Tuning the office sound masking and the architectonics of office work

References

• Aronoff, S. 1995. Total Workplace Performance: Rethinking the Office Environment. Ottawa: WDL Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Aschenbach, J. 1984. “Turn on Pink Noise: It Quickly Seems Quieter.” The Daily Times, March 17, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Beranek, L. L. 1957. “Revised Criteria for Noise in Buildings.” Noise Control, January 3, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Beranek, L. 2008. Riding the Waves. A Life in Sound, Science, and Industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernasconi, G., and S. Nellen, eds. 2019. Das Büro: Zur Rationalisierung des Interieurs, 1880–1960. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bijsterveld, K. 2008. Mechanical Sound. Technology, Culture, and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, A. 1971. Open-Plan Offices. Translated by Das Grossraum-Büro. London: Business Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G., ed. 2013. Music, Sound and Space. Transformations of Public and Private Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. 1958. “Effect of Noise on an ‘Intellectual’ Task.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30: 824–827. doi:10.1121/1.1909779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, M.J. 1972. “Office Landscape: Does It Work?” Applied Ergonomics 3 (4): 226. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(72)90105-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, M. 2007. Sound Moves. iPod Culture and Urban Experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burkeman, O. 2018. “Open-plan Office? No, Thanks, I’d Rather Get Some Work Done.” The Guardian, November 9.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Sound Mangement Inc. 2017. Company Profile. Cambridge: Cambridge Sound Management.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, L.D., W. R. Miles, and S. S. Stevens. 1943. “Vision, Hearing, and Aeronautical Design.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 10 (4): 127–149. doi:10.2514/8.11011.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, K. 2005. “Noise Making Subjects.” PhD diss., University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, W.J., W.R. Farrell, P.W. Hirtle, and B.G. Watters. 1962. “Speech Privacy in Buildings.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34 (4): 475–492. doi:10.1121/1.1918154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanaud, R.C. 1976. “Variable and Adaptive Masking Sound Systems.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60 (S1): 58. doi:10.1121/1.2003429.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, C. 2021. “Google’s Plan or the Future of Work: Privacy Robots and Balloon Walls.” New York Times, April 30.
   Google Scholar
• Delamotte, Y., and K. F. Walker. 1976. “Humanization of Work and the Quality of Working Life.” International Journal of Sociology 6 (1): 8–40. doi:10.1080/15579336.1976.11769634.
   Google Scholar
• Dibben, N., and A. B. Haake. 2013. “Music and the Construction of Space in office-based Work Settings.” In Music, Sound and Space. Transformations of Public and Private Experience, edited by G. Born, 151–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Droumeva, M. 2021. “Soundscapes of Productivity. The Coffee-Office and the Sonic Gentrification of Work.” Resonance: The Journal of Sound and Culture 2 (3): 377–394. doi:10.1525/res.2021.2.3.377.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. 1959. Landmarks of Tomorrow. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap and Associates. 1963. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Overloading Fallout Shelters. Santa Barbara, CA: Dunlap & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dzubay, G. 1997. “Sound Masking for the Office Unmasked”. Sound & Communications, December 22, 34–46. Port Washington, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, W.R., and B.G. Watters. 1959. “Speech Privacy Design Analyzer.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31: 1577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, N.R., and J.C. Steinberg. 1947. “Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19 (90): 90–119. doi:10.1121/1.1916407.
   Google Scholar
• Fucigna, J. T. 1967. “The Ergonomics of Offices.” Ergonomics 10 (5): 589–604. doi:10.1080/00140136708930912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajeda, T. 2013. “Early Mood Music: Edison’s Phonography, American Modernity and the Instrumentalization of Listening.” In Ubiquitous Musics. The Everyday Sounds That We Don’t Always Notice, edited by Marta G. Quiunones, Anahid Kassabian, and Elena Boschi, 31–48. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hagood, M. 2019. Hush. Media and Sonic Self-Control. Durham, PA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. 1959. A Silent Language. New York: Doubleday and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M.R., and E.T. Hall. 1975. The Fourth Dimension in Architecture: The Impact of Building on Behavior. Santa Fe, NM: Sunstone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamme, R., and D. Huggins. 1968. “Acoustics in the Open Plan.” Office Design, September reprint, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. A., A. E. Palmer, M. S. Lewis, D. L. Munson, G. Meckler, and R. Gerdes. 1981. Planning and Designing the Office Environment. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Herman Miller Inc. 1976a. Action Office by Herman Miller: Sound Solutions for Office Privacy. Ann Arbor: Herman Miller Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Herman Miller Inc. 1976b. “Acoustic Problems? Here’s a Checklist.” Ideas, August 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Herman Miller Inc. 2005. Sound Management Sales Handbook. Zeeland, MI: Herman Miller.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B. 1984. “Noise-piping Plan Has Office Workers Upset.” Ottawa Citizen, March 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, R. 2017. “Office Interiors and the Fantasy of Information Work.” Triple C 15 (2): 540–562. doi:10.31269/triplec.v15i2.763.
   Google Scholar
• Hosokawa, S. 1984. “The Walkman Effect.” Popular Music 4: 165–180. doi:10.1017/S0261143000006218.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, A. 2014. “Muzak-While-You-Work: Programming Music for Industry, 1919–1948.” Historische Anthropologie 22 (3): 364–383. doi:10.7788/ha-2014-0306.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 2005. “Music in Factories: A twentieth-century Technique for Control of the Productive Self.” Social & Cultural Geography 6 (5): 723–744. doi:10.1080/14649360500258229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Buhler, J. 2016. “Progressive Partitions. The Promises and Problems of the American Open Plan Office.” Design and Culture 8 (2): 205–233. doi:10.1080/17547075.2016.1189308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann-Buhler, J. 2021. Open-Plan. A Design History of the American Office. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, J. 2020. The Architecture of Good Behavior. Psychology and Modern Institutional Design in Postwar America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korczynski, M., M. Pickering, and E. Robertson. 2013. Rhythms of Labour. Music at Work in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kryter, K. D. 1950. “The Effects of Noise on Man.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Monograph Supplement 1: 1–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kryter, K.D. 1962. “Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34 (11): 1689–1697. doi:10.1121/1.1909094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, N. 2017. “The Nature of the Glut: Information Overload in Postwar America.” History of the Human Sciences 30: 32–49. doi:10.1177/0952695116686016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. T., and P.E. O’Sullivan. 1974. “Acoustic Privacy in Office Design.” Journal of Architectural Research 3 (1): 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Makower, J. 1981. Office Hazards: How Your Job Can Make You Sick. Washington, DC: Tilden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J. G. 2017. The Age of Noise in Britain. Hearing Modernity. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marmot, A. 2000. Office Space Planning. Designing for Tomorrow’s Workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2019. “Acoustic Tile.” In The Oxford Handbook of Media, Technology, and Organization Studies, edited by T. Beyes, R. Holt, and C. Pias, 15–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 1960. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty. Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, D. 1972. “Be Quiet! Make a Little Noise.” Montreal Gazette, September 1, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, P. 2022. “I Can’t Face Going Back to Work in the Office.” The Guardian, March 20.
   Google Scholar
• Picker, J. M. 2003. Victorian Soundscapes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plourde, L. 2017. “Sonic air-conditioning: Muzak as Affect Management for Office Workers in Japan.” The Senses & Society 12 (1): 18–34. doi:10.1080/17458927.2017.1268812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propst, R. L. 1968. The Office. A Facility Based on Change. Ann Arbor: Herman Miller Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Propst, R. L., and M. Wodka. 1975. The Action Office Acoustic Handbook. Ann Arbor, MI: Herman Miller Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Riland, L. H. 1970. “Summary: A Survey of Employee Reactions to the Landscape Environment One Year after Initial Occupation.” Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak, March.
   Google Scholar
• Ris, V. 2021. “The Environmentalization of Space and Listening. An Archaeology of noise-cancelling Headphones and Spotify’s Concentration Playlists.” Sound Effects. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Sound and Sound Experience 10 (1): 158–172. doi:10.7146/se.v10i1.124204.
   Google Scholar
• Rumpfhuber, A. 2013. Architektur immaterieller Arbeit. Vienna: Verlag Turia + Kant.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, A. 2018. Environmental Design. Architecture, Politics, and Science in Postwar America. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. 2002. “Techno-Territories: The Spatial, Technological and Social Reorganization of Office Work.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Shumake, M. G. 1992. Increasing Productivity and Profit in the Workplace: A Guide to Office Planning and Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Somaiya, R. 2008. “Noises off.” The Guardian, October 23.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, R. 1966. “Man’s Proximate Environment.” Journal of Social Issues 12 (4): 59–70. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1966.tb00549.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, R. 1969. Personal Space. The Behavioral Basis of Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, M. 2017. “Man Not a Machine: Models, Minds, and Mental Labor, C. 1980.” Progress in Brain Research 223: 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. 1997. “Sounds like the Mall of America: Programmed Music and the Architectonics of Commercial Space.” Ethnomusicology 41 (1): 22–50. doi:10.2307/852577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, G. 2021. “The Empty Office: What We Lose When We Work from Home.” The Guardian, June 3.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. 2002. The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900–1930. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Touloumi, O. 2014. “Architectures of Global Communication: Psychoacoustics, Acoustic Space, and the Total Environment, 1941–1970.” PhD diss., Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R.A. 1969. “Office Acoustics. Effect of Background Noise.” Applied Acoustics 2: 121–130. doi:10.1016/0003-682X(69)90014-0.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, H. 2010. “Head Cocoons. A Sensori-Social History of Earphone Use in West Germany, 1950–2010.” The Senses & Society 5 (3): 339–363. doi:10.2752/174589210X12753842356089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittje, R. 2016. The Age of Electroacoustics. Transforming Science and Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar