TAKING NOTE: Annotated Portfolio as a Method to Analyse the Experience of Design Research Practice

References

• Bonner, A. and Tolhurst, G. 2002. “Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation”, Nurse researcher, 9(4), pp. 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. 2012. ‘The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of “research through design”‘, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. G. 1984. In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J. 1957. “Photography in Anthropology: A Report on Two Experiments,” American Anthropologist, 59(5): 843–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2007. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. 2001. Interpretive Interactionism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• EMF. 2017. A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future. London: Ellen Macarthur Foundation and Circular Fibres Initiative. Available online at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/\assets/downloads/publications/A-New-Textiles-Economy_Full-Report.pdf (Accessed: 3 January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B. and Bowers, J. 2012. “Annotated portfolios,” Interactions, 19(4): 40.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. 2012. “What should we expect from research through design?”, in Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘12. the 2012 ACM annual conference, Austin, TX, USA: ACM Press, p. 937.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, N. C. 1950. Shoddy and Mungo Manufacture: Its Development, Ancillary Processes Methods and Machinery. 1st edition. Manchester: Emmott.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. and Earley, R. 2019. “Divide, Switch, Blend: exploring two hats for industry entrepreneurship and academic practice-based textile design research,” The Design Journal, 22(sup1), pp. 19–35. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. 2018. ‘MIXING IT UP IN PRATO: identifying innovation hotspots within mechanical textile recycling’, in Global Fashion Conference. What’s Going On? A discourse on Fashion, Design and Sustainability, London: GFC. Available online at: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/eb22a2_4a7b43538fbf45a7bc753a8a8bfb6aad.pdf (Accessed: 31 May 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. 2014. “Point-and-Shoot Memories: The Influence of Taking Photos on Memory for a Museum Tour,” Psychological Science, 25(2): 396–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt-Taylor, J. 2002. “Inside knowledge: issues in insider research”, Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987, 16(46), pp. 33–35. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.07.16.46.33.c3239.
   Google Scholar
• Hobye, M., Padfield, N. and Löwgren, J. 2013. “Designing Social Play Through Interpersonal Touch: An Annotated Portfolio”, in Nordic Design Research Conference proceedings. Nordic Design Research Conference 2013, Copenhagen-Malmö. Available online at: http://muep.mau.se/bitstream/handle/2043/15811/hobye_etal_nordes_2013.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (Accessed: 5 December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, L. and Ledington, P. 2004. “The Engagement Approach to Real-World Problem Solving: Toward a Coherent Soft-Systems-Based Theoretical Platform for Real-World Problem Solving,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(5): 497–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoe, E. 2013. In Textasis : Matrixial narratives of textile design. Ph.D. Thesis. Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Kelliher, A. and Byrne, D. 2015. “Design futures in action: Documenting experiential futures for participatory audiences,” Futures, 70: 36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 2015. Experiential Learning: experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., et al. 2011. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Science & Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, J. 2013. “Annotated Portfolios and Other Forms of Intermediate-level Knowledge,” Interactions, 20(1): 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., Srivastava, S. and Børsting, J. [no date] ‘Annotated portfolios as process narratives’. University of Oslo. Available online at: https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF5591/h15/9591_paper.pdf (Accessed: 8 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E. R. G., Earley, R. and Andersen, K. R. 2019. “From singular to plural: exploring organisational complexities and circular business model design,” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(3): 308–326.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerwein, M., Bakker, C. and Balkenende, R. 2018. ‘Annotated Portfolios as a Method to Analyse Interviews’, in DRS2018. Catalyst for Change, Scribd: University of Limerick, pp. 1148–1158. Available online at: https://www.scribd.com/document/382349704/DRS2018-Vol-3#download (Accessed: 24 July 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: how Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S. and Culén, A. L. 2017. ‘DESIGNING FOR THE SECOND-HAND USE OF CONSUMER GOODS’, in Proceedings of the International Conference Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction, pp. 193–206. Available online at: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/56753/secondHand-Final-%20IHCI.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed: 5 December 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. R. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd edition. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press USA.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, R. and Solomon, N. 1999. “Experiential learning and the shaping of subjectivity in the workplace,” Studies in the Education of Adults, 31(2): 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C. (2008). Visual Thinking for Design. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann (Morgan Kaufmann series in interactive technologies).
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. and Forlizzi, J. 2014. ‘Research Through Design in HCI’, in Olson, J. S. and Kellogg, W. A. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 167–189. New York: Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. 2007. ‘Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ‘07. the SIGCHI conference, San Jose, CA: ACM Press, p. 493.
   Google Scholar