190
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of noise on speech intelligibility and cognitive skills by ages

ORCID Icon &
Pages 58-66 | Received 23 Nov 2022, Accepted 25 Aug 2023, Published online: 11 Sep 2023

References

  • Akeroyd, M. A. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S53–S71.
  • Anstey, K. J., Matters, B., Brown, A. K., & Lord, S. R. (2000). Normative data on neuropsychological tests for very old adults living in retirement villages and hostels. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 309–317.
  • Ardila, A., & Rosselli, M. (1989). Neuropsychological characteristics of normal aging. Developmental Neuropsychology, 5, 307–320.
  • Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 352–364.
  • Colom, R., Shih, P. C., Flores-Mendoza, C., & Quiroga, M. A. (2006). The real relationship between short-term memory and working memory. Memory, 14, 804–813.
  • Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Scott, S. J., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100.
  • Cramer, J. L., & Donai, J. J. (2019). Effects of signal bandwidth on listening effort in young-and middle-aged adults. International Journal of Audiology, 58(2), 116–122.
  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and Reading. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav, 19, 450–466.
  • Dupuis, K., Marchuk, V., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2016). Noise affects performance on the Montreal cognitive assessment. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 35, 298–307.
  • Frtusova, J. B., Winneke, A. H., & Phillips, N. A. (2013). ERP evidence that auditory–visual speech facilitates working memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 481–494.
  • Füllgrabe, C., & Rosen, S. (2016a). Investigating the role of working memory in speech-in-noise identification for listeners with normal hearing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 894, 29–36.
  • Füllgrabe, C., & Rosen, S. (2016b). On the (un) importance of working memory in speech-in-noise processing for listeners with normal hearing thresholds. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1268.
  • Gordon-Salant, S., Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2011). Auditory temporal processing and aging: Implications for speech understanding of older people. Audiology Research, 1, e4–15.
  • Hagerman, B. (1982). Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scandinavian Audiology, 11(2), 79–87.
  • Heinrich, A., & Knight, S. (2016). Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 894, 37–45.
  • Helfer, K. S., & Vargo, M. (2009). Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20(4), 264–271.
  • Houtgast, T., & Festen, J. M. (2008). On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual’s elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise. International Journal of Audiology, 47, 287–295.
  • Huang, Q., & Tang, J. (2010). Age-related hearing loss or presbycusis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 267, 1179–1191.
  • Humes, L. E. (1991). Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2, 59–69.
  • Humes, L. E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 161–167.
  • Humes, L. E. (2007). The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 590–603.
  • Hwang, J., Kim, K., & Lee, J. (2017). Factors affecting sentence-in-noise recognition for normal hearing listeners and listeners with hearing loss. Journal of Audiology and Otology, 21, 81–87.
  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.
  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. J Exp Psychol Gen, 133, 189–217.
  • Kaufman, A. S., McLean, J. E., & Reynolds, C. R. (1988). Sex, race, residence, region, and education differences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(2), 231–248.
  • Kaur, A., & Kumar, R. (2015). Comparative analysis of parametric and NonParametric tests. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, 6, 336–342.
  • Lee, S. J., Park, K. W., Kim, L. S., & Kim, H. H. (2016). Effects of noise level and cognitive function on speech perception in normal elderly and elderly with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 29, 68–77.
  • Mishra, S., Lunner, T., Stenfelt, S., Rönnberg, J., & Rudner, M. (2013). Seeing the talker’s face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 1–12.
  • Na, W., Kim, G., Kim, G., Han, W., & Kim, J. (2017). Effects of hearing loss on speech recognition under distracting conditions and working memory in the elderly. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 12, 1175–1181.
  • Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593–608.
  • Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Singh, G. (2006). Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification, 10, 29–59.
  • Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: Some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception. Ear and Hearing, 21(1), 70–78.
  • Pisoni, D. B., Conway, C. M., Kronenberger, W., Horn, D. L., Karpicke, J., & Henning, S. (2008). Efficacy and effectiveness of cochlear implants in deaf children. In M. Marschark, & P. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 52–101). New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
  • Pisoni, D. B., Kronenberger, W. G., Chandramouli, S. H., & Conway, C. M. (2016). Learning and memory processes following cochlear implantation: The missing piece of the puzzle. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 493.
  • Plomp, R. (1986). A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speechreception threshold of the hearing impaired. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 29, 146–154.
  • Profant, O., Jilek, M., Bures, Z., Vencovsky, V., Kucharova, D., Svobodova, V., … Syka, J. (2019). Functional Age-related changes within the human auditory system studied by audiometric examination. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 11, 26.
  • Rönnberg, J. (2003). Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 68–76.
  • Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., & Lunner, T. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S99–S105.
  • Shechter Shvartzman, L., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2022). Speech perception in older adults: An interplay of hearing, cognition, and learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 480.
  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066.
  • Vercammen, C., Goossens, T., Wouters, J., & Wieringen, A. (2016). How age affects memory task performance in clinically normal hearing persons. Agıng, Neuropsychology, and Cognıtıon, 24, 264–280.
  • Wagener, K. C., Brand, T., & Kollmeier, B. (2013). Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 3039–3056.
  • Wingfield, A., & Tun, P. A. (2007). Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 548–558.
  • Young, J. C., Sawyer, R. J., Roper, B. L., & Baughman, B. C. (2012). Expansion and re-examination of digit span effort indices on the WAIS-IV. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 147–159.
  • Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, A. A., Angersten, W., & Deuster, D. (2010). Communication disorders in the elderly. Audiological Medicine, 8, 184–190.
  • Zokoll, M. A., Fidan, D., Türkyılmaz, D., Hochmuth, S., Ergenç, İ, Sennaroğlu, G., & Kollmeier, B. (2015). Development and evaluation of the turkish matrix sentence test. International Journal of Audiology, 54, 51–61.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.