Many Makers: Collaborative Renewal of Chahta Nan Tvnna (Choctaw Textiles)

References

• Adair, J. 1775. The History of the American Indians. London: Edward & Charles Dilly.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, D. 2011. “Removing the Heart of the Choctaw People: Indian Removal from a Native Perspective.” In S.A. Miller and J. Riding (ed.) Native Historians Write Back: Decolonizing American Indian History, pp. 105–138. Lubbock: Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• American Indian Archaeological Institute. 1982. “Claude Medford, Jr.: Choctaw Basketmaker,” Artifacts, X(4): 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Atalay, S. 2006. “Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice,” The American Indian Quarterly, 30(3–4): 280–310.
   Google Scholar
• Aulay, S.M. and Waru-Rewiri, K.T. 1996. “Maori Weaving: The Intertwining of Spirit, Action and Metaphor,” Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings, 858.
   Google Scholar
• Byington, C. 1915. A Dictionary of the Choctaw Language. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, J. 2018. “Reawakening Chahta Nan Tvnna (Choctaw Textiles),” Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings, 1076.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, J. 2020. “Member Monday with Jennifer Byram: Continuity During Times of Coronavirus – Bringing Together the Choctaw Textile Community,” Textile Society of America, Blog, August 25, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carocci, M. 2010. “Clad with the ‘Hair of Trees’: A History of Native American Spanish Moss Textile Industries,” Textile History, 41(1): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D.J. and McCallum, R. 2009. “Turuturu: Integrating Indigenous and Western Knowledge,” AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 5(1): 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 2016. “Bison Hair Bag,” Biskinik, June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 2017. “Trial by Fiber: Mulberry Bark,” Biskinik, March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 2018a. “Dyeing for Color.” Biskinik, June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 2018b. “Iti Fabvssa: Piece by Piece: Choctaw Women Quilters.” Biskinik, June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 2019. “The Making of a Skirt,” Biskinik, December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, T.A. 2006. “Cane and Palmetto Basketry of the Choctaw of St. Tammany Parish.” In D.B. Lee and H.F.P. Gregory (ed.) The Work of Tribal Hands: Southeastern Indian Split Cane Basketry, pp. 73–96. Natchitoches, LA: Northwestern State University.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, C. 2016. “Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities,” Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T.J., Lippert, D., Mcguire, R.H., Nicholas, G.R., Watkins, J.E. and Zimmerman, L.J. 2010. “The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology,” American Antiquity, 75(2): 228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drooker, P.B. 1991. “Mississippian Lace: A Complex Textile Impressed on Pottery from the Stone Site, Tennessee,” South, 10(2): 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Drooker, P.B. 1992. Mississippian Village Textiles at Wickliffe. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Drooker, P.B. 2000. “Approaching Fabrics Through Impressions on Pottery,” Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings, 773.
   Google Scholar
• Drooker, P.B. 2003. “Matting and Pliable Fabrics from Bottle Creek.” In I.W. Brown (ed.) Bottle Creek: A Pensacola Culture Site in South Alabama, pp. 180–193. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, E. and Reilly, R.C. 2019. “Special Issue: Making as Method: Reimagining Traditional and Indigenous Notions of ‘Craft’ in Research Practice,” Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 4(1): i–xvi.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. and Keating, R.C. 2001. “Light Microscopy and Determination of Eryngium Yuccifolium Michaux Leaf Material in Twined Slippers from Salts Cave, Kentucky,” Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(1): 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J.H. 1937. “Interview with Mr. Gilbert Thompson,” Tuskahoma, OK: Works Progress Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Henare, A. 2005. “Nga Aho Tipuna (Ancestral Threads): Maori Cloaks from New Zealand.” In S. Küchler and D. Miller (ed.) Clothing as Material Culture. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, E.T. 2010. “The Ties That Bind: Fabric Traditions and Fiber Use in the Ozark Plateau.” PhD Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Jakes, K.A. and Ericksen, A.G. 2001. “Prehistoric Use of Sumac and Bedstraw as Dye Plants in Eastern North America,”Southeastern Archaeology, 20(1): 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerer, R.W. 2013. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
   Google Scholar
• King, M.M., Cain, R. and Cain, S.M. 2019. “An Experimental Ethnoarchaeological Approach to Understanding the Development of Use Wear Associated with the Processing of River Cane for Split-Cane Technology,” Southeastern Archaeology, 38(1): 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Koldehoff, B., Kuttruff, J.T., Butler, B.M. and Standifer, M.S. 2008. “The Kerr Canyon Textile and the Importance of Packrats (Neotoma floridana) in the Eastern Woodlands.” Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 33(2): 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Marzan, H. and Tangarō, T. 2020. “ʻAʻahu Kinolau (Ritual Wear of Transformation), Regalia in Leadership,” Virtual presentation. Hawaiʻi Papa O Ke Ao, University of Hawai’i.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, A. 2015. “Why Categorizing Native Art as ‘Traditional’ and ‘Contemporary’ Is Toxic,” First American Art Magazine, 8:12.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. 2011. “Archaeologists and Indigenous People: A Maturing Relationship?” Annual Review of Anthropology, 40: 363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parezo, N. 2002. “Indigenous Art: Creating Value and Sharing Beauty.” In P.J. Deloria and N. Salisbury (ed.) A Companion to American Indian History, pp. 209–233. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. 1994. “Folk Dyeing with Natural Material in Oklahoma’s Indian Territory,” Material Culture, 26(2): 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.B. 2020. “Women in Focus: Revisiting the Encounters in Frances Densmore’s ‘Choctaw Music,’” Blog. Mississippi Folklife, Fall.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, V.L. 2018. “Nd’awakananawal Babijigwezijik Wd’elasawawôganôl: ‘We Wear the Clothing of Our Ancestors’” Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings, 1111.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, M. 2006. “Mississippian Textiles at Beckum Village (ICK24), Clarke County, Alabama,” Master’s thesis, University of Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Squint, K.L. 2010. “Choctawan Aesthetics, Spirituality, and Gender Relations: An Interview with LeAnne Howe,” MELUS, 35 (3): 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, J.R. 1918. “An Early Account of the Choctaw Indians,” Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, 5: 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, J.R. 1931. Source Material for the Social and Ceremonial Life of the Choctaw Indians. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton, J.R. 1946. Indians of the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. 2014. “Chahta Ilukfi Nan Isht Ikbit [Choctaw Pottery],” The Southern Quarterly, 51(4): 162.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. 2019. Choctaw Food: Remembering the Land, Rekindling Ancient Knowledge. Durant, OK: Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.J. and Jakes, K.A. 2002. “Replication of Textile Dyeing with Suman and Bedstraw,” Southeastern Archaeology, 21(2): 252–256.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.J. 2003. “Textiles as Indicators of Hopewellian Culture Burial Practices,” PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. 2008. “Chahta Intikba Im Aiikhvna (Learning from the Choctaw Ancestors): Integrating Indigenous and Experimental Approaches in the Study of Mississippian Technologies,” PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, E.J., Jakes, K.A. 2006. “An Exploration of Prehistoric Spinning Technology: Spinning Efficiency and Technology Transition,” Archaeometry, 48(2): 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J.E. 2003. “Beyond the Margin: American Indians, First Nations, and Archaeology in North America,” American Antiquity, 68(2): 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2008. Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.R. n.d. “Spinning (Bunny) Tails: An Adventure in Experimental Archaeology,” Illinois Antiquity, 31(3–4).
   Google Scholar
• Wirihana, C.H. 2008. “Kākahu as Cultural Identity,” Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings, 245.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 1880. Chahta Leksikon: A Choctaw in English Definition. For the Choctaw Academies and Schools. St. Louis: Presbyterian Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zedeño, M.N. 2008. “Bundled Worlds: The Roles and Interactions of Complex Objects from the North American Plains,” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15(4): 362–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar