Opt-in Vs. Opt-out of Organ Donation in Scotland: Bioethical analysis

References

• Ahmad, M.U., et al., 2019. A systematic review of opt-out versus opt-in consent on deceased organ donation and transplantation (2006–2016). World journal of surgery, 43 (12), 3161–3171. doi:10.1007/s00268-019-05118-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M., and Tenbrusel, A., 2011. Blind spots: why we fail to do what's right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T.L., and Childress, J.F., 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. XX: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. 2000. Organ donation in the 21st century: Time for a consolidated approach. Available from: http://www.clodlog.com/resources/Documents/BMA-Report-2000.pdf [Accessed 23 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C.R., and Koch, P., 2017. Flawed assumptions: ethical problems with proposed presumed consent legislation. American journal of transplantationtd, 17 (12), 3262–3263. doi:10.1111/ajt.14402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIOMS. 2016. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans. Geneva. Available from: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1999. “Oviedo Convention and Its Protocols.” Bioethics. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/bioethics/oviedo-convention [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Dalal, A.R., 2015. Philosophy of organ donation: review of ethical facets. World journal of transplantation, 5 (2), 44. doi:10.5500/wjt.v5.i2.44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dar, R., 2016. Linkages of organ/tissue donation and transplantation with “Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs”-Indian stories. The international journal of Indian psychology, 3 (2), 14–27. doi:10.25215/0302.018.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R., 2016. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinç, L., and Gastmans, C., 2013. Trust in nurse-patient relationships: a literature review. Nursing ethics, 20 (5), 501–516. doi:10.1177/0969733012468463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, O., 2019. US hospital is accused of keeping vegetative patient alive to boost its transplant survival rate. BMJ: British Medical Journal (online), 367, doi:10.1136/bmj.l6033.
   Google Scholar
• English, V., et al., 2019. Is an opt-out system likely to increase organ donation?. BMJ (Online), 364. doi:10.1136/bmj.1967.
   Google Scholar
• Fabre, J., Murphy, P., and Matesanz, R., 2010. Presumed consent: a distraction in the quest for increasing organ donation rates. BMJ (Online), 341 (7779), 922–925. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4973.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Alonso, V., et al., 2020. Facilitators and barriers in the organ donation process: A qualitative study among nurse transplant coordinators. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17 (21), 7996. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, E.M., 2016. Posthumous organ donation attitudes, intentions to donate, and organ donor status: examining the role of the big five personality dimensions and altruism. Personality and individual differences, 88 (January 1, 2016), 182–186. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, H., Blekher, M., and Bosch, D.A., 2018. It is all about control: understanding reluctance to register for organ donation. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 48 (3) (June 1, 2019), 665–680. doi:10.1177/0899764018807755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, M., et al., 2015. Patient perspectives on the learning health system: the importance of trust and shared decision making. The american journal of bioethics, 15 (9), 4–17. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1062163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, S., et al., 2020. The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system. Anaesthesia, 75 (9), 1146–1152. doi:10.1111/anae.15055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A.H., 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50, 370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S.A. 2018. Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html [Accessed 13 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Miracle, V.A., 2016. The Belmont report. Dimensions of critical care nursing, 35 (4), 223–228. doi:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, R., Thomas, R.J., and Jones, C., 2018. Organ donation in Wales: time to reflect. Transplantation, 102 (12), 1961–1962. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000002435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorlock, G., and Draper, H., 2018. Empathy, social media, and directed altruistic living organ donation. Bioethics, 32 (5), 289–297. doi:10.1111/bioe.12438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Service Blood and Transplant. 2020. Organ donation law in Scotland. Available from: https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/uk-laws/organ-donation-law-in-scotland/ [Accessed 21 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., et al., 2019a. Short-term impact of introducing a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales: before and after study. BMJ open, 9 (4), 25159. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., Mclaughlin, L., Morgan, K., et al., 2019b. Process evaluation of specialist nurse implementation of a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 414. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4266-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, K., 2012. The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making? BMC medical ethics, 13 (1), 10. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-13-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prabhu, P.K., 2019. Is presumed consent an ethically acceptable way of obtaining organs for transplant? Journal of the intensive care society, 20 (2), 92–97. doi:10.1177/1751143718777171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Public Health Agency. 2013. Organ donation: Public attitudes and stakeholder engagement in Northern Ireland 2013. https://www.organdonationni.info/sites/default/files/publications/organ%20donation%20report.pdf [Accessed 28 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Rieu, R., 2010. The potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK. Journal of medical ethics, 2010 (36), 534–538. doi:10.1136/jme.2009.031757.
   Google Scholar
• Rudge, C.J., 2018. Organ donation: opting in or opting out? British journal of general practice, 68 (667), 62–63. doi:10.3399/bjgp18X694445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., 2012a. Opt-out organ donation without presumptions. Journal of medical ethics, 38 (2), 69–72. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., 2012b. ‘Altruism or solidarity? The motives for organ donation and two proposals. Bioethics, 26 (7), 376–381. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01989.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streat, S., 2004. Clinical review: moral assumptions and the process of organ donation in the intensive care unit. Critical care. BioMed central, 8 (5), 382–388. doi:10.1186/cc2876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R.H., and Sunstein, C.R., 2008. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York: Penguin Group USA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Medical and Behavioral Research. 1978. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human research (Bethesda, Md.) Available from: https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• The Scottish Parliament. 2018. Human tissue authorisation Scotland bill. Available from: https://beta.parliament.scot/bills/human-tissue-authorisation-scotland-bill [Accessed 21 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• The World Medical Association. 2008. Declaration of Helsinki. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/ [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Tocher, J., et al., 2019. The role of specialist nurses for organ donation: A solution for maximising organ donation rates? Journal of clinical nursing, 28 (9-10), 2020–2027. doi:10.1111/jocn.14741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1997. “Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights: UNESCO.” http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID = 13177&URL_DO = DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION = 201.html [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO 2005. “Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.” http://www.unesco.org/new/en/soc ial-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights/ [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1947. The Nuremberg code. BMJ, 313 (7070) (December 7, 1996), 1448. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ [Accessed 18 February 2021].
   Google Scholar