SensAE – A Tool to Explore Material-Touch-Emotions

References

• Bakar, A.B. 2004. Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Fabric Handle Characteristics. England: University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, J.M., Nocera, C.C. and Bargh, J.A. 2010. “Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions,” Science, 328(5986): 1712–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, G. 2018. Fewer, Better Things: The Hidden Wisdom of Objects. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Balters, S. and Steinert, M. 2017. “Capturing Emotion Reactivity through Physiology Measurement as a Foundation for Affective Engineering in Engineering Design Science and Engineering Practices,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(7): 1585–1607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardalai, R., Laycock, R. and Troynikov, O. 2020. “Material-Touch-Emotion Lexicon Enabling Design for Wellbeing.” In: Y. McLane & J. Pable (eds.), AMPS Proceedings Series 18.2. Experiential Design - Rethinking Relations Between People, Objects and Environments, pp. 124–138. Florida State University, USA, 16 - 17 January. http://architecturemps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/AMPS-Proceedings-18-1-Experiential-Design.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R.L. 2002. “From Fabric Hand to Thermal Comfort: The Evolving Role of Objective Measurements in Explaining Human Comfort Response to Textiles,” International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 14: 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, L.F. and Bliss‐Moreau, E. 2009. “Affect as a Psychological Primitive,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41: 167–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L.F. and Russell, J.A. 1999. “The Structure of Current Affect: Controversies and Emerging Consensus,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1): 10–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L.F. 1998. “Discrete Emotions or Dimensions? The Role of Valence Focus and Arousal Focus,” Cognition & Emotion, 12(4): 579–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D.P. 1996. “Fabrics: Sensory and Mechanical Properties,” Textile Progress, 26(3): 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Shao, F., Barnes, C., Childs, T. and Henson, B. 2009. “Exploring Relationships between Touch Perception and Surface Physical Properties,” International Journal of Design, 3(2): 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesielska-Wrobel, I.L. and Van Langenhove, L. 2012. “The Hand of Textiles–definitions, Achievements, Perspectives–a Review,” Textile Research Journal, 82: 1457–1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranny-Francis, A. 2012a. “Semefulness: Touch, Design and Meaning.” In P. Breedon (ed.) Smart Design, pp. 75–86. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cranny-Francis, A. 2012b. “Semefulness: Touch, Design and Meaning.” In P. Breedon (ed.) Smart Design, pp. 75–85. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. 2015. “The Textility of Emotion: A Study Relating Computational Textile Textural Expression to Emotion.” Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 23–32. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2002. Designing Emotions. The Netherlands: Pieter Desmet.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. and Hekkert, P. 2007. “Framework of Product Experience,” International Journal of Design, 1(1): 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2008. “Product Emotion.” Product Experience, pp. 379–397. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P., Fokkinga, S.F., Ozkaramanli, D. and Yoon, J. 2016. "Emotion-driven Product Design.” Emotion Measurement, pp. 405–426. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, A. 2017. Encountering Surfaces, Encountering Spaces, Encountering Painting. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., Levenson, R.W. and Friesen, W.V. 1983. “Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes among Emotions,” Science, 221(4616): 1208–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. and Friesen, W.V. 1971. “Constants across Cultures in the Face and Emotion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2): 124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. and Oster, H. 1979. “Facial Expressions of Emotion,” Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1): 527–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, T. 2014. Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulkerson, M. 2014. The First Sense: A Philosophical Study of Human Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J.J. 1962. “Observations on Active Touch,” Psychological Review, 69(6): 477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, S., Dessirier, J.M., Mehrabyan, A., McGlone, F., Essick, G., Gescheider, G., Fontana, A., Xiong, R., Ackerley, R. and Blot, K. 2011. “The Development and Validation of Sensory and Emotional Scales of Touch Perception,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73: 531–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, S. and Essick, G.K. 2016. “Psychophysical Assessment of the Sensory and Affective Components of Touch.” Affective Touch and the Neurophysiology of CT Afferents, pp. 129–157. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hertenstein, M.J., Holmes, R., McCullough, M. and Keltner, D. 2009. “The Communication of Emotion via Touch,” Emotion (Washington, DC), 9(4): 566–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A.G. and Siu, K.W.M.G. 2012. “Emotion Design, Emotional Design, Emotionalize Design: A Review on Their Relationships from a New Perspective,” The Design Journal, 15(1): 9–32. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630612X13192035508462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, G. and Frederiks, A.D. 2013. “Towards Tactile Expressions of Emotion through Mediated Touch.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, E. 2010. “The Tacit-turn: Textile Design in Design Research,” Duck Journal for Research in Textiles and Textile Design, 1: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonski, N.G. 2008. Skin: A Natural History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L.A. 2018. Haptics. Essential Knowledge Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karana, E. 2010. “How do Materials Obtain Their Meanings?” METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 27(2): 271–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karana, E., Hekkert, P. and Kandachar, P. 2009. “Meanings of Materials through Sensorial Properties and Manufacturing Processes,” Materials & Design, 30(7): 2778–2784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karana, E., Pedgley, O. and Rognoli, V. 2015. “On Materials Experience,” Design Issues, 31(3): 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, S. 1980. “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation.” 2nd ed. The Hand Evaluation and Standardization Committee. The Textile Machinery Society Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kawabata, S. and Niwa, M. 1991. “Objective Measurement of Fabric Mechanical Property and Quality: Its Application to Textile and Clothing Manufacturing,” International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 3: 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kayseri, G.Ö., Özdil, N. and Mengüç, G.S. 2012. "Sensorial Comfort of Textile Materials.” Woven Fabrics. London: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Kilinc-Balci, F. 2011. Testing, analyzing and predicting the comfort properties of textiles. Improving Comfort in Clothing. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, I. and Robinson, M. 2009. “Measures of Emotion: A Review,” Cognition & Emotion, 23(2): 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802204677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meilgaard, M.C., Carr, B.T. and Civille, G.V. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, E.M., Corcoran, P., O’Regan, G., Keeley, H., Cannon, M., Carli, V., Wasserman, C., Hadlaczky, G., Sarchiapone, M. and Apter, A. 2017. “Physical Activity in European Adolescents and Associations with Anxiety, Depression and Well-being,” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(1): 111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, J. 2010. From Active Touch to Tactile Communication: What’s Tactile Cognition Got to Do with It. Aalborg: Danish Resource Centre on Congenital Deafblindness.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why we Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A., and Ortony, A. 2003. “Designers and Users: Two Perspectives on Emotion and Design.” In: Symposium on Foundations of Interaction Design, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Olivo, P., Del Curto, B., Faucheu, J., Lafon, D., Bassereau, J.-F., Lê, S. and Delafosse, D. 2013. “Sensory Metrology: When Emotions and Experiences Contribute to Design.” DS 75-7: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 7. Human Behaviour in Design, Seoul, Korea, 19–22.08. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, E. and VanPatter, G.K. 2011. “NextDesign Geographies, Understanding Design Thinking 1,2,3,4.” Making Sense of the Future that has Already Arrived! pp. 24–25. New York: NextDesign Leadership Institute. https://issuu.com/nextd/docs/nextdfutures2011_v02
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. 2020. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V. and Karana, E. 2016. “Materials Experience as a Foundation for Materials and Design Education,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(4): 613–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petreca, B., Bianchi-Berthouze, N. L. and Baurley, S. 2015. “How Do Designers Feel Textiles.” In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII, pp. 982-987.
   Google Scholar
• Petreca, B., Saito, C., Baurley, S., Atkinson, D., Yu, X. and Berthouze, N. 2019. “Radically Relational Tools: A Design Framework to Explore Materials through Embodied Processes,” International Journal of Design, 13(2): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, J., Russell, J.A. and Peterson, B.S. 2005. “The Circumplex Model of Affect: An Integrative Approach to Affective Neuroscience, Cognitive Development, and Psychopathology,” Development and Psychopathology, 17(3): 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, T.J., Diamond, M.E. and Wing, A.M. 2011. Active Touch Sensing. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rognoli, V. 2010. “A Broad Survey on Expressive-sensorial Characterization of Materials for Design Education,” METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 27(2): 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, I.J. 1991. “Appraisal Determinants of Discrete Emotions,” Cognition & Emotion, 5(3): 161–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J.A. 1980. “A Circumplex Model of Affect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6): 1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, S., Funk, M. and Chisholm, D. 2013. “World Health Assembly Adopts Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020,” The Lancet, 381(9882): 1970–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, J.H. and Aravindan, P. 2015. Designing Interactive Soft Toys for Children with Autism to Improve Communications through Sensory Relaxation. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 389–303. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sonneveld, M.H. and Schifferstein, H.N.J. 2008. “The Tactual Experience of Objects.” Product Experience, pp. 41–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Suelar, V. and Okur, A. 2007. “Sensory Evaluation Methods for Tactile Properties of Fabrics,” Journal of Sensory Studies, 22(1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, J. 2004. “Design Expression and Human Experience: Evolving Design Practice.” In: McDonagh, D., Hekkert, P., Van Erp, J., & Gyi, D. (eds.) Design and Emotion: The Experience of Everyday Things, pp. 28–33. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, A., Bansal, R., Liu, J., Gerber, A.J., Goh, S., Posner, J., Colibazzi, T., Algermissen, M., Chiang, I. C. and Russell, J. A. 2014. “Using the Circumplex Model of Affect to Study Valence and Arousal Ratings of Emotional Faces by Children and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders,” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(6): 1332–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tienhoven, M. A. 2018. "Fashion and Affect: Exploring Affective Method,", Master's Thesis. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. 2006. “Embodying Design: The Lived Relationship between Artefact, User and the Lived Experience of Design.” In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design, Vol. 1, pp. 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Workman, J.E. 2010. “Fashion Consumer Groups, Gender, and Need for Touch,” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(2): 126–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winakor, G., Kim, C.J. and Wolins, L. 1980. “Fabric Hand: Tactile Sensory Assessment,” Textile Research Journal, 50(10): 601–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner, M. and Eerola, T. 2010. “Self-report Measures and Models.” Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications, pp. 187–221. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, H., Hope, T. and Jones, M. 2014. “Tactile Aesthetics of Materials and Design.” Materials Experience, pp. 27–37. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, H., Jones, M., Hope, T. and Jones, R. 2016. “Sensory Perception of Material Texture in Consumer Products,” The Design Journal, 19(3): 405–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar