Celebrating the Collective: Reflections on Gender, Diversity, the Visual, and an Attempt to Capture a Communal Portrait of the Architecture Profession in Australia

References

• Adams, Annmarie, and Peta Tancred. 2000. Designing Women Gender and the Architectural Profession. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. “Looks Philosophical: This is What a Philosopher Looks Like.” Available online: http://looksphilosophical.tumblr.com/
   Google Scholar
• Agrest, Diana I., Leslie Kanes Weisman and Patricia Conway. 1996. The Sex of Architecture. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Howard. 2002. “Visual Evidence: A Seventh Man, the Specified Generalization, and the Work of the Reader.” Visual Studies, 17: 3–11. Doi:10.1080/14725860220137327
   Google Scholar
• Blossfeldt, Karl. 1929. Art Forms in Nature. E. Weyhe.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, Norman. 1999–2000. “The Family Firm: Andreas Gursky and German Photography.” Art and Text 67 (November–January).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Christopher, curator. 2009. Portraits and Architecture. National Portrait Gallery of Australia, Canberra, September 11–November 15. Available online: http://www.portrait.gov.au/exhibitions/portraits-architecture-2009
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Christopher. 2009. “Thinking about Architecture and Portraiture: Dr Christopher Chapman describes the Experimental Exhibition Portraits + Architecture.” September 1. National Portrait Gallery. Available online: http://www.portrait.gov.au/magazines/33/thinking-about-architecture-and-portraiture
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Debra, Elizabeth Danze, and Carol Henderson, eds. 1996. Architecture and Feminism: Yale Publications on Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuff, Dana. 1992. Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Duve, Thierry. 1999. “Bernd and Hilla Becher or Monumentary Photography.” In Bernd and Hilla Becher: Basic Forms, 7–22. Berlin: Schirmer Art Books.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, Joanne, and A. Rocamora. 2006. “The Field of Fashion Materialized: A Study of London Fashion Week.” Sociology – Journal of the British Sociological Association 40, no. 4: 735–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, Bridget, and Fiona Wilson. 2004. “Women Architects and Their Discontents.” Sociology 38, no. 1: 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Freestone, Robert, and Bronwyn Hanna. 2008. Florence Taylor’s Hats: Designing, Building and Editing Sydney. Sydney: Halstead.
   Google Scholar
• de Graft Johnson, Ann, Sandra Manley, and Clara Greed. 2003. Why Do Women Leave Architecture? London: Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) and University of West England.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, Bronwyn. 2002. “Australia’s Early Women Architects: Milestones and Achievements.” Fabrications 12, no. 1: 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Francesca. 1996 The Architect: Reconstructing Her Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Susanne. 2005. “History of Style – Industrial Buildings: The Photographs of Bernd and Hilla Becher.” in Bernd and Hilla Becher: Basic Forms of Industrial Buildings. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Lingwood, James. 2002. “The Weight of Time.” In Field Trips: Bernd and Hilla Becher, Robert Smithson, 70–75. Porto: Museu de Arte Contemporânea de Serralves.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, Michael. 1999. “Architecture, Industry and Photography: Excavating German Identity.” In Reconstructing Space: Architecture in Recent German Photography, edited by Michael Mack, 8–9. London: Architectural Association.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuzaki, Eva, Patricia Gibb, and Imbi Harding. 2003. Consultations & Roundtables on Women in Architecture in Canada. Vancouver: Royal Architectural Institute of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Matthewson, Gill. 2013. “Updating the Numbers, Part 1: At School.” In Parlour: Women, Equity, Architecture, January 29. Available online: http://archiparlour.org/updating-the-numbers-at-school/;
   Google Scholar
• Matthewson, Gill. 2013. “Updating the Numbers, Part 2: At Work.” In Parlour: Women, Equity, Architecture, January 26. Available online: http://archiparlour.org/updating-the-numbers-part-2-at-work/
   Google Scholar
• Matthewson, Gill. 2013. “Updating the Numbers, Part 3: Institute Membership.” In Parlour: Women, Equity, Architecture, February 10. Available online: http://archiparlour.org/updating-the-numbers-part-3-institute-membership/
   Google Scholar
• Matthewson, Gill. 2014. “Women in Architecture: Who Counts?” Architecture Australia 103, no. 5. (November 3). Available online: http://architectureau.com/articles/counting-women/
   Google Scholar
• Matthewson, Gill. 2016. “Mind the Gap.” In Parlour: Women, Equity, Architecture, March 16. Available online: http://archiparlour.org/mind-the-gap/
   Google Scholar
• Rau, Cordula, ed. 2009. Why Do Architects Wear Black? Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rendell, Jane, Barbara Penner, and Iain Borden, eds. 1999. Gender, Space, Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2007. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saint, Andrew. 1983. The Image of the Architect. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press. Doi:10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w0s
   Google Scholar
• Stead, Naomi. 2008. “Buildings, Photographs, Sculptures: On Medium and Disciplinarity in the Work of the Bechers.” In Architecture, Disciplinarity and Art, edited by Andrew Leach and John Macarthur, 135–149. Ghent: A & S Books
   Google Scholar
• Stratigakos, Despina. 2016. Where Are the Women Architects? New York: Princeton University Press. Doi:10.1515/9781400880294
   Google Scholar
• Treadwell, Sarah, and Nicole Allan. 2012. “Limited Visibility: Portraits of Women Architects.” Architectural Theory Review 17, nos. 2–3: 280–298. Doi:10.1080/13264826.2012.736870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troiani, Igea. 2012. “Zaha: An Image of ‘The Woman Architect.’” Architectural Theory Review 17, nos. 2–3: 346–364. Doi:10.1080/13264826.2012.739191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, Paula. 2005. Going Places: The Career Progression of Women in the Architectural Profession. Brisbane: Royal Australian Institute of Architects and Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Allie. n.d. “This is What a Scientist Looks Like: Change the Perception of Who and What a Scientist is or Isn’t.” Available online: http://lookslikescience.tumblr.com/
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Julie. 1997. A Statistical Survey of Registered Women Architects in Australia. Adelaide: Faculty of Art, Architecture and Design, University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Julie. 1998. “Invisible Contributions: The Problem of History and Women Architects.” Architectural Theory Review 3, no. 2: 57–68. Doi:10.1080/13264829809478345
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Julie, and Bronwyn Hanna. 2001. Women Architects in Australia 1900–1950. Canberra: Royal Australian Institute of Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Julie. 2012. “Aptitude and Capacity: Published Views of the Australian Woman Architect.” Architectural Theory Review 17, nos. 2–3: 317–330. Doi:10.1080/13264826.2012.734317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweite, Armin. 2004. “Bernd and Hilla Becher’s ‘Suggestions for a Way of Seeing’: Ten Key Ideas.” In Bernd and Hilla Becher: Typologies, 7–35. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar