291
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Experience and Imagination in Transdisciplinary Design: The FabPod

, , &
Pages 307-328 | Received 28 Jan 2017, Accepted 16 Jun 2018, Published online: 11 Dec 2018

References

  • Akama, Yoko. 2015. “Being Awake to Ma: Designing in Between-ness as a Way of Becoming With.” Co:Design: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 11, nos. 3–4: 262–274.
  • Anderson, Ben. 2009. “Affective Atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society 2: 77–81.
  • Anusas, Mike, and Rachel Harkness. 2016. “Different Presents in the Making,” in Design Anthropological Futures, edited by Rachel Charlotte Smith, Kasper Tang Vangkilde, Mette Gislev Kjaersgaard and Ton Otto, 55–70. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Blesser, Barry, and Linda Ruth Salter. 2007. Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Böhme, Gernot. 1993. “Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics.” Thesis Eleven 36, no. 1: 113–126.
  • Böhme, Gernot. 2013. “The Art of the Stage Set as a Paradigm for an Aesthetics of Atmospheres.” Ambiances: International Journal of Sensory Environment, Architecture and Urban Space, February. Available online: http://journals.openedition.org/ambiances/315.
  • Burry, Jane, Daniel Davis, Brady Peters, Phil Ayres, John Klein Alexander Pena de Leon and Mark Burry. 2011. “Modelling Hyperboloid Sound Scattering: The Challenge of Simulating, Fabricating and Measuring.” In Computational Design Modelling, Proceedings of the Design Modelling Symposium Berlin 2011, edited by Gengnagel et al. Berlin: Springer.
  • Carlin, David, Yoko Akama, Sarah Pink, Adrian Miles, Kyla Brettle, Annie Fergusson, Brigid Magner, Alvin Pang, Francesca Rendle-Short and Shanti Sumartojo. 2015. “Essaying the FabPod: An Improvised Experimental Collaborative Account of the Uncertain Cultural Life and Futures of the Fabpod, as of August 21, 2014.” Axon 5, no. 1. Available online: http://www.axonjournal.com.au/issue-8-1/essaying-fabpod/.
  • Carlin, David, Yoko Akama, Sarah Pink and Shanti Sumartojo. 2018. “Uncertainty as Technology for Moving Beyond.” In Uncertainty and Possibility: New Approaches to Future Making in Design Anthropology, edited by Yoko Akama, Sarah Pink and Shanti Sumartojo, 103–124. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Casey, Edward. 1997. “How to Get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time: Phenomenological Prolegomena.” In Senses of Place, edited by Steven Feld and Keith Basso, 13–52. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
  • Crapanzano, Vincent. 2004. Imaginative Horizons. London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Downton, Peter. 2003. Design Research. Melbourne: RMIT Press.
  • Feld, Steven 2005. “Places Sensed, Senses Placed: Towards a Sensuous Epistemology of Environments.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensory Culture Reader, edited by David Howes. Oxford: Berg.
  • Gaver, Willam, Andy Boucher, Sarah Pennington and Brendan Walker. 2004. “Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty.” Interactions, 11, no. 5: 53–56.
  • Halse, Joachim. 2013. “Ethnographies of the Possible.” In Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, edited by Wendy Gunn, Ton Otto and Rachel Charlotte Smith, 180–196. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Halse, Joachim, and Laura Boffi. 2016. “Design Interventions as a Form of Inquiry.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by Rachel Charlotte Smith, Kasper Tang Vangkilde, Mette Gislev Kjaersgaard and Ton Otto, 89–104. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Heylighen, Ann, and Greg Nijs. 2014. “Re-articulating Prevailing Notions of Design: About Designing in the Absence of Sight and Other Alternative Design Realities.” In The Routledge Companion to Design Research, edited by Paul Rodgers and Joyce Yee, 101–113. London: Routledge.
  • Ingold, Timothy. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.
  • Ingold, Timothy. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.
  • Ingold, Timothy. 2012. “Introduction: The Perception of the User–Producer.” In Design and Anthropology, edited by Wendy Gunn and Jared Donovan, 19–33. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Ingold, Timothy. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
  • Malnar, Joyce, and Frank Vodvarka. 2004. Sensory Design. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Marchand, Trevor H. 2003. “A Possible Explanation for the Lack of Explanation: Or, ‘Why the Master Builder Can’t Explain What He Knows:’ Introducing the Information Atomism against a ‘Definitional’ Definition of Concepts.” In Negotiating Local Knowledge, edited by Johan Pottier, Alan Bicker and Paul Sillitoe, 30–50. London: Pluto.
  • Marchand, Trevor H. 2010. “Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relation between Minds, Bodies, and Environment.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16: S1–S21.
  • Marchand, Trevor H. 2015. “Place-Making in the ‘Holy of Holies:’ The Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem.” In Ritual, Performance and the Senses, edited by Jon Mitchell and Michael Bull, 63–84. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Pallasmaa, Juhani. 1994. “Identity, Intimacy and Domicile: Notes on the Phenomenology of Home.” Arkkitehti – Finnish Architectural Review 1. Available online: http://www.uiah.fi/studies/history2/eident.htm (accessed August 15, 2015).
  • Pallasmaa, Juhani. 2014. “Empathic Imagination: Formal and Experiential Projection.” Architectural Design 84: 80–85.
  • Peters, Brady, Jane Burry, Nicholas Williams and Daniel Davis. 2013. “HubPod: Developing Design Strategies around Acoustic Simulation.” In 2013 Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, edited by Liam O’Brien, Burak Gunay and Azam Khan, 213–220. San Diego, CA: SimAUD.
  • Pink, Sarah. 2015. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.
  • Pink, Sarah, Andrew Dainty, and Dylan Tutt, eds. 2013. Ethnographic Research in the Construction Industry. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Pink, Sarah, and Kerstin Leder Mackley. 2012. “Video as a Route to Sensing Invisible Energy.” Sociological Research Online. Available online: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/3.html/.
  • Pink, Sarah, and Kerstin Leder Mackley. 2016. “Moving, Making and Atmosphere: Routines of Home as Sites for Mundane Improvisation,” Mobilities 11, no. 2: 171–187.
  • Qiu, Xiaojun, Eva Cheng, Ian Burnett, Nicholas Williams, Jane Burry and Mark, Burry. 2015. “Preliminary Study on the Speech Privacy Performance of the Fabpod.” In Acoustics 2015. Hunter Valley: Australian Acoustical Society. Available online: https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/AAS2015/papers/p114.pdf/.
  • Rice, Tom. 2005. “Getting a Sense of Listening.” Critique of Anthropology 25, no. 2: 199–206.
  • Rice, Tom. 2008. “‘Beautiful Murmurs:’ Stethoscopic Listening and Acoustic Objectification.” Senses and Society 3, no. 3: 293–306.
  • RMIT University, Spatial Information Architecture Laboratory. n.d. “Fab Pod.” Available online: http://www.sial.rmit.edu.au/portfolio/fabpod-sial/ (accessed August 20, 2017).
  • Rust, Chris, Judith Mottram and Jeremy Till. 2007. Research Review, Practice-Led Research in Art, Design and Architecture. London: Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC).
  • Sneath, David, Martin Holbraad and M. Axel Pedersen. 2009. “Technologies of the Imagination: An Introduction.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 74, no. 1: 5–30.
  • Sumartojo, Shanti. 2014. “Dazzling Relief: Floodlighting and National Affective Atmospheres on VE Day 1945.” Journal of Historical Geography 45: 59–69.
  • Williams, Nicholas, Daniel Davis, Brady Peters, Alexander Pena de Leon, Jane Burry and Mark Burry. 2013. “FabPod: An Open Design-to-Fabrication System.” In Open Systems: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, edited by Rudi Stouffs, Patrick Janssen, Stanislav Roudavski and Bige Tunçer, 251–260. Singapore: CAADRIA.
  • Zhao, Sipei, Xiaojun Qiu, Eva Cheng, Ian Burnett, Nicholas Williams, Jane Burry and Mark Burry. 2015. “Sound Quality Inside Small Meeting Rooms with Different Room Shape and Fine Structures.” Applied Acoustics 93: 65–74.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.