Data-Driven Processes in Participatory Urbanism: The “Smartness” of Historical Cities

References

• Algaze, G. 2008. Ancient Mesopotamia at the Dawn of Civilization: The Evolution of an Urban Landscape. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2008. “Collective Culture and Urban Public Space.” City 12, no. 1: 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasiu, I. 2019. “Unpacking the Smart City Through the Lens of the Right to the City: A Taxonomy as a Way Forward in Participatory City-Making.” In The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, edited by M. de Lange and M. de Waal, 239–260. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Artopoulos, G., ed. 2018. Hybrid Heritagescapes as Urban Commons in Mediterranean Cities: Essays on Accessing the Deep-Rooted Spatial Interfaces of Cities. Nicosia: The Cyprus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Artopoulos, G., and P. Charalambous. 2018. “Crowd Simulation for Virtual Environments in Urban Modeling.” In Smartness e Healthiness per la transizione verso la resilienza. Orizzonti di ricerca interdisciplinare sulla città e il territorio, BETHA – Built Environment Technologies and Healthy Architectures Series, Architettura e Innovazione, 86.1.4. IT, edited by F. Angelucci, 289–306. Milan: FrancoAngeli Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Artopoulos, G., K. Synnes, A. Bahillo, C. Smaniotto Costa, and N. Rebernik. 2018. “Use of Data Analytics for Enriching Public Spaces with Unique Experiences of Localised Cultural Heritage Content.” In Kultur and Informatik: Hybrid Systems, edited by Carsten Busch, Chrisitan Kassung and Jürgen Sieck, 99–112. Glückstadt: VWG.
   Google Scholar
• Aurigi, A. 2017. “Space is not a Platform – Foregrounding Place in Smart Urban Design.” In Enhancing Places through Technology, edited by A. Zammit and T. Kenna, 7–17. Lisbon: Lusófona University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2013. “Big Data, Smart Cities And City Planning.” Dialogues in Human Geography 3, no. 3: 274–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batty, M., and M. Longley. 1994. Fractal Cities – A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. 1966. Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bennoune, K. “Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights on her mission to Cyprus,” 12 (2017). http://spinternet.ohchr.org/_Layouts/SpecialProceduresInternet/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A/HRC/34/56/add.1&Lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A. 2013. “The Origins Of Scaling In Cities.” Science 340, no. 6139: 1438–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., J. Lobo, D. Helbing, C. Kuhnert, and G. B. West. 2007. “Growth, Innovation, Scaling, and the Pace of Life in Cities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 7301–7306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, R. 2012. “Attack On Townscapes: The Role of Heritage in Protecting Common Grounds.” In Common Ground: A Critical Reader: Venice Biennale of Architecture 2012, edited by D. Chipperfield, 219–232. Venice: Marsilio.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, C. 1996. CyberCities: Visual Perception in the Age of Electronic Communication. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brynskov, M. 2019. “Epilogue: Co-creating a Humane Digital Transformation of Cities.” In The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, edited by M. de Lange and M. de Waal, 299–302. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• C3PLACES, The C3PLACES Project (2018). c3places.eu
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, F, K. Kloeckl, and C. Ratti. 2009. “WikiCity: Real-Time Location-Sensitive Tools for the City.” In Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, Information Science Reference, edited by M. Foth, 390–413 Hershey, PA: ICIGlobal.
   Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P. and R. Kitchin. 2018a. “Being a ‘Citizen’ in the Smart City: Up and Down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation in Dublin, Ireland.” GeoJournal 84, no. 1: 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P. and R. Kitchin. 2018b. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of 'Citizen-Focused' Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space October :5. Available online: doi: 10.1177/0263774X18806508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S., M. Francis, L. G. Rivlin, and A. M. Stone. 1992. Public Space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., T. Heath, S. Tiesdell, and T. Oc. 2003. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Michigan Architectural Press. Available online: Doi:10.1111/febs.12167.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley R, S. Joss, and Y. Dayot. 2017. “The Smart City and its Publics: Insights From Across Six UK Cities.” Urban Research & Practice 11, no. 1: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christaller, W. 1966. Central Places in Southern Germany. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Culture21, European Economic and Social Committee, “Visits and Publications” Unit, Culture, Cities and Identity in Europe (2016), https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/qe-01-16-463-en-n.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cyberparks, The Cyberparks project (2014). http://cyberparks-project.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Cyberparks, Monitoring Tool Cyberparks (2016). http://cyberparks-project.eu/app/monitoring-tool.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, M. 2015. “The Playful City: Using Play and Games to Foster Citizen Participation.” In Social Technologies and Collective Intelligence, edited by A. Skaržauskienė, 426–434. Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, M. 2015a. “The Playful City: Play and Games for Citizen Participation in The Smart City.” Scientific Report. http://cyberparks-project.eu/stsm.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, Michiel and Martijn de Waal. 2013. “Owning the City: New Media and Citizen Engagement in Urban Design.” First Monday 18, no. 11: 89–109. https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4954/3786 (accessed 16 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• De Souza e Silva, A. and J. Frith. 2012. Mobile Interfaces in Public Spaces: Locational Privacy, Control, and Urban Sociability. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dezuanni, M., M. Foth, K. Kerry Mallan, H. Hughes, eds. 2018. Digital Participation through Social Living Labs – Valuing Local Knowledge, Enhancing Engagement. Cambridge, UK: Chandos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dike, A. 2018. “Would You Trust An Artificially-Intelligent Expert?” The National Law Review (online). https://www.natlawreview.com/article/would-you-trust-artificially-intelligent-expert. (accessed 12 November 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, T., C. Smaniotto Costa, D. Mateus, M. Menezes, and A. Bahillo. 2015. “Pervasive Open Public Spaces – The Amalgamation of Information and Communication Technologies into Open Public Spaces.” In Projects for an Inclusive City. Social Integration through Urban Growth strategies, edited by O. Marina and A. Armando, 212–225. Skopje: City of Skopje.
   Google Scholar
• EMPATIA project, Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, Lisboa Participa (2018). https://www.lisboaparticipa.pt/css/general.css
   Google Scholar
• ESRI, “Smart Communities & Smart Cities” (2018). http://www.esri.com/en-us/smart-communities/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, RTD open access (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Felsen, M., B. Watson, and U. Wilensky. 2006. “Urban Complexity + Emergence: Procedural Modelling of City Activity and Form.” In Surfacing Urbanisms: Recent Approaches to Metropolitan Design, 261–265. Pasadena, CA: Woodbury University.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, M. 2018. “Participatory Urban Informatics: Towards Citizen-ability.” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 7, no. 1: 4–19. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-10-2017-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth, M. 2017. “Lessons from Urban Guerrilla Placemaking for Smart City Commons.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities & Technologies (C&T 2017), Troyes, France, 32–35. New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3083671.3083707
   Google Scholar
• Government Digital Service, “Chancellor to unlock hidden value of government data” (2017). https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-to-unlock-hidden-value-of-government-data
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2005. “Software-Sorted Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 29, no. 5: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 2004. Dark Age Ahead. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Klinenberg, E. 2003. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzaretti, Luciana. 2012. “The Resurge of the “Societal Function of Cultural Heritage. An Introduction.” City, Culture and Society 3, no. 4: 229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H. and M. Batty, 2009. Virtual Geographic Environments. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. 2017. “A City Is Not a Computer.” Places Journal. Available online: doi: 10.22269/170207, accessed 16 Feb 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, E., 2011. Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende's Chile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Middel, A., S. Guhathakurta, H. Hagen, P. Olech, and F. Höpel. 2009. “Visualizing Future 3-Dimensional Neighborhoods in Phoenix: An Application Incorporating Empirical Methods with Computational Graphics.” In Virtual Geographic Environments, edited by H. Lin and M. Batty. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, J., C. Zimring, and Y.K. Choi. 1990. “Finding the Building in Wayfinding.” Environment and Behavior 22: 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PPS – Project for Public Spaces. 2018. www.pps.org/category/placemaking.
   Google Scholar
• Regian, J.W., Shebilske, W.L., and Monk, J.M. 1992. “Virtual Reality: An Instructional Medium for Visual-Spatial Tasks.” Journal of Communication 42, no. 4: 136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R., M. Rittenbruch, M. Foth, D. Filonik, and S. Viller. 2012. “Street Computing: Towards an Integrated Open Data API for Cities.” Journal of Urban Technology 19, no. 2: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2012.698064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaftoe, H. 2008. Convivial Urban Spaces: Creating Effective Public Places. London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Smaniotto Costa, C., Artopoulos, G. & Djukic, A. 2018. “Reframing Digital Practices in Mediated Public Open Spaces Associated with Cultural Heritage.” Journal of Communication and Languages 48, no. 2: 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Smaniotto Costa, C., I. Almeida, J. Batista, and Menezes, M. 2018. “Envolver adolescentes no pensar a cidade: reflexão sobre oficinas temáticas de urbanismo no Bairro de Alvalade, Lisboa.” Revista de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território (GOT) no. 15: 117–142. Available online: doi: 10.17127/got/2018.15.006
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi, Ayyoob, “Creating Smart Sustainable Cities: Challenges and Opportunities”, (18 May 2018), Future Earth Network. http://www.futureearth.org/
   Google Scholar
• Smaniotto Costa, C. and K. Ioannidis, eds. 2017. The Making of the Mediated Public Space – Essays on Emerging Urban Phenomena. Lisbon: Edições Universitárias Lusófona.
   Google Scholar
• Smaniotto Costa, C., A. B. Martínez, F.J. Álvarez, I. Šuklje-Erjavec, M. Menezes, and M. Pallares-Barbera. 2017. “Digital Tools for Capturing User’s Needs on Urban Open Spaces: Drawing Lessons from Cyberparks Project.” In Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City, edited by E. Oliveira, 177–193. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smørdal, O., K. E. Wensaas, S. Lopez-Aparicio, I. N. Pettersen, and K. Hoelscher. 2016. “Key Issues for Enhancing Citizen Participation in Co-Constructing City Futures.” Presented at the Proceedings of Fourth International Workshop on Cultures of Participation in the Digital Age – CoPDA 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden: 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, B. 2018. “Stop Saying ‘Smart Cities.” The Atlantic (online), February 2018. www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/02/stupid-cities/553052/.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpp, E.-M. 2013. “New in Town? On Resilience and “Resilient Cities”.” Cities 32: 164–166. Available online: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275113000048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, K. 2011. Video Games and Learning: Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age. Technology, Education-Connections (the TEC Series). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. W. 2002. “Urban Open Space in the 21st Century.” Landscape and Urban Planning 60, no. 2: 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens P., and O'Sullivan D. 2001. “Cellular Automata and Urban Simulation: Where Do We Go From Here?” Environment & Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 163–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, Anthony M. 2013. Smart Cities: Big data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2015. Global Public Space Toolkit. https://unhabitat.org/books/global-public-space-toolkit-from-global-principles-to-local-policies-and-practice.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, B., P. Muller, P. Wonka, and Gross, M. 2009. “Interactive Geometric Simulation of 4D Cities.” Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 28, no. 2: 481–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P., and C. Landry. 2008. The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• The World Economic Forum, “World Economic Forum Mobile Financial Services Development Report” (2012). www.weforum.org\mfs
   Google Scholar