Publication Cover
The New Bioethics
A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body
Volume 30, 2024 - Issue 1
191
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Ethico-Legal Analysis of Artificial Womb Technology and Extracorporeal Gestation Based on Islamic Legal Maxims

, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adkins, V., 2020. Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth. Journal of medical ethics, 47 (4), 239–243.
  • Arif, A.A., 2011. Qaḍāyā Fiqhiyyah fī Naql al-Aʿḍā’ al-Bashariyyah. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM, 23–24.
  • Bokek-Cohen, Y. A., and Tarabeih, M., 2022. What do Sunni Muslims think about religiously forbidden reproductive options?. Human fertility, 25 (4), 764–775.
  • Carter, C.S., 2021. Oxytocin and love: myths, metaphors and mysteries. Compr psychoneuroendocrinol, 9, 100107.
  • Cavaliere, G., 2020. Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective. Journal of medical ethics, 46 (2), 76–82.
  • De Bie, F.R., Kim, S.D., Bose, S.K., Nathanson, P., Partridge, E.A., Flake, A.W. and Feudtner, C., 2023. Ethics considerations regarding artificial womb technology for the fetonate. The American Journal of Bioethics, 23 (5), 67–78.
  • Flake, A.W., 2022. A supportive physiologic environment for the extreme premature infant: improving life outside the womb. Journal of pediatric surgery, 57 (2), 167–171.
  • Gad El Hak, A.G.H. In vitro fertilization and test tube baby. Dar El Iftaa, Cairo, Egypt (1980), 1225:1:115; 3213e3228.
  • Ghaly, M., 2012. The beginning of human life: Islamic bioethical perspectives. Zygon, 47 (1), 175–213.
  • Ghaly M, et al., 2020. Islamic ethics and infertility treatment. Doha, Qatar: world innovation summit for health (WISH). https://2020.wish.org.qa/app/uploads/2020/11/IMPJ7849-R10-Islamic-Ethics-and-Infertility-201111-WEB.pdf [Accessed 1 September 2022].
  • Horn, C., 2021. Abortion rights after artificial wombs: why decriminalisation is needed ahead of ectogenesis. Medical law review, 29 (1), 80–105.
  • Hornick, M.A., et al., 2019 Dec. Technical feasibility of umbilical cannulation in midgestation lambs supported by the EXTra-uterine environment for neonatal development (EXTEND). Artificial organs, 43 (12), 1154–1161.
  • Ibrahim, A.H., et al., 2019. Maqasid al-Sharīʿah Based Islamic bioethics: a comprehensive approach. Journal of bioethical inquiry, 16 (3), 333–345.
  • Isa, N.M., 2021. Human germline gene editing from Maslahah perspective: the case of the world's first gene edited babies. Journal of bioethical inquiry, 18 (2), 349–355.
  • Khan, M.A.Z., and Konje, J.C., 2019. Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 232, 5–9.
  • Kimberly, L.L., Sutter, M.E., and Quinn, G.P., 2020 May. Equitable access to ectogenesis for sexual and gender minorities. Bioethics, 34 (4), 338–345.
  • Maulod, A., 2021. Coming home to one's self: Butch Muslim masculinities and negotiations of piety, sex, and parenthood in Singapore. Journal of homosexuality, 68 (7), 1106–1143.
  • Mercurio, M.R., 2018. The EXTEND system for extrauterine support of extremely premature neonates: opportunity and caution. Pediatric research, 84 (6), 795–796.
  • Mohammed, K., 2005. The Islamic law maxims. Islamic studies, 44 (2), 191–207.
  • Padela, A., 2022. Maqāṣidī models for an “Islamic” medical ethics. Problem-solving or confusing at the bedside? American journal of Islam and society, 39 (1-2), 72–114.
  • Padela, A.I., Klima, K., and Duivenbode, R., 2020. Producing parenthood: Islamic bioethical perspectives & normative implications. The new bioethics, 26 (1), 17–37.
  • Partridge, E.A., et al., 2017 Apr 25. An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb. Nature communications, 8, 15112.
  • Pew Research centre. 2022. The future of world religions: population growth projections, 2010-2050. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/ [Accessed: 1 September 2022].
  • Räsänen, J., 2023. Regulating abortion after ectogestation. Journal of medical ethics, 49, 419–422.
  • Segers, S., Pennings, G., and Mertes, H., 2020. The ethics of ectogenesis-aided foetal treatment. Bioethics, 34, 364–370.
  • Segers, S., 2021. The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges. BMC medical ethics, 22 (1), 59.
  • Tsarna, E., et al., 2022. The impact of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome on psychology, quality of life, and sexual life of patients: a systematic review. Children (Basel), 9 (4), 484.
  • Usuda, H., et al., 2019. Reply. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 221, 369–370.
  • Werner, K.M., and Mercurio, M.R., 2022. Ethical considerations in the use of artificial womb/placenta technology. Seminars in perinatology, 46 (3), 151521.
  • Zaami, S., et al., 2021 Dec. From the maternal uterus to the “uterus device"? Ethical and scientific considerations on partial ectogenesis. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 25 (23), 7354–7362.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.