Film as Architectural Theory

References

• Abram, Simone, and Sarah Pink (eds.). 2015. Media, Anthropology and Public Engagement. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Stan. 2000. Practice: Architecture, Technique and Representation. Amsterdam: G&B Arts International.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, Nora M. 2003. “Memory Essays.” In Stuff it: The Video Essay in the Digital Age, edited by Ursual Biemann, 12–23. Zurich: Edition Voldemeer.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, Nora M. 2007. “Translating the Essay into Film and Installation.” Journal of Visual Culture, 6, no. 1: 44–57.10.1177/1470412907075068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, Marcus, and Jay Ruby (eds.). 2011. Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland 1993. “The Death of the Author.” In Text, new ed, edited by Roland Barthes and Image Music. Illinois: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, Tara, and Janet Harbord. 2008. “Typewriters, Cameras and Love affairs: The Fateful Haunting of Margaret Mead.” Journal of Media Practice, 9, no. 3: 215–227.10.1386/jmpr.9.3.215_1
   Google Scholar
• Carpo, Mario. 2001. Architecture in the Age of Printing: Orality, Writing, Typography, and Printed Images in the History of Architectural Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castle, Helen. 2009. “Editorial,” ‘Theoretical Meltdowns.” Architectural Design, 79, no. 6: 4–5.10.1002/ad.v79:6
   Google Scholar
• Chee, L. 2013. “Domesticity + Home: Reframing Narratives, Reforming Boundaries.” In Home + Bound: Narratives of Domesticity in Singapore and Beyond, edited by L. Chee and M. S.-M. P. Park. Singapore: Center for the Advanced Studies in Architecture, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Chee, L. 2013. “The Public Private Interior: Constructing the Modern Domestic Interior in Singapore’s Public Housing.” In The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design, edited by G. Brooker and L. Weinthal, 199–212. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, Timothy. 2011. The Essay Film: From Montaigne, After Marker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glowczewski, Barbara. 2005. “Lines and Criss-Crossings: Hyperlinks in Australian Indigenous Narratives.” Media International Australia, 116: 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hight, Christopher. 2009. “Meeting the New Boss: After the Death of Theory.” Architectural Design, 79, no. 1: 40–45.10.1002/ad.808
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Stephen Putnam. 2011. “Anthropology and the Problem of Audience Reception.” In Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, edited by Marcus Banks and Jay Ruby, 288–312. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keiller, Patrick. 1999. Robinson in Space. London: BBC Printers Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Keiller, Patrick. 2012. The Possibility of Life’s Survival on the Planet. London: Tate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keiller, Patrick. 2014. The View from the Train: Cities and Other Landscapes. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Koeck, Richard, and Les Roberts (eds.). 2010. The City and the Moving Image: Urban Projections. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koeck, Richard. 2012. Cine-scapes: Cinematic Spaces in Architecture and Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, David. 2006. The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E., and James Clifford. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, Margaret with Ken Heyman. 1975. World Enough: Rethinking the Future. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mecchia, Giuseppina. 2008. “The Future of the Image,” symploke, 16, nos. 1-2: 313-316.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 1995. Picture Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Bill. 2010. Introduction to Documentary. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, Juhani. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: Wiley-Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. [2001] 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857025029
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2011. “Digital Visual Anthropology: Potential and Challenges.” In Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, edited by Marcus Banks and Jay Ruby, 209–233. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2015. “Approaching Media through the Senses: Between Experience and Representation.” Media International Australia 154. Available online: http://www.uq.edu.au/mia/2015-issues#154
   Google Scholar
• Puglisi Luigi Prestinenza. 2009. “Anything Goes,” Architectural Design, 79, no.1: 6-12.10.1002/ad.798
   Google Scholar
• Ramey, Kathryn. 2011. “Productive Dissonance and Sensuous Image-Making: Visual Anthropology and Experimental Film.” In Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, edited by Marcus Banks and Jay Ruby, 256–287. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2007. The Future of the Image, edited and translated by Gregory Elliot 2007. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rascaroli, Laura. 2009. The Personal Camera: Subjective Cinema and the Essay Film. New York: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Hans. 1992 [1940] “Der Filmessay: Eine neue Form des Dokumentarfilms” [The Film Essay: A New Form of Documentary Film]. In Christa Blümlinger and Constantin Wulff, Schreiben Bilder Sprechen: Texte zum essayistischen Film, 195–198. Vienna: Sonderzahl [24 April 1940].
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies: an Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Catherine. 1999. Experimental Ethnography: The Work of Film in the Age of Video. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salt, Barry. 2009. Film Style, Technology, History and Analysis 3rd ed. London: Starwood.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Arnd, and Pasqualino, Caterina (eds.). 2014. Experimental Film and Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar