Determination of optimal potential parameters for the self-assembly of various lattice structures

References

• Grzelczak M, Vermant J, Furst EM, et al. Directed self-assembly of nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4(7):3591–3605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger FM, Seredyuk VA, Apkarian RP, et al. Colloidal assemblies of branched geminis studied by cryo-etch-HRSEM. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124(42):12408–12409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates FS, Hillmyer MA, Lodge TP, et al. Multiblock polymers: panacea or pandora’s box? Science. 2012;336(6080):434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill KA, MacCallum JL. The protein-folding problem, 50 years on. Science. 2012;338(6110):1042–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YC, Moon JY. Introduction to bionanotechnology: biological self-assembly. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro AV, Han D, Shih WM, et al. Challenges and opportunities for structural DNA nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(12):763–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Jiang Q, Li N, et al. DNA origami as an in vivo drug delivery vehicle for cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2014;8(7):6633–6643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehn JM. Supramolecular chemistry. Science. 1993;260(5115):1762–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen TL, Tien J, Oliver SR, et al. Design and self-assembly of open, regular, 3D mesostructures. Science. 1999;284(5416):948–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs L, Chin DN, Bowden N, et al. Self‐assembling systems on scales from nanometers to millimeters: design and discovery. Vol. 4, Perspectives in supramolecular chemistry: supramolecular materials and technologies; 1999. p. 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman ZM, Howard MP, Lindquist BA, et al. Inverse methods for design of soft materials. J Chem Phys. 2020;152(14):140902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquato S. Inverse optimization techniques for targeted self-assembly. Soft Matter. 2009;5(6):1157–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcotte, Stillinger FH, Torquato S. Unusual ground states via monotonic convex pair potentials. J Chem Phys. 2011;134(16):164105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechtsman MC, Stillinger FH, Torquato S. Optimized interactions for targeted self-assembly: application to a honeycomb lattice. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(22):228301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Errington JR, Truskett TM. Dimensionality and design of isotropic interactions that stabilize honeycomb, square, simple cubic, and diamond lattices. Phys. Rev. X. 2014;4(3):031049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Lengeling B, Aspuru-Guzik A. Inverse molecular design using machine learning: generative models for matter engineering. Science. 2018;361(6400):360–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber D. Bayesian reasoning and machine learning. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shell MS. The relative entropy is fundamental to multiscale and inverse thermodynamic problems. J Chem Phys. 2008;129(14):144108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaimovich A, Shell MS. Coarse-graining errors and numerical optimization using a relative entropy framework. J Chem Phys. 2011;134(9):094112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñeros WD, Lindquist BA, Jadrich RB, et al. Inverse design of multicomponent assemblies. J Chem Phys. 2018;148(10):104509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñeros WD, Baldea M, Truskett TM. Designing convex repulsive pair potentials that favor assembly of kagome and snub square lattices. J Chem Phys. 2016;145(5):054901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist BA, Jadrich RB, Truskett TM. Communication: inverse design for self-assembly via on-the-fly optimization. J Chem Phys. 2016;145(11):111101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadrich R, Lindquist B, Truskett T. Probabilistic inverse design for self-assembling materials. J Chem Phys. 2017;146(18):184103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñeros WD, Truskett TM. Designing pairwise interactions that stabilize open crystals: truncated square and truncated hexagonal lattices. J Chem Phys. 2017;146(14):144501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sütõ A. Crystalline ground states for classical particles. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(26):265501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uche OU, Stillinger FH, Torquato S. Constraints on collective density variables: two dimensions. Phys. Rev. E. 2004;70(4):046122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund E, Lindgren O, Jacobi MN. Designing isotropic interactions for self-assembly of complex lattices. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(8):085503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund E, Lindgren O, Jacobi MN. Using the uncertainty principle to design simple interactions for targeted self-assembly. J Chem Phys. 2013;139(2):024107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adorf CS, Antonaglia J, Dshemuchadse J, et al. Inverse design of simple pair potentials for the self-assembly of complex structures. J Chem Phys. 2018;149(20):204102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folland GB, Sitaram A. The uncertainty principle: a mathematical survey. J Fourier Anal Appl. 1997;3(3):207–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowko M, editor. Computational methods in surface and colloid science. CRC Press; 2019. ISBN 0429524838
   Google Scholar
• Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Comput Phys. 1995;117(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar