Smart as a Global Vision? Exploring Smart in Local District Development Projects

References

• Berkhout, F. 2006. “Nvftems Innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, nos 3–4: 299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainport Smart District. 2018. “Plan van Aanpak Brainport Smart District Deel A.” Helmond.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, R. 2018. “Veel meer woningen in ‘slimme wijk’ in Brandevoort.” Eindhovens Dagblad, February 9.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., E. Laclau, S. Zizek, and S. Žižek. 2000. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, L., K. Grooten, de Klein , and S. Puranik. 2017. “Brainport Smart District: A Step Towards Future Cities.” P.D.Eng. trainee report, Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2007. “What Does it Mean to Say That Economics is Performative.” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. A. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 311–57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CCC. 2019. UK Housing: Fit for the Future? London: Committee on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Cocchia, A. 2014. “Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review.” In Smart City, 13–43. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2015. “New Urban Utopias of Postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial Urbanization’ in Dholera Smart City, Gujarat.” Dialogues in Human Geography 5, no. 1: 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffke, U, Hunziker, C, Löwer, C, Niemeyer, T., and Strunk, P. 2016. Vision 2030. Schöneweide.com. Berlin: WISTA Management GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Dignum, M. 2013. The Power of Large Technological Visions. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M., W. Mcdowall, M. Hodson, and S. Marvin. 2006. “Negotiating Contested Visions and Place-Specific Expectations of the Hydrogen Economy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, nos 3–4: 361–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exner, A., L. Cepoiu, C. Weinzlierl, and V. Asara. 2018. Performing Smartness Differently – Strategic Enactments of a Global Imaginary in Three European Cities. SRE – Discussion Papers 2018/05. Vienna: WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F., and J. J. Deuten. 2006. “Local and Global Dynamics in Technological Development: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective on Knowledge Flows and Lessons from Reinforced Concrete.” Science and Public Policy 33, no. 4: 265–75.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2017. “The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies.” Minerva 55, no. 1: 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., and J. Hillier. 2016. Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., and T. I. Wanvik. 2017. “Carbonscapes and Beyond: Conceptualizing the Instability of Oil Landscapes.” Progress in Human Geography 41, no. 4: 432–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofferberth, M. 2015. “Mapping the Meanings of Global Governance: A Conceptual Reconstruction of a Floating Signifier.” Millennium 43, no. 2: 598–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? Intelligent, Progressive or Entrepreneurial?” City 12, no. 3: 303–20.
   Google Scholar
• Houd Rivierenwijk Leefbaar. 2019. Houdt Rivierenwijk en de omgeving van de buitenproportionele nieuwbouwwijk Merwede LEEFBAAR !!. https://www.leefbaarmerwede.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M., S. Joss, D. Schraven, C. Zhan, and M. Weijnen. 2015. “Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making Sense of a Multitude of Concepts Promoting Sustainable Urbanization.” Journal of Cleaner Production 109: 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2014. “The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism.” GeoJournal 79: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2015. “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 131–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lente, H. 1993. “Promising Technology. The dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments.” PhD thesis, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, L. 2018. “From BIM to CIM: Why Building and City Information Modelling are Essential to the Development of Smart Cities.” BIM News, July 16. https://www.bimcommunity.com/news/load/917/from-bim-to-cim-why-building-and-city-information-modelling-are-essential-to-the-development-of-smart-cities.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., and B. Anderson. 2011. “Thinking with Assemblage.” Area 43, no. 2: 162–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhearson, T., D. M. Iwaniec, and X. Bai. 2017. “Positive Visions for Guiding Urban Transformations Toward Sustainable Futures.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecanoo. 2010. Mecanoo masterplan schleusengärten hamburg bergedorf. Delft: Mecanoo architecten.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. 2018. “Datapolis: A Public Governance Perspective on ‘Smart Cities.’” Perspectives on Public Planning and Governance 1, no. 3: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. 2018. The National BIM Report 2018. London: RIBA Enterprises Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, D., and G. Lloyd. 2005. “City-Visions: Visioning and Delivering Scotland's Economic Future.” Local Economy 20, no. 1: 40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. 2006. “Agencement/Assemblage.” Theory Culture and Society 23, no. 2/3: 108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., M. Zook, and A. Wiig. 2015. “The 'Actually Existing Smart City'.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, R. 2000. “The Origin and Development of Vision and Visioning in Planning.” International Planning Studies 5, no. 2: 225–36.
   Google Scholar
• Slimcity. 2017. Over SlimCity. www.slimcity.nl/over.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions.” Research Policy 34, no. 10: 1491–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher (2010). “‘Energy Regions’: The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures.” Research Policy 39, no. 4: 449–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. M. 2016. “Anticipatory Logics of the Smart City’s Global Imaginary.” Urban Geography 37, no. 4: 572–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiek, A., and D. Iwaniec. 2014. “Quality Criteria for Visions and Visioning in Sustainability Science.” Sustainability Science 9, no. 4: 497–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W., and Barton, C. 2018. Tackling the Under-Supply of Housing in England. Briefing Paper Number 07671, December 12. London: House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar