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:300–307. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samara KA, Al Aghbari Z, Abusafia A. GLIMPSE: a glioblastoma prognostication model using ensemble learning—a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021;9(1). doi:10.1007/s13755-020-00134-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dag AZ, Akcam Z, Kibis E, et al. A probabilistic data analytics methodology based on Bayesian Belief network for predicting and understanding breast cancer survival. Knowl Based Syst. 2022;242:108407, doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scosyrev E, Messing J, Noyes K, et al. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and population-based research in urologic oncology: an overview. Urol Oncol: Semin Orig Invest. 2012;30(2):126–132. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar