Ethical Issues in Intrauterine Myelomeningocele Surgery

References

• Adzick, N.S., et al.; MOMS Investigators, 2011. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. The New England journal of medicine, 364, 993–1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014379
   Google Scholar
• Adzick, N.S., 2013. Fetal surgery for spina bifida: past, present, future. Seminars in pediatric surgery, 22, 10–17. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Ancel, P.Y., Goffinet, F., and the EPIPAGE-2 Writing Group, 2015. Survival and Morbidity of Preterm Children Born at 22 Through 34 Weeks’ Gestation in France in 2011 Results of the EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study. JAMA pediatrics 169, 230–238. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3351
   Google Scholar
• Araujo Júnior, E., et al., 2016. Procedure-related complications of open vs endoscopic fetal surgery for treatment of spina bifida in an era of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 48, 151–160. doi: 10.1002/uog.15830
   Google Scholar
• Bellieni, C.V., and Buonocore, G., 2009. Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn. Acta paediatrica, 98, 613–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01185.x
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, N.S., and Pedreira, D.A., 2015. Fetoscopy for meningomyelocele repair: past, present and future. Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil), 13, 283–289. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3032
   Google Scholar
• Bixenmann, B.J., et al., 2014. Prenatal and postnatal evaluation for syringomyelia in patients with spinal dysraphism. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 14, 316–321. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.PEDS13482
   Google Scholar
• Brock, J.W., et al.; MOMS Investigators, 2015. Bladder function after fetal surgery for Myelomeningocele. Pediatrics, 136, e906–e913. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2114
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., 2015. Urological results after fetal myelomeningocele repair in pre-Moms trial patients at the Children’s Hospital Of Philadelphia. Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 37, 211–218. doi: 10.1159/000362932
   Google Scholar
• Cavalheiros, S., et al., 2011. Fetal hydrochepalus. Child’s nervous system, 27, 1575–1583. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1539-1
   Google Scholar
• D’Addelfio, G., 2005. Considerazioni etiche sul tema qualità della vita: l’approccio delle Capacità di Martha Nussbaum. Medicina e Morale, 4, 741–767.
   Google Scholar
• Danzer, E., et al., 2011. Fetal myelomeningocele surgery: preschool functional status using the Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM). Child’s nervous system, 27, 1083–1088. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1388-y
   Google Scholar
• Danzer, E., and Johnson, M.P., 2014. Fetal surgery for neural tube defects. Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 19, 2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Danzer, E., Johnson, M.P., and Adzick, N.S., 2012. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: progress and perspectives. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 54, 8–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04049.x
   Google Scholar
• Diemert, A., et al., 2012. Intrauterine surgery- choices and limitations. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 109, 603–608.
   Google Scholar
• Di Pietro, M.L., and Faggioni, M.P., 2014. Bioetica e infanzia. Della teoria alla prassi. Bologna: Centro editoriale dehoniano.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, L.W., and Anderson, P.J., 2010. Adult outcome of extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics, 126, 342–351. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0710
   Google Scholar
• Fanaroff, J.M., et al.; International Perinatal Collegium (IPC), 2014. The ethics and practice of neonatal resuscitation at the limits of viability: an international perspective. Acta paediatrica, 103, 701–708.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, T.C., et al., 2013. Improvement of motor function and decreased need for postnatal hunting in children who had undergone intrauterine myelomeningocele repair. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 71, 604–608. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130104
   Google Scholar
• Ferschl, M., 2013. Anesthesia for in utero repair of myelomeningocele. Anesthesiology, 118, 1211–1223. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828ea597
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Godínez, B., et al., 2011. Latencies using somatosensory evoked potentials of the median and tibial nerve in rhesus monkey undergoing intrauterine laminectomy to simulate myelomeningocele. Cirugía y cirujanos, 79, 237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Hisaba, W.J., et al., 2012. Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair postnatal results and follow-up at 3.5 years of age- initial experience from a single reference service in Brazil. Child’s nervous system, 28, 461–467. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1662-z
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, L., et al., 2014. Fetal surgery: the ochsner experience with in utero spina bifida repair. The Ochsner journal, 14, 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Laskay, N.M.B., et al., 2017. A comparison of the MOMS trial results to a contemporaneous, single-institution, postnatal closure cohort. Child’s nervous system, 33, 639–646. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3328-3
   Google Scholar
• Marenco, M.L., et al., 2013. Corrección intrauterina de mielomenigocele: experiencia del programa de medicina y terapia fetal del Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocío. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación, 60, 47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.011
   Google Scholar
• Maselli, K.M., and Badillo, A., 2016. Advances in fetal surgery. Annals of translational medicine, 4, 394. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.10.34
   Google Scholar
• Meuli, M., and Moehrlen, U., 2014. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele is effective: a critical look at the whys. Pediatric surgery international, 30, 689–697. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3524-8
   Google Scholar
• Moise, J.K., 2014. The History of Fetal Therapy. American journal of perinatology, 31, 557–566. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1364191
   Google Scholar
• Moldenhauer, J.S., 2014. In utero repair of spina bifida. American journal of perinatology, 31, 595–604. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372429
   Google Scholar
• Moldenhauer, J.S., et al., 2015. Fetal myelomeningocele repair: the post-MOMS experience at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 37, 235–240. doi: 10.1159/000365353
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2006. Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: ethical issues. Plymouth: Latimer Trend & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Peiro, J.L., et al., 2013. Single-Access Fetal Endoscopy (SAFE) for myelomeningocele in sheep model I: amniotic carbon dioxide gas approach. Surgical endoscopy, 27, 3835–3840. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2984-6
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, E.D., 1993. Ethics. Journal of the American medical association, 270, 202–203. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510020066020
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, E.D., and Thomasma, D.C., 1993. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saadai, P., and Farmer, D.L., 2012. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Clinics in perinatology, 39, 279–288. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Sala, P., et al., 2014. Fetal surgery: an overview. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 69, 218–228. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000061
   Google Scholar
• Santana, E.F., et al., 2016. Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring during Intrauterine Open Surgery for Myelomeningocele Repair. Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 39, 172–178. doi: 10.1159/000438508
   Google Scholar
• Sgouros, S., 2013. Spinal dysraphism. Child’s nervous system, 29, 1415–1416. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2181-x
   Google Scholar
• Tulipan, N., et al.; MOMS Investigators, 2015. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 16, 613–620. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.PEDS15336
   Google Scholar
• van Lith, J.M.M., Johnson, M.P., and Wilson, R.D., 2013. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: fetal surgery after Moms: is fetal therapy better than neonatal? Prenatal diagnosis, 33, 13–16. doi: 10.1002/pd.4037
   Google Scholar
• Wataganara, T., et al., 2017. Establishing prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele in Asia: the Singapore consensus. Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 41, 161–178. doi: 10.1159/000452218
   Google Scholar
• Werner, E.F., et al., 2012. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele: a decision analysis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 40, 158–164. doi: 10.1002/uog.11176
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H., 2011. Questioning the rationale and conduct of the management of myelomeningocele study. Medical hypotheses, 77, 101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.03.037
   Google Scholar
• Zamłyński, J., et al., 2014. Comparison of prenatal and postnatal treatments of spina bifida in Poland--a non-randomized, single-center study. Journal of maternal-fetal and neonatal medicine, 27, 1409–1417. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.858689
   Google Scholar
• Zamłyński, J., et al. 2017. Current views on fetal surgical treatment of myelomeningocele -the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial and Polish clinical experience. Ginekologia polska, 88, 31–35. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0006
   Google Scholar