Improved dispersibility of nanofibrillated cellulose via simple microwave-assisted esterification

References

• Brinchi L, Cotana F, Fortunati E, et al. Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94(1):154–169. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missoum K, Martoïa F, Belgacem MN, et al. Effect of chemically modified nanofibrillated cellulose addition on the properties of fiber-based materials. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;48:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhim JW, Park HM, Ha CS. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2013;38(10–11):1629–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Kumar S, Kona BR, et al. Gas barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2015;5(78):63669–63690. doi: 10.1039/C5RA10333A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemlou M, Daver F, Ivanova EP, et al. Surface modifications of nanocellulose: from synthesis to high-performance nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci. 2021;119:101418. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph T, Sahoo S, Halligudi SB. Brönsted acidic ionic liquids: a green, efficient and reusable catalyst system and reaction medium for fischer esterification. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2005;234(1–2):107–110. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2005.03.005.
   Google Scholar
• Peng SX, Chang H, Kumar S, et al. A comparative guide to controlled hydrophobization of cellulose nanocrystals via surface esterification. Cellulose. 2016;23(3):1825–1846. doi: 10.1007/s10570-016-0912-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daud JB, Lee KY. Surface modification of nanocellulose. Handb Nanocel Cellul Nanocomp. 2017;1:101–122.
   Google Scholar
• Huang P, Wu M, Kuga S, et al. Aqueous pretreatment for reactive ball milling of cellulose. Cellulose. 2013;20(4):2175–2178. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-9940-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayya S, Tawichai N, Intatha U, et al. Tailoring nanofibrillated cellulose through sonication and its potential use in molded pulp packaging. Nanocomposites. 2021;7(1):109–122. doi: 10.1080/20550324.2021.1949517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi J, Oksman K, Illikainen M, et al. Sonication-assisted surface modification method to expedite the water removal from cellulose nanofibers for use in nanopapers and paper making. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;197:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satgè C, Verneuil B, Branland P, et al. Rapid homogenous esterification of cellulose induced by microwave irradiation. Carbohydr Polym. 2002;49(3):373–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semsarilar M, Perrier S. Solubilization and functionalization of cellulose assisted by microwave irradiation. Aust J Chem. 2009;62(3):223–226. doi: 10.1071/CH08491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sèbe G, Ham-Pichavant F, Pecastaings G. Dispersibility and emulsion-stabilizing effect of cellulose nanowhiskers esterified by vinyl acetate and vinyl cinnamate. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(8):2937–2944. doi: 10.1021/bm400854n.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peydecastaing J, Girardeau S, Vaca-Garcia C, et al. Long chain cellulose esters with very low DS obtained with non-acidic catalysts. Cellulose. 2006;13(1):95–103. doi: 10.1007/s10570-005-9012-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Liu Q, Chen H, et al. Direct grafting modification of pulp in ionic liquids and self-assembly behavior of the graft copolymers. Cellulose. 2013;20(2):873–884. doi: 10.1007/s10570-012-9847-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missoum K, Belgacem MN, Barnes JP, et al. Nanofibrillated cellulose surface grafting in ionic liquid. Soft Matter. 2012;8(32):8338–8349. doi: 10.1039/c2sm25691f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang N, Xu B, et al. Comparative study on different modified preparation methods of cellulose nanocrystalline. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(19):3417. doi: 10.3390/polym13193417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Lu J, Tusiime R, et al. Properties of poly (l-lactic acid) reinforced by l-lactic acid grafted nanocellulose crystal. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;156:314–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdous K, Uddin MR, Uddin MR, et al. Preparation and optimization of biodiesel production from mixed feedstock oil. CES. 2013;1(4):62–66. doi: 10.12691/ces-1-4-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ding J, Xia Z, Lu J. Esterification and deacidification of a waste cooking oil (TAN 68.81 mg KOH/g) for biodiesel production. Energies. 2012;5(8):2683–2691. doi: 10.3390/en5082683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang X, Xie Y, et al. Functional nanomaterials through esterification of cellulose: a review of chemistry and application. Cellulose. 2018;25(7):3703–3731. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-1830-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han G, Liu F, Zhang T, et al. Study of microwave non-thermal effects on hydrogen bonding in water by raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2023;285:121877. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hong TD, Thao NT, Kieu TDT, et al. Effects of reaction conditions on the degree of substitution in acetylated nanocellulose. Vietnam J Catal Adsorpt. 2020;9(4):22–28. doi: 10.51316/jca.2020.065.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Hadi N, Wiege B, Stabenau S, et al. Comparison of three methods to determine the degree of substitution of quinoa and rice starch acetates, propionates, and butyrates: direct stoichiometry, FTIR, and 1H-NMR. Foods. 2020;9(1):83. doi: 10.3390/foods9010083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin C, Wang W, Li W, et al. Developing bagasse towards superhydrophobic coatings. Cellulose. 2021;28(6):3617–3630. doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-03743-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevie FA, Donley CL. Introduction to x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Vac Sci Technol A. 2020;38(6):3204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greczynski G, Hultman L. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: towards reliable binding energy referencing. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;107:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiari R, Rol F, Brochier Salon MC, et al. Efficiency of cellulose carbonates to produce cellulose nanofibers. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2019;7(9):8155–8167. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera IC, Berlioz S, Fahs A, et al. Chemical functionalization of nano fibrillated cellulose by glycidyl silane coupling agents: a grafted silane network characterization study. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;165(Pt B):1773–1782. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.045.
   Google Scholar
• Gao X, Liu H, Shuai J, et al. Rapid transesterification of cellulose in a novel DBU-derived ionic liquid: efficient synthesis of highly substituted cellulose acetate. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;242(Pt 4):125133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125133.
   Google Scholar
• Baraka F, Robles E, Labidi J. Microwave-assisted esterification of bleached and unbleached cellulose nanofibers. Ind Crops Prod. 2023;191:115970. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun Y, Whiteside S, Thomas R, et al. The effect of solvent mixture on the properties of solvent cast polylactic acid (PLA) film. J Appl Polymer Sci. 2012;124(5):3577–3582. doi: 10.1002/app.34071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Kumari S, Rai B, et al. Effect of nano-cellulosic fiber on mechanical and barrier properties of polylactic acid (PLA) green nanocomposite film. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(12):125108. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5755.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran S, Ramanathan S, Basak T. Microwave food processing—A review. Food Res Int. 2013;52(1):243–261. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar