Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships

References

• Alanen, L. 2014. Childhood and intergenerationality. Toward an intergenerational perspective on child well-being. In: A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes and J. E. Korbin, eds. Handbook of child well-being. Dordrecht: Springer, Vol. 1, pp. 131–160.
   Google Scholar
• Carel H. 2011. Phenomenology and its application in medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 32, pp. 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s11017-010-9161-x
   Google Scholar
• Castro, R. J. 2016. Mitochondrial replacement therapy: The UK and US regulatory landscapes. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(3), pp. 726–735. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsw051
   Google Scholar
• Cavaliere, G. 2017. Genome editing and assisted reproduction: Curing embryos, society or prospective parents? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9793-y
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. S. 2015 . Statement on NIH funding of research using gene-editing technologies in human embryos. National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://www.nih.gov/about/director/04292015_statement_gene_editing_technologies.htm.
   Google Scholar
• De Beauvoir, S. 2015. The ethics of ambiguity. B. Frechtman, transl. New York: Open Road (orig. 1948).
   Google Scholar
• Durand, G. 2017. De la non-malfaisance procréative. Bioethica Forum, 10(1), pp. 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, M., Grüber, K. and Rehmann-Sutter, C., eds. 2014. The human enhancement debate and disability. New bodies for a better life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1993. Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, R. 1995. Pregnancy in a high-tech age. Paradoxes of choice. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, P. and Stotz, K. 2013. Genetics and philosophy. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidar, G., Dupras, C. and Ravitsky, V. 2016. Non-invasive prenatal testing: Review of ethical, legal and social implications. BioéthiqueOnline, 5(6), pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, A. 1965. This living stream. London: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing evolution. The ethical case for making better people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2015. Germline manipulation and our future worlds. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(12), pp. 30–34. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1104163
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, M., Wolstenholme, J., Murdoch, A. P. and Butler, T. J. 1995. Mitotic activity during preimplantation development of human embryos. Reproduction, 103, pp. 209–214. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1030209
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. 1999. Love's labor. Essays on women, equality and dependency. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lantos, J. D., Wendler, D., Septimus, E., Wahba, S., Madigan, R. and Bliss, G. 2015. Considerations in the evaluation and determination of minimal risk in pragmatic clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 12(5), pp. 485–493. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597687
   Google Scholar
• Magnúsdóttir, E. and Surani, M.A. 2014. How to make a primordial germ cell. Development, 141, pp. 245–252. doi: 10.1242/dev.098269
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. 2000. Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Human genome editing: Science, ethics, and governance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK447270/.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann-Held, E. M. and Rehmann-Sutter, C. eds. 2006. Genes in development. Re-reading of the molecular paradigm. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2016. Genome editing: An ethical review. London: Nuffield Council. Available from: http://nuffieldbioethics.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, K. E., Mortlock, D. P., Scholes, D. T., Bombard, Y., Brody, L. C., Faucett, W. A., Garrison, N. A., Hercher, L., Isasi, R., Middleton, A., Musunuru, K., Shriner, D., Virani, A. and Young, C. E. 2017. Human germline genome editing (ASHG Position Statement). The American Journal of Human Genetics, 101, pp. 167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.012
   Google Scholar
• Oyama, S. 2000. The ontogeny of information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985 (new ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. 2017. Solidarity in biomedicine and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. 1999. Testing women, testing the fetus. The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmann-Sutter, C. 1991. Gentherapie in der menschlichen Keimbahn?. Ethik in der Medizin, 3, pp. 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmann-Sutter, C. 2003. Keimbahnveränderungen in Nebenfolge? Ethische Überlegungen zur Abgrenzbarkeit der somatischen Gentherapie. In: C. Rehmann-Sutter and H. Müller, eds. Ethik und Gentherapie. Tübingen: Francke, 2nd ed., pp. 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmann-Sutter, C. 2017. PID auf Aneuploidie des Embryos? Ethische Überlegungen zur Auslegung von § 3a des Embryonenschutzgesetzes in Deutschland. Ethik in der Medizin, 29(3), pp. 201–216. doi: 10.1007/s00481-017-0445-9
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. 1986. The tentative pregnancy. Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, M. E. and Friedman, J. M. 2015. Genetic mosaics and the germ line lineage. Genes, 6, pp. 216–237. doi: 10.3390/genes6020216
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J. and Kahane, G. 2009. The moral obligation to create children with the best chance to the best life. Bioethics, 23(5), 274–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00687.x
   Google Scholar
• Schües, C. 2016. Philosophie des Geborenseins (New edition). Munich: Alber.
   Google Scholar
• Schües, C. 2017. The transhuman paradigm and the meaning of life. In: H. A. Fielding and D. E. Olkowski, eds. Feminist phenomenology futures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 218–241.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. 1979. Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Vol. 1. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, J. L. and Rehmann-Sutter, C. 2001. When norms normalize. The case of genetic enhancement. Human Gene Therapy, 12, pp. 87–96. doi: 10.1089/104303401451004
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, J. M., Barrand, S. and Western, P. 2013. Fine-tuning evolution: Germ-line epigenetics and inheritance. Reproduction, 146(1), R37–48. doi: 10.1530/REP-12-0526
   Google Scholar
• Weismann, A. 1892. Das Keimplasma. Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Jena.
   Google Scholar