1,186
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Battle or ballet? Metaphors archaeological Facebook administrators live by

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Almansa Sánchez, Jaime. 2013. “To Be or Not to Be? Public Archaeology as a Tool of Public Opinion and the Dilemma of Intellectuality.” Archaeological Dialogues 20 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000044.
  • Atalay, Sonya. 2012. Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities. Community-Based Archaeology. University of California Press. doi:10.1525/9780520953468.
  • Axelsen, Irmelin. 2018. “Digital Archaeology. A Democratic Utopia.” Nordisk Museologi 2–3: 107–107. doi:10.5617/nm.6658.
  • Beale, Nicole, and Jessica Ogden. 2012. “Social Media at the CAA2012: A Reflective Report.” Internet Archaeology 32. doi:10.11141/ia.32.6.
  • Bonacchi, Chiara. 2017. “Digital Media in Public Archaeology.” In Key Concepts in Public Archaeology, edited by Gabriel Moshenska, 60–72. UCL Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1vxm8r7.9.
  • Bonacchi, Chiara. 2022. Heritage and Nationalism. London: UCL Press. doi:10.14324/111.9781787358010.
  • Bonacchi, Chiara, Mark Altaweel, and Marta Krzyzanska. 2018. “The Heritage of Brexit: Roles of the Past in the Construction of Political Identities through Social Media.” Journal of Social Archaeology 18 (2): 174–192. doi:10.1177/1469605318759713.
  • Bonacchi, Chiara, and Areti Galani. 2013. “Culturally Engaged? A People-Centred Approach to Understanding Digital Cultural Engagement on Social Media Platforms.” Report. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University. https://www.stir.ac.uk/research/hub/publication/876900.
  • Brown, Deidre, and George Nicholas. 2012. “Protecting Indigenous Cultural Property in the Age of Digital Democracy: Institutional and Communal Responses to Canadian First Nations and Māori Heritage Concerns.” Journal of Material Culture 17 (3): 307–324. doi:10.1177/1359183512454065.
  • Cameron, Duncan F. 1971. “The Museum, a Temple or the Forum.” Curator: The Museum Journal 14 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1971.tb00416.x.
  • Childress, James F., Eric M. Meslin, and Harold T. Shapiro, eds. 2005. Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Clifford, James. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. London: Harvard University Press.
  • Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94. Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure: S95–S120.
  • Colley, Sarah. 2014. “Social Media and Archaeological Communication: An Australian Survey.” Archäologische Informationen 36: 65–80. doi:10.11588/ai.2013.0.15385.
  • Cook, Katherine. 2019. “EmboDIYing Disruption: Queer, Feminist and Inclusive Digital Archaeologies.” European Journal of Archaeology 22 (3): 398–414. doi:10.1017/eaa.2019.23.
  • Dallas, Costis. 2015. “Curating Archaeological Knowledge in the Digital Continuum: From Practice to Infrastructure.” Open Archaeology 1 (1). doi:10.1515/opar-2015-0011.
  • Dallas, Costis. 2018. “Heritage Encounters on Social Network Sites, and the Affiliative Power of Objects.” In Culture and Perspective at Times of Crisis: State Structures, Private Initiative and the Public Character of Heritage, edited by Polina. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1034085.
  • De Man, Adriaan, and Cristiana Oliveira. 2016. “A Stakeholder Perspective on Heritage Branding and Digital Communication.” In Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation, edited by Vicky Katsoni, and Anastasia Stratigea, 447–455. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer International Publishing.
  • Delgado Anés, Lara, Pablo Romero Pellitero, and Lorna-Jane Richardson. 2017. “Virtual Archaeology through Social Networks. The Case of the 1st Public Archaeology Twitter Conference.” In Virtual Archaeology through Social Networks. The case of the 1st Public Archaeology Twitter Conference, edited by Nuria Rodriguez Ortega, 293–98. Malaga: Sociedad Internacional Humanidades Digitales Hispánicas. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/69007/.
  • Dennis, L. Meghan. 2020. “Digital Archaeological Ethics: Successes and Failures in Disciplinary Attention.” Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 3 (1): 210–218. doi:10.5334/jcaa.24.
  • Dijck, Jose van. 2013. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dijck, José van, and Thomas Poell. 2013. “Understanding Social Media Logic.” Media and Communication 1 (1): 1–14. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2309065. doi:10.17645/mac.v1i1.69.
  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
  • Edele, Mark. 2017. “Fighting Russia’s History Wars: Vladimir Putin and the Codification of World War II.” History and Memory 29 (2): 90–124. doi:10.2979/histmemo.29.2.05.
  • Enke, N., and N. S. Borchers. 2019. “Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 13 (4): 261–277. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2019.1620234.
  • Flewellen, Ayana Omilade, Justin P. Dunnavant, Alicia Odewale, Alexandra Jones, Tsione Wolde-Michael, Zoë Crossland, and Maria Franklin. 2021. “‘The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist’: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter.” American Antiquity 86 (2): 224–243. doi:10.1017/aaq.2021.18.
  • Gauntlett, David. 2011. Making Is Connecting. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Giaccardi, Elisa, ed. 2012. Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Gibbs, Raymond W. 2011. “The Social Nature of Embodied Cognition: A View from the World of Metaphor.” Intellectica 56 (2): 81–98. doi:10.3406/intel.2011.1148.
  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Seyla Benhabib, 21–30. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hagmann, Dominik. 2018. “Reflections on the Use of Social Networking Sites as an Interactive Tool for Data Dissemination in Digital Archaeology.” Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica 9 (1): 7–20. doi:10.24916/iansa.2018.1.1.
  • Harding, Sandra. 1995. “‘Strong Objectivity’: A Response to the New Objectivity Question.” Synthese 104 (3): 331–349. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20117437. doi:10.1007/BF01064504.
  • Haukaas, Colleen, and Lisa M. Hodgetts. 2016. “The Untapped Potential of Low-Cost Photogrammetry in Community-Based Archaeology: A Case Study from Banks Island, Arctic Canada.” Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage 3 (1): 40–56. doi:10.1080/20518196.2015.1123884.
  • Hogan, Bernie. 2010. “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (6): 377–386. doi:10.1177/0270467610385893.
  • Holland, Dorothy, and William Lachicotte. 2007. “Vygotsky, Mead, and the New Sociocultural Studies of Identity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, edited by H. Daniels, J. V. Wertsch, and M. Cole, 1st ed., 101–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.005.
  • Hutchins, Ed. 1995. “How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds.” Cognitive Science 19 (3): 265–288. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1.
  • Huvila, Isto. 2014. “Engagement Has Its Consequences: The Emergence of the Representations of Archaeology in Social Media.” Archäologische Informationen 36: 21–30. doi:10.11588/ai.2013.0.15382.
  • Jeffrey, Stuart. 2012. “A New Digital Dark Age? Collaborative Web Tools, Social Media and Long-Term Preservation.” World Archaeology 44 (4): 553–570. doi:10.1080/00438243.2012.737579.
  • Kansa, Eric C., Sarah Whitcher Kansa, and Ethan Watrall. 2011. “Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration.” Cotsen Digital Archaeology Series, January. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1r6137tb.
  • Kelpšienė, Ingrida. 2019. “Exploring Archaeological Organizations’ Communication on Facebook: A Review of MOLA’s Facebook Page.” Advances in Archaeological Practice 7 (2): 203–214. doi:10.1017/aap.2019.9.
  • Kidd, Jenny. 2013. “Enacting Engagement Online: Framing Social Media Use for the Museum.” Information Technology & People, April. doi:10.1108/09593841111109422.
  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kuckartz, Udo. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laracuente, Nicolas R. 2016. “Public Archaeology 2.0: Facilitating Engagement with Twitter.” AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology 2: 81–99. doi:10.23914/ap.v2i0.15.
  • Laužikas, Rimvydas, Costis Dallas, Suzie Thomas, Ingrida Kelpšienė, Isto Huvila, Pedro Luengo, Helena Nobre, Marina Toumpouri, and Vykintas Vaitkevičius. 2018. “Archaeological Knowledge Production and Global Communities: Boundaries and Structure of the Field.” Open Archaeology 4 (1): 350–364. doi:10.1515/opar-2018-0022.
  • Lindlof, Thomas R. 2008. “Idiographic vs Nomothetic Science.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci005.
  • Lotman, Yuri. 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Marakos, Panteleimon. 2014. “Museums and Social Media: Modern Methods of Reaching Wider Audiences.” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 14 (4): 75–81. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13707.
  • Matthews, Jacqueline, and Lynley Wallis. 2015. “Broadcasting, Listening and the Mysteries of Public Engagement: An Investigation of the AAA Online Audience.” Australian Archaeology 81 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/03122417.2015.11682060.
  • Morgan, Colleen, and Stuart Eve. 2012. “DIY and Digital Archaeology: What Are You Doing to Participate?” World Archaeology 44 (4): 521–537. doi:10.1080/00438243.2012.741810.
  • Morgan, Colleen, and Pierre Marc Pallascio. 2015. “Digital Media, Participatory Culture, and Difficult Heritage: Online Remediation and the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.” Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage 4 (3): 260–278. doi:10.1080/21619441.2015.1124594.
  • Morris, James. 2011. “Zoobook: Archaeologists Connecting through Social Media.” The SAA Archaeological Record 11 (1): 30–32. https://www.academia.edu/373517/Zoobook_Archaeologists_Connecting_through_Social_Media.
  • Moser, Stephanie, Darren Glazier, James E. Phillips, Lamya Nasser el Nemr, Mohammed Saleh Mousa, Rascha Nasr Aiesh, Susan Richardson, Andrew Conner, and Michael Seymour. 2002. “Transforming Archaeology through Practice: Strategies for Collaborative Archaeology and the Community Archaeology Project at Quseir, Egypt.” World Archaeology 34 (2): 220–248. doi:10.1080/0043824022000007071.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66 (3): 745–758. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349.
  • Musolff, Andreas. 2017. “Metaphor and Cultural Cognition.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, edited by Farzad Sharifian, 325–344. Singapore: Springer.
  • Ortman, Scott G. 2000. “Conceptual Metaphor in the Archaeological Record: Methods and an Example from the American Southwest.” American Antiquity 65 (4): 613–645. doi:10.2307/2694419.
  • Parks, Malcolm R. 2010. ‘Social Network Sites as Virtual Communities.’ In A Networked Self, 105–23. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Patania, Ilaria, and Yitzchak Jaffe. 2018. “Eating Archaeology: Experimenting with Food in Public Outreach.” Public Archaeology, November. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108014655187.2018.1510361.
  • Perry, Sara, and Nicole Beale. 2015. “‘The Social Web and Archaeology’s Restructuring: Impact, Exploitation, Disciplinary Change.’.” Open Archaeology 1 (1). doi:10.1515/opar-2015-0009.
  • Perry, Sara, Lucy Shipley, and Jim Osborne. 2015. “Digital Media, Power and (In)Equality in Archaeology and Heritage.” Internet Archaeology 38. doi:10.11141/ia.38.4.
  • Pett, D. 2012. “Use of Social Media Within the British Museum and the Museum Sector.” In Archaeology and Digital Communication: Towards Strategies of Public Engagement, edited by C. Bonacchi, 83–102. London, UK: Archetype Publications. http://www.archetype.co.uk/publication-details.php?id=155.
  • Restivo, Sal, and Jennifer Croissant. 2008. “Social Constructionism in Science and Technology Studies.” In Handbook of Constructionist Research, edited by James A. Holstein, and Jaber F. Gubrium, 213–229. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Richardson, Lorna. 2012. “Twitter and Archaeology: An Archaeological Network in 140 Characters or Less.” In Archaeologists and Digital Communication, edited by Chiara Bonacchi, 15–24. London: Archetype. https://archetype.co.uk/our-titles/archaeology-and-digital-communication/?id=155.
  • Richardson, L. J. 2014. “Understanding Archaeological Authority in a Digital Context.” Internet Archaeology 38: 8. doi:10.11141/ia.38.1.
  • Richardson, Lorna-Jane. 2015. “Qualitative and Quantitative Data on the Use of the Internet for Archaeological Information.” Journal of Open Archaeology Data 4. doi:10.5334/joad.ag.
  • Richardson, Lorna-Jane. 2018. “Ethical Challenges in Digital Public Archaeology.” Journal of Open Archaeology Data 1 (1): 64–73. doi:10.5334/joad.ag.
  • Rocks-Macqueen, Doug. 2016. “Digital Public Engagement through Social Media in Archaeology – How to Choose.” Present Pasts 7 (1): 1. doi:10.5334/pp.62.
  • Schmitt, Rudolf. 2005. “Systematic Metaphor Analysis as a Method of Qualitative Research.” The Qualitative Report 10 (2): 358–394. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1854.
  • Stump, Daryl. 2013. “On Applied Archaeology, Indigenous Knowledge, and the Usable Past.” Current Anthropology 54 (3): 268–298. doi:10.1086/670330.
  • Talja, Sanna, Kimmo Tuominen, and Reijo Savolainen. 2005. “‘Isms’ in Information Science: Constructivism, Collectivism and Constructionism.” edited by Birger Hjørland. Journal of Documentation 61 (1): 79–101. doi:10.1108/00220410510578023.
  • Tarlow, Sarah, and Liv Nilsson Stutz. 2013. “Can an Archaeologist Be a Public Intellectual?” Archaeological Dialogues 20 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000032.
  • Wakefield, Christopher. 2020. “Digital Public Archaeology at Must Farm: A Critical Assessment of Social Media Use for Archaeological Engagement.” Internet Archaeology 55 (October). doi:10.11141/ia.55.9.
  • Walker, Dominic. 2014a. “Decentering the Discipline? Archaeology, Museums and Social Media.” Online Journal in Public Archaeology 4: 77–102. doi:10.23914/ap.v4i0.44.
  • Walker, Dominic. 2014b. “Antisocial Media in Archaeology?” Archaeological Dialogues 21 (2): 217–235. doi:10.1017/S1380203814000221.
  • Whitcher Kansa, Sarah, and Francis Deblauwe. 2011. “User-Generated Content in Zooarchaeology: Exploring the “Middle Space” of Scholarly Communication.” In Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, edited by Eric C. Kansa, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, and Ethan Watrall, 185–206. Los Angeles: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
  • Williams, Howard, and Alison Atkin. 2015. “Virtually Dead: Digital Public Mortuary Archaeology.” Internet Archaeology 40 (November). doi:10.11141/ia.40.7.4.
  • Yavuz, M. Hakan. 2020. Nostalgia for the Empire: The Politics of Neo-Ottomanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.