144
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH REPORTS

The Impact of Stone Supply Stress on the Innovation of a Cultural Variant: The Relationship of Folsom and Midland

References

  • Amick, D. S. 1995. “Patterns of technological variation among Folsom and Midland projectile points in the American Southwest.” Plains Anthropologist 40: 23–38.
  • Andrefsky, W., Jr. 2009. “The analysis of stone tool procurement, production, and maintenance.” Journal of Archaeological Research 17: 65–103. doi: 10.1007/s10814-008-9026-2
  • Bamforth, D. B. 1991. “Flintknapping skill, communal hunting, and Paleoindian projectile point typology.” Plains Anthropologist 36: 309–322.
  • Bamforth, D. B., and M. Becker. 2000. “Core/biface ratios, mobility, refitting, and artifact use-lives: A Paleoindian example.” Plains Anthropologist 45: 273–290.
  • Bamforth, D. B., and P. Bleed. 1997. “Technology, flaked stone technology, and risk.” In Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archaeological Explanation, edited by C. M. Barton, and G. A. Clark, 109–139. Arlington, VA: Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 7.
  • Bamforth, D. B., and N. Finlay. 2008. “Introduction: Archaeological approaches to lithic production skill and craft learning.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15: 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s10816-007-9043-3
  • Bement, L. C. 1999. “View from a kill: The Cooper site Folsom lithic assemblages.” In Folsom Lithic Technology, edited by D. S. Amick, 111–121. Archaeological Series 12. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory.
  • Bettinger, R. L., and J. Eerkens. 1999. “Point typologies, cultural transmission, and the spread of bow-and-arrow technology in the prehistoric Great Basin.” American Antiquity 64: 231–242. doi: 10.2307/2694276
  • Binford, L. R. 1973. “Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the “functional” argument.” In The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, edited by C. Renfrew, 227–254. London: Duckworth.
  • Bousman, C. B. 1993. “Hunger–gatherer adaptations, economic risk, and tool design.” Lithic Technology 18: 59–86. doi: 10.1080/01977261.1993.11720897
  • Bousman, C. B. 2005. “Coping with risk: Later stone age technological strategies at Blydefontein Rock Shelter, South Africa.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 193–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2005.05.001
  • Buchanan, B. 2006. “An analysis of Folsom projectile point resharpening using quantitative comparisons of form and allometry.” Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 185–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.008
  • Buchanan, B., M. J. O'Brien, J. D. Kilby, B. B. Huckell, and M. Collard. 2012. “An assessment of the impact of hafting on Paleoindian point variability.” PLoS One 7: e36364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036364
  • Collard, M., B. Buchanan, M. J. O'Brien, and J. Scholnick. 2013. “Risk, mobility or population size? Drivers of technological richness among contact-period western North American hunter–gatherers.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368: 20120412. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0412
  • Eerkens, J. W., and R. L. Bettinger. 2001. “Techniques for assessing standardization in artifact assemblages: Can we scale material variability?” American Antiquity 66: 493–504. doi: 10.2307/2694247
  • Eerkens, J. W., and R. L. Bettinger. 2008. “Cultural transmission and the analysis of stylistic and functional variation.” In Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Issues and Case Studies, edited by M. J. O'Brien, 21–38. Washington, DC: The Society for American Archaeology.
  • Elston, R. G., and P. J. Brantingham. 2002. “Microlithic technology in northern Asia: A risk-minimizing strategy of the late Paleolithic and early Holocene.” In Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, edited by R. G. Elston and S. L. Kuhn, 103–16. Washington, DC: Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Number 12.
  • Eren, M. I., B. Buchanan, and M. J. O'Brien. 2015. “Social learning and technological evolution during the Clovis colonization of the New World.” Journal of Human Evolution 80: 159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.01.002
  • Eren, M. I., A. Greenspan, and C. G. Sampson. 2008. “Are Upper Paleolithic blade cores more productive than Middle Paleolithic discoidal cores? A replication experiment.” Journal of Human Evolution 55: 952–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.009
  • Eren, M. I., and S. J. Lycett. 2012. “Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental ‘preferential’ Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes.” PLoS One 7: e29273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029273
  • Hofman, J. L. 1992. “Recognition and interpretation of Folsom technological variability on the southern Plains.” In Ice Age Hunters of the Rockies, edited by D. J. Stanford and J. S. Day, 193–229. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
  • Hofman, J. L., D. S. Amick, and R. O. Rose. 1990. “Shifting Sands: A Folsom-Midland assemblage from a campsite in western Texas.” Plains Anthropologist 35: 221–253.
  • Holliday, V. T. 2000. “The evolution of Paleoindian geochronology and typology on the Great Plains.” Geoarchaeology 15: 227–290. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(200003)15:3<227::AID-GEA2>3.0.CO;2-A
  • Hunzicker, D. A. 2008. “Folsom projectile technology: An experiment in design, effectiveness, and efficiency.” Plains Anthropologist 53: 291–311. doi: 10.1179/pan.2008.020
  • Ingbar, E. E., and J. L. Hofman. 1999. “Folsom fluting fallacies.” In Folsom Lithic Technology, edited by D. S. Amick, 98–110. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 12.
  • Jennings, T. A. 2012. “Clovis, Folsom, and Midland components at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas: Context, chronology, and assemblages.” Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3239–3247. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.05.007
  • Jennings, T. A. 2013. “The Hogeye Clovis cache, Texas: Quantifying lithic reduction signatures.” Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 649–658. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.016
  • Jennings, T. A. 2015. “Clovis adaptations in the Great Plains.” In Clovis: On the Edge of a New Understanding, edited by A. M. Smallwood and T. A. Jennings, 277–296. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
  • Jennings, T. A., C. D. Pevny, and W. A. Dickens. 2010. “A biface and blade core efficiency experiment: Implications for early Paleoindian technological organization.” Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 2155–2164. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.020
  • Jennings, T. A., and M. R. Waters. 2014. “Pre-Clovis lithic technology at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas: Comparisons to Clovis through site-level behavior, technological trait-list, and cladistic analyses.” American Antiquity 79: 25–44. doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.25
  • Lycett, S. J. 2015. “Cultural evolutionary approaches to artifact variation over time and space: Basis, progress, and prospects.” Journal of Archaeological Science 56: 21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.004
  • Lycett, S. J., and N. von Cramon-Taubadel. 2015. “Toward a ‘quantitative genetic’ approach to a lithic variation.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 646–675.
  • Lyman, R. L., T. L. VanPool, and M. J. O'Brien. 2008. “Variation in North American dart points and arrow points when one or both are present.” Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 2805–2812. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.008
  • MacDonald, D. H. 2010. “The evolution of Folsom fluting.” Plains Anthropologist 55: 39–54. doi: 10.1179/pan.2010.011
  • Meltzer, D. J. 2006. Folsom: New Archaeological Investigations of a Classic Paleoindian Bison Kill. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Meltzer, D. J., J. D. Seebach, and R. M. Byerly. 2006. “The Hot Tubb Folsom-Midland site (41CR10), Texas.” Plains Anthropologist 51: 157–184. doi: 10.1179/pan.2006.012
  • Mesoudi, A., and M. J. O'Brien. 2008. “The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology I: An experimental simulation.” American Antiquity 73: 3–28.
  • Nelson, M. C. 1991. “The study of technological organization.” In Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by M. B. Schiffer, vol. 3, 57–100. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • O'Brien, M. J., and R. A. Bently. 2011. “Stimulated variation and cascades: Two processes in the evolution of complex technological systems.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 18: 309–335. doi: 10.1007/s10816-011-9110-7
  • O'Brien, M. J., and R. L. Lyman. 2000. Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • O'Brien, M. J., and R. L. Lyman. 2003. Cladistics and Archaeology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  • O'Brien, M. J., M. T. Boulanger, B. Buchanan, M. Collard, R. L. Lyman, and J. Darwent. 2014. “Innovation and cultural transmission in the American Paleolithic: Phylogenetic analysis of eastern Paleoindian projectile-point classes.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 34: 100–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2014.03.001
  • Reitze, W. T., C. Sinkovec, and B. B. Huckell. 2012. “Folsom technology and toolstone use at the Martin site, north central New Mexico.” Plains Anthropologist 57: 237–259. doi: 10.1179/pan.2012.019
  • Richerson, P. J., and R. Boyd. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schillinger, K., A. Mesoudi, and S. J. Lycett. 2014. “Considering the role of time budgets on copy-error rates in material culture traditions: An experimental assessment.” PLoS One 9: e97157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097157
  • Sellet, F. 2004. “Beyond the point: Projectile manufacture and behavioral inference.” Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 1553–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.03.016
  • Shennan, S. 2008. “Evolution in archaeology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 75–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153
  • Shott, M. J. 1986. “Technological organization and settlement mobility: An ethnographic examination.” Journal of Anthropological Research 42: 15–51. doi: 10.1086/jar.42.1.3630378
  • Shott, M. J. 1996. “An exegesis of the curation concept.” Journal of Anthropological Research 52: 259–280. doi: 10.1086/jar.52.3.3630085
  • Shott, M. J., D. A. Hunzicker, and B. Patten. 2007. “Pattern and allometric measurement of reduction in experimental Folsom bifaces.” Lithic Technology 32: 203–217. doi: 10.1080/01977261.2007.11721048
  • Smallwood, A. M. 2012. “Clovis technology and settlement in the American Southeast: Using biface analysis to evaluate dispersal models.” American Antiquity 77: 689–713. doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.77.4.689
  • Surovell, T. A. 2009. Toward a Behavioral Ecology of Lithic Technology: Cases from Paleoindian Archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • VanPool, T. L., and R. D. Leonard. 2011. Quantitative Analysis in Archaeology. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Waters, M. R., and T. A. Jennings. 2015. The Hogeye Clovis Cache. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
  • Wendorf, F., and A. D. Krieger. 1959. “New light on the Midland discovery.” American Antiquity 25: 66–78. doi: 10.2307/276680
  • Wendorf, F., A. D. Krieger, C. C. Albritton, Jr, and T. D. Stewart. 1955. The Midland Discovery. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.