Love as a Journey in the Informed Consent Context: Legal Abortion in England and Wales as a Case Study

References

• Aiken, A., et al., 2021a. Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study. BJOG, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16668.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, A.R., et al., 2021b. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis. BMJ sexual reproductive health, 47, 238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amery, F., 2020. Beyond pro-life and pro-choice. Bristol: The Policy press. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Arvind, T.T. and McMahon, A.M., 2020. Responsiveness and the role of rights in medical law: lessons from montgomery. Medical law review, 28 (3), 445–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benson, R., Gold, E., and Nash, E., 2007. State abortion counselling policies and the fundamental principles of informed consent. Guttmacher policy review, 10 (4). Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2007/11/state-abortion-counselingpolicies-and-fundamental-principles-informed-consent (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. 2018. Women in England should be allowed to have abortions at home. BBC, 29th May 2018. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-44241069 (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cave, E., 2020. Selecting treatment options and choosing between them: delineating patient and professional autonomy in shared decision making. Health care analysis, 28, (1) 4-24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cave, E. and Milo, C., 2020. Informing patients: The Bolam legacy. Medical law international, 20 (2), 103.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, S., et al., 2020. Characteristics of patients having telemedicine versus informed consent visits before abortion in Utah. Contraception, 101, 56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Health and Social Care. June 2018. Abortion statistics, England and Wales, p. 9. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/763174/2017-abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-revised.pdf (Accessed 2nd January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Deveaney, S., Miola, J., and Cave, E., 2020. Healthcare professional standards in pandemic conditions: the duty to obtain consent. JBI, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10048-1.
   Google Scholar
• GMC. 2008. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Consent_-_English_0617.pdf (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• GMC October 2018. Decision-making and consent: supporting patient choices about health and care. Draft guidance for consultation. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/gmc-site-images/ethical-guidance/related-pdf-items/consent-draft-guidance/consent-draft-guidance.pdf?la=en&hash=E85F0DD8C7033541BF51F1C619EF992B1A45A188 (Accessed 1st January 2022) 8-9.
   Google Scholar
• GMC 2020. Decision making and consent. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-guidance-for-doctors—decision-making-and-consent-english_pdf-84191055.pdf?la=en&hash=BE327A1C584627D12BC51F66E790443F0E0651DA (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Greasley, K., 2011. Medical abortion and the ‘golden rule’ of statutory interpretation. Medical Law review, 19 (2), 314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greasley, K., 2017. Arguments about abortion: personhood, morality and the law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 203-221.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 1st July 2020. Counselling and waiting periods for abortion. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/counseling-and-waiting-periods-abortion (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J., 2013. Caring and the Law. Oxford: Hart. pp. 46-85.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J., 2019. Law and the relational self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 99-140.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J., Fullford, K.M.W., et al., 2017. Elbow room for best practice? montgomery, patient’s values, and balanced decision-making in person-centred clinical care. Medical law review, 25 (4), 582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Roche, K.J. and Foster, A.M., 2020. It gives you autonomy over your own choices: A qualitative study of Canadian abortion patients’ experiences with mifepristone and misoprostol. Contraception, 102 (1), 61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, E., 2003. Tensions in the regulation of abortion in britain. Journal of law and society, 30 (4), 532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., 2004. Young women, pregnancy and abortion in Britain: a discussion of law in practice. International journal of law, policy and the family, 18, 283–290.
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre, S.J., 1973. The medical profession and the 1967 Abortion Act in Britain. Social science & medicine, 7, 132.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J.K., 2009. Voluntary and involuntary termination of pregnancy. In: J. K. Mason, ed. The trouble pregnancy, legal wrongs and rights in reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 29-30.
   Google Scholar
• National Right to life committee. June 2018. A woman’s right to know: Casey-style informed consent laws. Available from: https://www.nrlc.org/uploads/stateleg/WRTKFactSheet.pdf (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Nice. 2019. Abortion care. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng140/resources/abortion-carepdf- 66141773098693 (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Parson, J. and Romanis, E.C., 2021. Early medical abortion, equality of access, and the telemedical imperative. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2019. Better for women. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/news/campaigns-and-opinions/better-for-women/better-for-women-full-report.pdf (Accessed 1st January 2022), pp. 144–148.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 19th June 2020. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection and pregnancy. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-06-18-coronavirus-COVID-19-infection-in-pregnancy.pdf (Accessed 1st January 2022) p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 31st July 2020. Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and abortion care. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-07-31-coronavirus-COVID-19-infection-and-abortion-care.pdf (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2021a. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Information for women requiring abortion. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/coronavirus-abortion/information-for-women/ (Accessed 1st January 2022) Question 4.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2021b. Decision aid for early medical abortion without ultrasound. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-06-04-decision-aid-for-early-medical-abortion-without-ultrasound.pdf (Accessed 1st January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Romanis, E.C., Parsons, J., and Hodson, N., 2020. COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic. Journal of law and the biosciences, 7 (1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S., 2016a. British abortion Law: speaking from the past to govern the future. Medical law review, 79 (2), 283.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S., 2016b. The de-criminalisation of abortion: An argument for modernisation. Oxford journal of legal studies, 36, 334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S. and Wellings, K., 2020. Decriminalising abortion in UK. Bristol: Policy Press. pp. 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtyla, K., 1981. Love and responsibility. Rev. ed. London: Collins: Fount. p. 139
   Google Scholar