References
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: Are vision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
- Berrett, D. (2012, February 19). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
- Cambridge English. (2015). Empower. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from www.cambridge.or.g
- Council of Europe. (2014). Common European framework of reference for language: Learning, teaching and assessment. Retrieved from www.coe.int/Inag-CEFR
- Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. doi: 10.2167/beb459.0
- Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970–977. doi: 10.1119/1.1374249
- Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrolment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783
- EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research (ECAR). (2012). 7 Things you should know about flipped classrooms. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/educause.edu/eli
- Fitzpatrick, M. (2012, June 24). Classroom lectures go digital. The New York Times.
- Marsh, D. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A development trajectory. Córdoba, Provincia de Córdoba: Edita Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba.
- Mazur, Eric. (2009). Farewell, Lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50–51. doi: 10.1126/science.1168927
- Pérez Gómez, A. (2015). Una nueva pedagogía para una nueva era y una nueva sociedad en Hacer bien, pensar bien y sentir bien. Editorial UNAE. Retrieved from www.unae.edu.ec