The effects of text length on reading abilities in accelerated reading tasks

References

• American Speech-Language and Hearing Association. (1997). Guidelines for audiologic screening: ASHA panel on audiologic assessment. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/policy/GL1997-00199.htm#sec1.8
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, B. F., Brodeur, D. A., Waschbusch, D. A., Stewart, S. H., & McGee, R. (2009). Selective and sustained attention as predictors of social problems in children with typical and disordered attention abilities. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12, 341–352. doi: 10.1177/1087054708320440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 263–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 325–346. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.902461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Kochva, I., & Hasselhorn, M. (2015). In search of methods enhancing fluency in reading: An examination of the relations between time constraints and processes of reading in readers of German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 140, 140–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 244–255. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (1987). Increasing first grader’s reading accuracy and comprehension by accelerating their reading rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 236–242. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (1988). Reading performance of first graders: The effects of pictorial distractors. The Journal of Educational Research, 82, 47–52. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1988.10885864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (1997a). Effects of accelerated reading rate on memory for text among dyslexic readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 289–297. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (1997b). Enhancing the reading of dyslexic children by reading acceleration and auditory masking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 103–113. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (1997c). Reading rate acceleration: Developmental aspects. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 427–441. doi: 10.1080/00221329709596680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z. (2012). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z., & Leikin, M. (2001). Effects of accelerated reading rate on processing words’ syntactic functions by normal and dyslexic readers: Event related potentials evidence. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 276–296. doi: 10.1080/00221320109597484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z., & Share, D. (2002). Introduction on timing and phonology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1-2), 1–3. doi: 10.1023/A:1013810702543
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z., & Share, D. L. (1992). The effect of accelerated reading rate on memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 193–199. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z., Shaul, S., Horowitz-Kraus, T., Sela, I., Nevat, M., & Karni, A. (2013). Enhanced reading by training with imposed time constraint in typical and dyslexic adults. Nature Communications, 4, 1–6. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Z., Shaul, S., Horowitz-Kraus, T., Sela, I., Nevat, M., & Karni, A. (2013). Enhanced reading by training with imposed time constraint in typical and dyslexic adults. Nature Communications, 4, 1–6. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M., Rastatter, M. P., Walker, M. M., & O’Brien, K. (2009). The effects of frequency altered feedback on the reading processes of adults with reading disorders. Neuroscience Letters, 461(2), 69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. D., Walker, M. M., & O'Brien, K. (2015). The effects of rate on single-word reading assessment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(1), 13. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-14-0021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Manual for the new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
   Google Scholar
• Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Stolzenberg, J., Hatzes, N., & Madaus, J. (1995). Methodological issues in assessing the relationship among ADD, medication effects and reading performance. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: CBS College.
   Google Scholar
• Erbay, F. (2013). Predictive power of attention and reading readiness variables on auditory reasoning and processing skills of six-year old children. Educational Services: Theory & Practice, 13, 422–429.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Catts, H. W., & Tomblin, J. B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. A. Stahl & S. G. Paris (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369–394). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Frase, L. T. (1967). Learning from prose materialLength of passage, knowledge of results, and position of questions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5, 266–272. doi: 10.1037/h0025028
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (1977). Fry’s readability graph: Clarification validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242–252.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Barrera, M. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & Bandalos, D. (2011). Theoretical and statistical derivation of a screener for the behavioral assessment of executive functions in children. Psychological Assessment, 23, 64–79. doi: 10.1037/a0021097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A., & Britton, B. (1996). Five metaphors for text understanding. In A. Graesser & B. Britton (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 341–351). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz-Kraus, T., Cicchino, N., Amiel, M., Holland, S. K., & Breznitz, Z. (2014). Reading improvement in English- and Hebrew-speaking children with reading difficulties after reading acceleration training. Annals of Dyslexia, 64, 183–201. doi: 10.1007/s11881-014-0093-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karni, A., Morocz, I. A., Bitan, T., Shaul, S., Kushnir, T., & Breznitz, Z. (2005). An fMRI study of the differential effects of word presentation rates (reading acceleration) on dyslexic readers’ brain activity patterns. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 197–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., & Betjemann, R. S. (2006). Comprehending the gray oral reading test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 363–380. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. doi: 10.1080/10888430802132279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikin, M., & Breznitz, Z. (2001). Effects of accelerated reading rate on syntactic processing of Hebrew sentences: Electrophysiological evidence. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 127, 194–209.
   Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 302–320. doi: 10.1037/a0025250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, T., Korinth, S. P., Linkersdörfer, J., Lonnemann, J., Rump, B., Hasselhorn, M., & Lindberg, S. (2015). Text-fading based training leads to transfer effects on children's sentence reading fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedo, J., Lee, Y.-L., Breznitz, Z., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Computerized silent reading rate and strategy instruction for fourth graders at risk in silent reading rate. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 37, 100–110. doi: 10.1177/0731948713507263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., Swanson, H. L., & Geraghty, C. (2010). Improvement in reading rate under independent and difficult text levels: Influences on word and comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 1–19. doi: 10.1037/a0017488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D. (2011). Testing the acceleration hypothesis: Fluency outcomes utilizing still-versu accelerated-text in sixth-grade students with reading disabilities. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 294–312. doi: 10.1080/19388071.2010.518661
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, C. M., Sperling, R. A., & Dornisch, M. M. (2010). A comparison of the effects of students’ expository text comprehension strategies. Instructional Science, 38, 551–570. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9081-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, E. Z., & Billington, M. J. (1983). Passage length and recall with test size held constant: Effects of modality, pacing, and learning set. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 667–681. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90395-X
   Google Scholar
• Snellings, P., van der Leij, A., de Jong, P. F., & Blok, H. (2009). Enhancing the reading fluency and comprehension of children with reading disabilities in an orthographically transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 291–305. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin: TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray oral reading tests (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B., & Woodwyk, J. M. (2010). Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 341–362. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar