Reclaiming a restorative understanding of the victim–offender dichotomy

References

• Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation. (2011, March). Updated guidelines for federal officials to fulfil the duty to consult. Retrieved from www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100014664/1100100014675
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (350 B.C.E.). Rhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts. Retrieved from www.classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/rhetoric.html
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, J.-A., Taylor-Butts, A. & Johnson, S. (2006). Victimization and offending among the aboriginal population in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Retrieved from www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/85-002-x2006003-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Victims Bill of Rights. S.C. (2015). c. 13, s. 2 Assented to 2015-04-23. www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-23.7/page-1.html
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, L. & McKay, C. (2006). A review of research on criminal victimization and First Nations, Métis and Inuit Peoples 1990 to 2001. Retrieved from www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/aj-ja/rr06_vic1/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Chau, P. (2012). Poverty, distributive justice, and punishment. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 25, 39–52. doi: 10.1017/S0841820900005324
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, L. (2012). Homelessness, poverty, and incarceration: The criminalization of despair. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(5), 439–456. doi: 10.1080/15228932.2012.713835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2, 11–52.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, R. F. & Sherrard, M. (2005). The big chill? Contextual judgment after R. v. Hamilton and Mason. Dalhousie Law Journal, 28, 409–441.
   Google Scholar
• Directive. 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council if 25 October establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220JHA. Retrieved from www.eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1421925131614&uri=CELEX:32012L0029
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, H. (2016). Navigating through narratives of despair: making space for the Cree reasonable person in the Canadian justice system. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 67, 269–312.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2017). Collapsing the labels ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ in the Victims’ Directive and the paradox of restorative justice. This issue.
   Google Scholar
• Geraghty, S. (2016). How the criminalization of poverty has become normalized in American culture and why you should care. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 21(2), 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Gotell, L. (2008). Rethinking affirmative consent in Canadian sexual assault law: neoliberal sexual subjects and risky women. Akron Law Review, 41(4), 865–898.
   Google Scholar
• Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests). (2004). 3 S.C.R. 511.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, W. C. (2000). From social justice to criminal justice: poverty and the administration of criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honoré, T. (1999). Responsibility and fault. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, D. E. (2004). Inequality, crime and sentencing: Borde, Hamilton and the relevance of social disadvantage in Canadian sentencing law. Queen's Law Journal, 30, 114–155.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, G. (2017). Restorative justice for victims: inherent limits? This issue.
   Google Scholar
• Larcombe, W. (2002). The ‘ideal’ victim of successful rape complainants: not what you might expect. Feminist Legal Studies, 10, 131–148. doi: 10.1023/A:1016060424945
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2017). What Pollock and Rothko may have announced and restorative justice may have to deal with: sovereign victim culture. This issue.
   Google Scholar
• Natapoff, A. (2015). Gideon’s servants and the criminalization of poverty. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 12, 445–466.
   Google Scholar
• Nelund, A. (2017). The marginalized woman: thinking beyond victim/offender in restorative justice. This issue.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkin, S. (2012). Down but not out: Re-evaluating the use of social context evidence in sentencing. Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues, 32, 159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlich, G. (2005). Governing paradoxes of restorative justice. London: Glasshouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlich, G. (2017). Restorative justice and the rights of the accused. This issue.
   Google Scholar
• R. v. Gladue, 1 S.C.R. 688 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Salm, J. & Coelho, A. M. S. (2017). Revisiting the governing paradoxes of restorative justice: a comparative critical discourse analysis of the Ibero-American and Belgian Declarations on Juvenile Restorative Justice. This issue.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, S. (2017). Reshaping relations to fit justice aims. This issue.
   Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation commission of Canada. Winnipeg: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Victims’ Rights in Canada. (2015). Prepared by the Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime. Retrieved from www.crcvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/victims-rights_paper_DISCLAIMER_Feb2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walkate, S. (2008). Changing boundaries of the ‘victim’ in restorative justice: so who is the victim now? In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 273–285). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walkate, S. (2017). Witnessing and Victimhood. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Criminology and Criminal Justice. Retrieved from www.criminology.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-207
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2015). Changing lenses: restorative justice for our times (25th anniversary ed.). Harrisonburg: Herald Press.
   Google Scholar