Prenatal testing, disability equality, and the limits of the law

References

• Abortion Act 1967, c. 87. 1967. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87/contents (Accessed 10 November 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Abortion (Disability Equality) Bill (2016–2017). Parliament: House of Lords. Bill no. 95.
   Google Scholar
• Abortion (Disability Equality) Bill (2017–2019). Parliament: House of Lords. Bill no. 51.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, G.L., and Devlieger, P.J., 1999. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Social science & medicine, 48, 977–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, A., 1999. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy. American journal of public health, 89, 1649–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, J.S., 2021. The disabled contract: severe intellectual disability, justice and morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellieni, C.V., and Buonocore, G., 2009. Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn. Acta paediatrica, 98, 613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgeman, J., 2021. Transforming family responsibilities: children with disabilities, parental responsibility and family life. In: B. Clough and J. Herring, eds. Disability, care and family law. London: Routledge, 120–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, F., 2013. Parliamentary inquiry into abortion on the grounds of disability. House of Commons. Available from: https://dontscreenusout.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Abortion-and-Disability-Report-17-7-13.pdf (Accessed 10 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, R., and Glass, P.-C. 2014. Parliamentary inquiry into childcare for disabled children.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry, S., and Herring, J., 2010. European human rights and family Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• European Convention on Human Rights. (1950). Treaty no. 005. European Court of Human Rights, 1–62. Available from: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf (Accessed 10 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Guon, J., et al., 2014. Our children are not a diagnosis: The experiences of parents who continue their pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18’. American journal of medical genetics part A, 164A, 308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, V., 2015. Care and human rights. In: R. Cruft, S.M. Liao, and M. Renzo, eds. Philosophical foundations of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 624–641.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J., 2015. Re B (A minor) (wardship: medical treatment) [1981]: “The child must live”: disability, parents and the law. In: J. Herring and J. Wall, eds. Landmark cases in medical Law. London: Hart Publishing, 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J., 2017. Compassion, ethics of care and legal rights. International journal of Law in context, 13, 158–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Act. 1998, c. 42. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents (Accessed 10 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Kaposy, C., 2018. Choosing down syndrome: ethics and New prenatal testing technologies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E.F., 2020. Love’s labor: essays on women, equality and dependency. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lord Shinkwin. (2016). ‘Abortion (Disability Equality) Bill [HL]', Hansard: House of Lords Debates, 21 October, 774, c. 2546. Available from: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-10-21/debates/9B082E9E-8E7A-469B-8864-2D14FB44CCE2/Abortion(DisabilityEquality)Bill(HL) (Accessed 10 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service. ‘Screening Tests in Pregnancy: Your Pregnancy and Baby Guide’ (National Health Service, 15 February 2018) Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/screening-tests-in-pregnancy [Accessed 13 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M.C., 2006. Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offences Against the Person Act 1861. c. 100. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/contents (Accessed 10 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Office for Health Improvement & Disparities. 2021. Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2021 (updated 25 August 2022). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-2021/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2021 [Accessed 3 October 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Parens, E., and Asch, A., 1999. Special supplement: The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing reflections and recommendations. The hastings center report, 29 (5), pp. s1–pp.s24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health England. ‘NHS Screening Programmes in England’ (Public Health England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018) Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/783537/NHS_Screening_Programmes_in_England_2017_to_2018_final.pdf  [Accessed 13 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2010. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales (May 2010) Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/other-guidelines-and-reports/termination-of-pregnancy-for-fetal-abnormality-in-england-scotland-and-wales [Accessed 15 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, H.S., 2000. The future of the disabled in liberal society: An ethical analysis. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H., 2019. Abortion on the basis of a risk of disability: The parents’ interests and shared interests. In: A.M. Phillips, T.C. de Campos, and J. Herring, eds. Philosophical foundations of medical Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H. 2022. The disabled contract: severe intellectual disability, justice and morality by Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry. Modern Law Review (book review, published online) Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.11111468-2230.12739.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S., and Wilkinson, S., 2001. Termination of pregnancy for reason of foetal disability: Are there grounds for a special exception in Law?. Medical law review, 9, 85–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skotko, B.G., Levine, S.P., and Goldstein, R., 2011. Having a son or daughter with down syndrome: perspectives from mothers and fathers’. American journal of medical genetics part A, 155, 2335–2347.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, A., 2014. Far from the tree: parents, children and the search for identity. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S.C., 2018. Perfectly human: nine months with Cerian. Walden, NY: Plough Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J., 2007. End-of-life decisions, quality of life and the newborn. Acta paediatrica, 96, 790–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar