Genome Modifying Reproductive Procedures and their Effects on Numerical Identity

References

• Appleby, J.B., 2015. The ethical challenges of the clinical introduction of mitochondrial replacement techniques. Medicine, health care and philosophy, 18 (4), 501–14. doi:10.1007/s11019-015-9656-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonin, D., 2014. The non-identity problem and the ethics of future people. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bredenoord, A.L., et al., 2011. Ethics of modifying the mitochondrial genome. Journal of medical ethics, 37 (2), 97–100. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.037481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, L., et al., 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 339 (6121), 819–23. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grazia, D., 2012. Creation ethics: reproduction, genetics, and quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, G., 1980. Origin and identity. Philosophical studies, 37 (4), 353–362. doi: 10.1007/BF00354904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foresight Future Identities, 2013. Final project report. London: The Government Office for Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, A., 2017. The metaphysics of identity. London – New York: Routledge, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Heshenov, D.B., 2003. Can there be spatially coincident entities of the same kind? Canadian journal of philosophy, 33 (1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/00455091.2003.10716533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1655. De Corpore (Concerning the Body), Chapter 11:7.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 2018. Genomics and genome editing in the NHS. Third Report of Session 2017–19, HC 349, Published on 20 April 2018 by authority of the House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2013. Mitochondria replacement consultation: Advice to Government. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, paragraph 6.57. Available from: http://hfeaarchive.uksouth.cloudapp.azure.com/www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Mitochondria_replacement_consultation_-_advice_for_Government.pdf [Accessed 27 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Jinek, M., et al., 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337 (6096), 816–21. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, X., et al., 2016. Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 33 (5), 581–588. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, S., 1972, 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewens, T., 2015. The biological foundations of bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., 1976. Survival and identity. In: A. Rorty, ed. The identities of persons, 17–40. (Reprinted in his Philosophical Papers vol. I. New York: Oxford University Press. 1983). California: Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, P., et al., 2015. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein cell, 6 (5), 363–372. doi: 10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S.M., 2006. The hegeler institute. The organism view defended. Monist, 89 (3), 334–50. doi: 10.5840/monist200689315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S.M., 2010. Twinning, inorganic replacement, and the organism view. Ratio, 23 (1), 59–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S.M., 2017. Do mitochondrial replacement techniques affect qualitative or numerical identity? Bioethics, 31 (1), 20–26. doi:10.1111/bioe.12308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J., 1690. An essay concerning human understanding. Chapter XXVII, Section 1.
   Google Scholar
• MacKellar, C., 2014. Should persons affected by mitochondrial disorders not be brought into existence? BioNews No. 736.
   Google Scholar
• MacKellar, C., 2015. Gene editing of human embryos – more ethical questions to answer. BioNews No. 801.
   Google Scholar
• MacKellar, C., 2017. Why germline genome editing may be discriminatory. BioNews No. 926.
   Google Scholar
• MacKellar, C., 2018. The Nuffield report on genome editing and the equality of persons. BioNews No. 960.
   Google Scholar
• MacKellar, C. and Bechtel, C., 2014. The ethics of the new eugenics. New York – London: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, P., 2006. How things might have been: individuals, kinds, and essential properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016. Mitochondrial replacement techniques: ethical, social, and policy considerations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). Chapter 3.
   Google Scholar
• Noli, L., et al., 2017. Potential of human twin embryos generated by embryo splitting in assisted reproduction and research. Human reproduction update, 23 (2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2012. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2018. Genome editing and human reproduction: social and ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, E.T., 2003. An argument for animalism. In: R. Martin and J. Barresi, eds. Personal identity. Blackwell readings in philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 318–334.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios-González, C., 2017. Are there moral differences between maternal spindle transfer and pronuclear transfer? Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 20 (4), 503–511. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9772-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfit, D., 1971. Personal identity. The philosophical review, 80 (1), 3–27. doi: 10.2307/2184309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfit, D., 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D., 2006. Rights, interests, and possible people. In: H. Kuhse and P. Singer, eds. Bioethics: an anthology, 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 108–112.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M.A. and Wasserman, D.T. eds., 2009. Harming future persons: ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rulli, T., 2017. The mitochondrial replacement ‘therapy’ myth. Bioethics, 31 (5), 368–374. doi:10.1111/bioe.12332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechtman, M., 1996. The constitution of selves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schermer, M., 2011. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience. 5, 17. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shoemaker, S., 1963. Self-knowledge and self-identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon, P.F., 1991. Personal identity and brain transplants. In: D. Cockburn, ed. Human beings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon, P.F., 2014. Persons, animals, ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbock, B., 2009. Wrongful life and procreative decisions. In: M.A. Roberts and D.T. Wasserman, eds. Harming future persons: ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. New York: Springer, 155–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, L., et al., 2017. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human zygotes using Cas9 protein. Molecular genetics and genomics, 292 (3), 525–533. doi: 10.1007/s00438-017-1299-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, D., 1967. Identity and spatio-temporal continuity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, A., Wilkinson, S., and Appleby, J.B., 2015. Mitochondrial replacement: ethics and identity. Bioethics, 29 (9), 631–8. doi:10.1111/bioe.12187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar