Delayed silent phoneme monitoring in adults who do and do not stutter

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (1997). Guidelines for audiologic screening [Guidelines]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. D., & Wagovich, S. A. (2010). Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35, 216–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. D., Wagovich, S. A., & Hall, N. E. (2006). Nonword repetition skills in young children who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 177–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, A. (2007). Working memory involvement in stuttering: Exploring the evidence and research implications. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 32, 218–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, A., Saltuklaroglu, T., & Kalinowski, J. (2012). Autonomic arousal in adults who stutter prior to various reading tasks intended to elicit changes in stuttering frequency. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. T., Coalson, G. A., McGill, M., & Gkalitsiou, Z. (2016, June). Exploring the relationship between phonological working memory and stuttering. Paper presented at the International Fluency Association 8th World Congress, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. T., McGill, M., & Usler, E. (2015). Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter: Vocal versus nonvocal performance differences. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 44, 17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. T., Sheng, L., Gkalitsiou, Z., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2015). Veridical and false recall in adults who stutter. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58, 28–42. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-13-0301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. T., Vallely, M., Anderson, J., & Sussman, H. (2012). Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 188–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. T., Wolk, L., & Davis, B. L. (2007). Role of phonology in childhood stuttering. In E. Conture, & R. Curlee (Eds.), Stuttering and related disorders of fluency (pp. 168–182). New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Dell, G. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2011). Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 109–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalson, G. A., & Byrd, C. T. (2015). Metrical encoding in adults who do and do not stutter. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58, 601–621. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalson, G. A., & Byrd, C. T. (2017). Nonword repetition in adults who stutter: The effects of stimuli stress and auditory-orthographic cues. PLoS ONE, 12, e0188111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. (2003). Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56, 1213–1236. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim, H. B., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2004). Nonword repetition abilities of children who stutter: An exploratory study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 29, 179–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Studies on verbal self-monitoring: The perceptual loop model and beyond. In A. S. Meyer, L. R. Wheeldon, & A. Krott (Eds.), Automaticity and control in language processing (pp. 93–121). Brussels: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawelka, S., Huber, C., & Wimmer, H. (2006). Impaired visual processing of letter and digit strings in adult dyslexic readers. Vision Research, 46, 718–723. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. S., Yaruss, J. S., Quesal, R. W., Terranova, V., & Whalen, D. H. (2015). Responses of adults who stutter to the anticipation of stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 45, 38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 480–486. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansma, B. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2004). Monitoring syllable boundaries during speech production. Brain and Language, 90, 311–317. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00443-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., Zhang, F., Tsai, E., & Puls, B. (2014). Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 673–680. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlow, C. L., Siren, K., & Zikria, M. (1997). Speech production learning in adults with chronic developmental stuttering. In W. Hulstijn, H. F. M. Peters, & P. H. H. M. van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research, and fluency disorders (pp. 221–230). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nippold, M. A. (2002). Stuttering and phonology: Is there an interaction? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 99–110. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2002/011)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brian, S., Packman, A., Onslow, M., & O’Brian, N. (2004). Measurement of stuttering in adults: Comparison of stuttering-rate and severity-scaling methods. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1081–1087. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/080)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X.-F. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387–401. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasisekaran, J. (2014). Exploring the link between stuttering and phonology: A review and implications for treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 35, 95–113. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasisekaran, J., & de Nil, L. F. (2006). Phoneme monitoring in silent naming and perception in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 284–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasisekaran, J., de Nil, L. F., Smyth, R., & Johnson, C. (2006). Phonological encoding in the silent speech of persons who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasisekaran, J., & Weisberg, S. (2014). Practice and retention of nonwords in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 41, 55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O. (2005). Verbal self-monitoring. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 245–261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smits-Bandstra, S. (2010). Methodological considerations in the measurement of reaction time in persons who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35, 19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, C., & Weber-Fox, C. (2014). Preschool speech articulation and nonword repetition abilities may help predict eventual recovery or persistence of stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 41, 32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). The international classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). 4th edition, volume 1. Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.html.
   Google Scholar
• van Lieshout, P., Ben-David, B., Lipski, M., & Namasivayam, A. (2014). The impact of threat and cognitive stress on speech motor control in people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 40, 93–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processes – second edition (CTOPP-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processes (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311–334. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Morgan, J. L. (2002). Phoneme monitoring in internal and external speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 503–535. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar