The Impact of Emergency Remote Learning on a Studio Curriculum Analyzed via Case Studies

References

• Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M.C. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, P. and Durling, D. 2000. “Doing the Right Thing—Social Processes in Design Learning,” The Design Journal, 3(2): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Brocato, K. 2009. “Studio Based Learning: Proposing, Critiquing, Iterating Our Way to Person Centeredness for Better Classroom Management,” Theory into Practice, 48(2): 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buldan, E. 2021. “Situated Learning in Online Architectural Studio Education,” Journal of Design Studio, 1: 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Corazzo, J. 2019. “Materializing the Studio. A Systematic Review of the Role of the Material Space of the Studio in Art, Design and Architecture Education,” The Design Journal, 22(1): 1249–1265.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, F., Grifoni, P. and Guzzo, T. 2020. “Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations,” Societies, 10(4): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, K. 2015. “The Democratisation of Design and Design Learning: How Do We Educate the Next-Generation Designer,” International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8(6): 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, I. 2009. “Making and the Teaching Studio,” Journal of Visual Art Practice, 8(3): 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. and Bond, A. 2020. Between Emergency Remote Teaching And Online Learning, March 27. “The Difference,” The Educause Review, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, J.A., Silva, P.A. and Prelath, R. 2020. “Implementing Studio-Based Learning for Design Education: A Study on the Perception and Challenges of Malaysian Undergraduates,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3): 611–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynas, E., Budge, B. and Beale, C. 2013. “Hands on: The Importance of Studio Learning in Design Education,”Visual Inquiry, 2(2): 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Marshalsey, L. and Sclater, M. 2020. “Together but Apart: Creating and Supporting Online Learning Communities in an Era of Distributed Studio Education,” International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(4): 826–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megahed, N. 2018. “Reflections on Studio-Based Learning: Assessment and Critique,” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(1): 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Schools of Art and Design 2020. National Association of Schools of Art and Design Handbook 2020-21. Reston, VA: National Association of Schools of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Shreeve, A., Sims, E. and Trowler, P. 2010. “A Kind of Exchange: Learning from Art and Design Teaching,” Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2): 125–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanWynsberghe, R. and Khan, S. 2007. “Redefining Case Study,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, K. 2007. “A New Approach to Illustration Curriculum Design: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy as The Framework for Cognitive and Psychomotor Illustration Studio Objectives,” (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, Oklahoma.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, T. 2021. “Emergency Remote Studio Teaching: Notes from the Field,” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(1): 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zehner, R., Forsyth, G., Musgrave, E., Neale, D., de la Harpe, B., Peterson, F., Frankham, N., with Wilson, S. and Watson, K. 2009. Curriculum Development in Studio Teaching Volume One, STP Final Report. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar