Women’s reproductive choice and (elective) egg freezing: is an extension of the storage limit missing a bigger issue?

References

• Alteri, A., et al., 2019. Elective egg freezing without medical indications. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica, 98 (5), 647–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2013. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertility and sterility, 99 (1), 37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.A., Davies, M.C., and Lavery, S.A., 2020. Elective egg freezing for non-medical reasons: scientific impact paper No. 63. Bjog: An international journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 127 (9), e113–e121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. 2012. Eggsurance launches independent community and educational website devoted to everything egg freezing. GlobeNewswire. Available from: https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2012/05/22/1265167/0/en/Eggsurance-Launches-Independent-Community-and-Educational-Website-Devoted-to-Everything-Egg-Freezing.html [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2020a. Leading doctors back egg freezing extension. Express & Star News. Available from: https://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk-news/2020/02/27/leading-doctors-back-egg-freezing-extension/ [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2020b. Leading doctors back egg freezing extension. itv News. Available from: https://www.itv.com/news/2020-02-27/leading-doctors-back-egg-freezing-extension/ [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2021. Egg freezing expert welcomes move to extend storage time from 10 to 55 years. De Montfort University. Available from: https://www.dmu.ac.uk/about-dmu/news/2021/september/egg-freezing-expert-welcomes-move-to-extend-storage-time-from-10-to-55-years.aspx [Accessed 15 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, K., 2019. Egg freezing, fertility and reproductive choice: negotiating responsibility, hope and modern motherhood. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, K., et al., 2019. Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics & gynecology, 40 (2), 166–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, K., and Culley, L., 2018. Women’s experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and ‘going it alone’. Human fertility, 23 (3), 186–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barritt, J., et al., 2007. Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertility and sterility, 87 (1), 189–e13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC News. 2019. Frozen eggs storage 10-year limit ‘should be changed’. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-50182675 [Accessed 16 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Bearne, S. 2019. Single women are paying thousands to freeze their eggs – but at what cost? The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/mar/23/single-women-are-paying-thousands-to-freeze-their-eggs-but-at-what-cost [Accessed 12 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., 2001. Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance. Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 22 (5), 461–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, B.A., et al., 1998. Prenatal genetic testing: content of discussions between obstetric providers and pregnant women. Obstetrics & gynecology, 91, 648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch Petersen, K., et al., 2017. The fertility assessment and counseling clinic–does the concept work? A prospective 2-year follow-up study of 519 women. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica, 96 (3), 313–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Fertility Society. 2022. A guide to fertility: what reproductive technologies are available to influence fertility? FEI. Available from: https://www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk/fei/what-reproductive-technologies-are-available-to-influence-fertility/ [Accessed 15 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• British Fertility Society. 2024. About Fertility Educational Initiative. Available from: https://www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk/special-interest-groups/fertility-education-initiative/about-fei/ [Accessed 21 February 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Cobo, A., and García-Velasco, J.A., 2016. Why all women should freeze their eggs. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 28 (3), 206–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantine, M.L., et al., 2014. Imperfect informed consent for prenatal screening: lessons from the quad screen. Clinical ethics, 9 (1), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R.S., 1993. Aspects of the history of prenatal diagnosis. Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 8 (Suppl. 1), 10–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowan, R.S., 2008. Heredity and hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, A., et al., 2011. Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension. Nature reviews genetics, 12 (9), 657–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, A., et al., 2014. Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection. Human genetics, 133 (2), 163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health & Social Care. 2021. Gamete (egg, sperm) and embryo storage limits: response to consultation, consultation outcome. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/egg-sperm-and-embryo-storage-limits/outcome/gamete-egg-sperm-and-embryo-storage-limits-response-to-consultation [Accessed 14 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, H. 2019. Fertility experts call for ditching of UK's 10-year limit on egg-freezing. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jan/22/fertility-experts-call-for-ditching-of-uks-10-year-limit-on-egg-freezing [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Dondorp, W., et al., 2015. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. European journal of human genetics, 23 (11), 1438–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. 2018. Only 7 percent of social egg freezers have returned for fertility treatment at a large European center: still little known about outcome in this increasingly popular fertility service. ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180703190741.htm [Accessed 14 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, O., et al., 2018. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2016. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, N. 2020. Why the UK Government should modernise the law on embryo and gamete storage. PET. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/why-the-uk-government-should-modernise-the-law-on-embryo-and-gamete-storage/ [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Goold, I., and Savulescu, J., 2009. In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics, 23 (1), 47–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J.M., et al., 2004. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health technology assessment, 8 (33), 1–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, E.A., et al., 2018. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertility and sterility, 109 (6), 1097–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtin, Ζ. 2019. More and more women are freezing their eggs – but only 21% of those who use them have become mothers. Conversation UK. Available from: https://theconversation.com/more-and-more-women-are-freezing-their-eggs-but-only-21-of-those-who-use-them-have-become-mothers-117028 [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Harbers, H., 2005. Inside the politics of technology: agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, J., et al., 2017. The need to improve fertility awareness. Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 4, 18–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harwood, K., 2009. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics, 23 (1), 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, K.A., 2015. On the ethics of social egg freezing and fertility preservation for nonmedical reasons. Medicolegal and bioethics, 5, 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 2019. PET's #ExtendTheLimit campaign to change the storage limit for social egg freezing launches. PET. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/pets-extendthelimit-campaign-to-change-the-storage-limit-for-social-egg-freezing-launches/ [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• HL Deb (Baroness Deech). 22 October 2019. vol. 800 col. 555. Available from: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-10-22/debates/7DB58FBA-ABFE-4037-84AC-103A1555D4CD/Queen%E2%80%99SSpeech#contribution-BBB6D7D5-D819-4213-96EC-22CFE9D32D09 [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). 2020. Press release: age is the key factor for egg freezing success says new HFEA report, as overall treatment numbers remain low. HFEA. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-press-releases/2018-news-and-press-releases/press-release-age-is-the-key-factor-for-egg-freezing-success-says-new-hfea-report-as-overall-treatment-numbers-remain-low/ [Accessed 10 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). 2021. Fertility treatment 2019: trends and figures. HFEA. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/fertility-treatment-2019-trends-and-figures/ [Accessed 12 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Hvidman, H.W., et al., 2015. Individual fertility assessment and pro-fertility counselling; should this be offered to women and men of reproductive age? Human reproduction, 30 (1), 9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, E., 2018. The ambiguities of ‘social’ egg freezing and the challenges of informed consent. Biosocieties, 13 (1), 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaques, A.M., Sheffield, L.J., and Halliday, J.L., 2005. Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for down syndrome. Prenatal diagnosis, 25 (8), 656–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellings, J. 2020. Egg freezing time limit … time for a change. Family Law LexisNexis. Available from: https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/egg-freezing-time-limit-time-for-a-change [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B.P., Serhal, P., and Ben-Nagi, J., 2018. Social egg freezing should be offered to single women approaching their late thirties: FOR: women should not suffer involuntary childlessness because they have not yet found a partner. Bjog: an international journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 125 (12), 1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justo Aznar, M.D., and Pharm, J.T.C., 2019. Social freezing: analysis of an ethical dilemma. Ethics & medicine, 35 (3), 161–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kater-Kuipers, A., et al., 2020. Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: an ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Bioethics, 34(7), 671–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, A., and Shakespeare, T., 2002. Genetic politics: from eugenics to genome. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koert, E., et al., 2020. Women’s perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a fertility assessment and counselling clinic in Denmark. Human reproduction open, 2020 (4), hoaa036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kondapalli, L., Hong, H. and Garcia, C., 2010. Clinical cases in oncofertility. In: T. Woodruff, L. Zoloth, L. Campo-Engelstein, and S. Rodriguez, eds. Oncofertility: ethical, legal, social, and medical perspectives. New York, NY: Springer, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• La Ferla, R. 2018. Why fertility clinics are throwing 'egg freezing' parties with champagne and canapés. Independent. Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/egg-freezing-party-women-fertility-preservation-millennial-a8520996.html [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, E. 2020. Leading medics back egg freezing extension. PET. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/leading-medics-back-egg-freezing-extension/ [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Lemoine, M.E., and Ravitsky, V., 2015. Sleepwalking into infertility: the need for a public health approach toward advanced maternal age. The American journal of bioethics, 15 (11), 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman, A., 1991. Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American journal of law & medicine, 17, 15–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwy, I., 2014. Prenatal diagnosis: the irresistible rise of the ‘visible fetus’. Studies in history and philosophy of science part C: studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 47, 290–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmoud, Z. 2021. #ExtendTheLimit: What now for egg freezing? PET. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/extendthelimit-what-now-for-egg-freezing/ [Accessed 12 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Manchester University, NHS Foundation Trust. 2017. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Information for patients. Saint Mary’s Hospital Department of Reproductive Medicine. Available from: https://mft.nhs.uk/app/uploads/sites/4/2018/04/OHSS-October-2017.pdf [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Manson, N.C., and O'Neill, O., 2007. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, L., et al., 2015. Social egg freezing: a reproductive chance or smoke and mirrors? Croatian medical journal, 56 (4), 387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo Clinic. 2021. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Mayo Clinic. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/ovarian-hyperstimulation-syndrome-ohss/symptoms-causes/syc-20354697 [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, J. 2019. Women's frozen eggs ‘should be stored for longer’. BBC News. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-46923329 [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• McManus, L. 2020. Leading doctors back plans to extend the time women can freeze their eggs to delay having a baby for longer than 10 years. MailOnline. Available from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8047683/New-freezing-technique-means-mothers-store-eggs-current-10-year-limit.html [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Meierhans, J. 2021. Frozen eggs and sperm storage limit increased to 55 years. BBC. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58456832 [Accessed 08 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Mertes, H., and Pennings, G., 2011. Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. Reproductive biomedicine online, 23 (7), 824–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Money-Coutts, S. 2020. Why women should be able to freeze their eggs for more than ten years. The Times. Available from: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/why-women-should-be-able-to-freeze-their-eggs-for-more-than-ten-years-r3ks9xgtl?fbclid=IwAR11VGB0KM4WiDeAbpSdTWm [Accessed 2 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. 2015. ‘Chilling out’ at an egg freezing party. BBC News. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-31910541 [Accessed 16 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Moss, R. 2019. Women should be able to freeze eggs for more than 10 years, say campaigners. Huffpost. Available from: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/extendthelimit-for-10-year-egg-freezing-limit-campaigners-urge_uk_5db6a178e4b079eb95a66661?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANU646fhJ2CHjnjz17EV6GUPHSDgUO8Bv46ZIgvDle7widJ8t_tW4CL9RKDT06YK7K8QuXKoLLYCOP0emveEm0Okul49zLoP5O6pMlTmGDTaAb_z910XSGZJuZfK2eV37H8jncTYIGM0HwfJsE9bh0pd6fMzVH5fO8WB9orV0Lbr&guccounter=2 [Accessed 16 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Nakou, P., 2021. Is routine prenatal screening and testing fundamentally incompatible with a commitment to reproductive choice? Learning from the historical context. Medicine, health care and philosophy, 24 (1), 73–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nargund, G. 2019. We must smash the 10-year limit on egg freezing if we want women to be equal. The Telegraph. Available from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/must-smash-10-year-limit-egg-freezing-want-women-equal/ [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• NHS. 2021a. Overview-IVF. NHS. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/ivf/ [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• NHS. 2021b. Risks-IVF. NHS. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/ivf/risks/ [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2020. Bioethics briefing note: egg freezing in the UK. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Available from: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Egg-freezing-in-the-UK.pdf [Accessed 13 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., 2020. Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, provisional: mid-2019. Hampshire: Office for National Statistics. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2019estimates [Accessed 14 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, G., 2013. Ethical aspects of social freezing. Gynécologie obstétrique & fertilité, 41 (9), 521–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petropanagos, A., et al., 2015. Social egg freezing: risk, benefits and other considerations. Canadian medical association journal, 187 (9), 666–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platts, S., et al., 2021. Exploring women’s attitudes, knowledge, and intentions to use oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons: a systematic review. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica, 100 (3), 383–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, N., and Browner, C.H., 1997. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Social science & medicine, 45 (7), 979–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitsky, V., 2017. The shifting landscape of prenatal testing: between reproductive autonomy and public health. Hastings center report, 47, S34–S40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). 2016. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) patient information leaflet. RCOG. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/for-the-public/browse-all-patient-information-leaflets/ovarian-hyperstimulation-syndrome-patient-information-leaflet/ [Accessed 13 July 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). 2019. Better for women. Improving the health and wellbeing of girls and women. RCOG. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/confusing-fertility-advice-sparking-unnecessary-worry-among-uk-women/ [Accessed 21 February 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). 2020. UK law on storage limit for egg freezing is too restrictive, say RCOG and BFS. RCOG. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/uk-law-on-storage-limit-for-egg-freezing-is-too-restrictive/ [Accessed 15 July 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Rybak, E.A., and Lieman, H.J., 2009. Egg freezing, procreative liberty, and ICSI: the double standards confronting elective self-donation of oocytes. Fertility and sterility, 92 (5), 1509–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salecl, R., 2010. Motherhood: from rights to choices. Studies in the maternal, 2 (1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J., and Goold, I., 2008. Freezing eggs for lifestyle reasons. The American journal of bioethics, 8 (6), 32–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, D., Netzer, C., and Henn, W., 2009. An offer you can't refuse? Ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Nature reviews genetics, 10 (8), 515–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seavilleklein, V., 2009. Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening. Bioethics, 23 (1), 68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S. 2018. Doctors warn of ignoring downsides of social egg freezing. PET. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/doctors-warn-of-ignoring-downsides-of-social-egg-freezing/ [Accessed 12 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Slater, A. 2020. Frozen fertility: The challenges of storing eggs, sperm and embryos. PET. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/frozen-fertility-the-challenges-of-storing-eggs-sperm-and-embryos/ [Accessed 12 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• SMC. 2021. Expert reaction to news that the UK government will be raising the time limit on storage of frozen eggs, sperm and embryos to a maximum of 55 years. Science Media Centre. Available from: https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-news-that-the-uk-government-will-be-raising-the-time-limit-on-storage-of-frozen-eggs-sperm-and-embryos-to-a-maximum-of-55-years/#:~:text=The%20UK%20government%20has%20announced,a%20maximum%20of%2055%20years[Accessed 5 October 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2019. Canadian fertility clinic reports 180% increase in elective egg freezing. Global Newa. Available from: https://globalnews.ca/news/4903303/family-matters-fertility-clinic-180-increase-social-egg-freezing/ [Accessed 8 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D.K., Shaw, R.W., and Marteau, T.M., 1994. Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down's syndrome: the gap between policy and practice. BMJ, 309 (6957), 776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, G., 2017. Qualifying choice: ethical refection on the scope of prenatal screening. Medicine, health care and philosophy, 20 (2), 195–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, S.M., 2002. The routinization of prenatal testing. American journal of law & medicine, 28 (2-3), 233–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthersan, D., Kennedy, S., and Chapman, M., 2011. Physical symptoms throughout IVF cycles. Human fertility, 14 (2), 122–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymstra, T., 1989. The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of “anticipated decision regret”. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 5 (2), 207–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tymstra, T., 1991. Prenatal diagnosis, prenatal screening, and the rise of the tentative pregnancy. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 7 (4), 509–516.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Den Berg, M., et al., 2005. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genetics in medicine, 7 (5), 332–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, M., et al., 2008. Understanding pregnant women's decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health psychology, 27 (4), 430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Wiel, L., et al., 2020. The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites. Reproductive biomedicine online, 41 (5), 801–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstone, M., et al., 2018. Women’s perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions. Bmc medical ethics, 19 (1), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varlas, V.N., et al., 2021. Social freezing: pressing pause on fertility. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (15), 8088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., 2015. Banking time’: egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Culture, health & sexuality, 17 (4), 470–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, E.S., 2012. How the pill became a lifestyle drug: the pharmaceutical industry and birth control in the United States since 1960. American journal of public health, 102 (8), 1462–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg, A.L., 2020. Social freezing of oocytes: a means to take control of your fertility. Upsala journal of medical sciences, 125 (2), 95–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G., 1964. Legal and illegal abortion. The British journal of criminology, 4 (6), 557–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C., et al., 2002. Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening. Social science & medicine, 55 (5), 743–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar