A Typology of Florida Fluted Points Using Landmark-based Geometric Morphometrics

References

• Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2004. “Geometric Morphometrics: Ten Years of Progress Following the ‘Revolution’.” Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5–16. doi: 10.1080/11250000409356545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahler, S., and P. Geib. 2000. “Why Flute? Folsom Point Design and Adaptation.” Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 799–820. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1999.0503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. G., A. C. Goodyear, J. Kennett, and A. West. 2011. “Multiple Lines of Evidence for Possible Human Population Decline/Settlement Reorganization during the Early Younger Dryas.” Quaternary International 242: 570–583. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. G., D. S. Miller, S. J. Yerka, J. C. Gillam, E. N. Johanson, D. T. Anderson, A. C. Goodyear, and A. M. Smallwood. 2010. “PIDBA (Paleoindian Database of the Americas) 2010: Current Status and Findings.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 3: 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. 1997. “Sloan Site Biface and Projectile Point Technology.” In Sloan: A Paleoindian Dalton Cemetery in Arkansas, 53–57. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., and M. Collard. 2010. “A Geometric Morphometrics-Based Assessment of Blade Shape Differences among Paleoindian Projectile Point Types from Western North America.” Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullen, R. P. 1975. A Guide to the Identification of Florida Projectile Points. Gainesville, FL: Kendall Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cardillo, M. 2010. “Some Applications of Geometric Morphometrics to Archaeology.” In Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians, 325–341. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Charlin, J., and R. González-José. 2018. “Testing an Ethnographic Analogy through Geometric Morphometrics: A Comparison Between Ethnographic Arrows and Archaeological Projectile Points from Late Holocene Fuego-Patagonia.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 51: 159–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, J. S. 2013. “Mental Templates and a Revised Typology for Florida Paleoindian Points.” Poster presented at the PaleoAmerican Odyssey Conference, Santa Fe, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, J. S. 2016. Paleoindian Societies of the Coastal Southeast. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, J. S., and C. A. Hemmings. 2004. “Florida Paleoindian Points and Knives.” In New Perspectives on the First Americans, edited by B. Lepper, R. Bonnichsen, and K. Turnmire, 65–72. College Station: Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2004. “Understanding ‘Clovis’ Fluted Point Variability in the Northeast: A Perspective from the Debert Site, Nova Scotia.” Canadian Journal of Archaeology 28: 205–253.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, G. E. 2006. “A Reevaluation of Bullen’s Typology for Preceramic Projectile Points.” Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, A. C. 2006. “Recognizing the Redstone Fluted Point in the South Carolina Paleoindian Point Database.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 23: 100–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, E. T. 1975. “The Silver Springs Site, Prehistory in the Silver Springs Valley, Florida.” The Florida Anthropologist 28: 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, N. D. 1987. Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States: A Modern Survey and Reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, C. P. 2011. “Morphoj: An Integrated Software Package for Geometric Morphometrics.” Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 353–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovarovic, K., L. C. Aiello, A. Cardini, and C. A. Lockwood. 2011. “Discriminant Function Analyses in Archaeology: Are Classification Rates too Good to be True?” Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 3006–3018. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, N. 1999. “Generalizing and Extending the Eigenshape Method of Shape Space Visualization and Analysis.” Paleobiology 25: 107–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, N. 2018. “The Quantitative Assessment of Archaeological Artifact Groups: Beyond Geometric Morphometrics.” Quaternary Science Reviews 201: 319–348. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., S. Cushman, and S. Stafford. 2000. Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mitteroecker, P., and F. Bookstein. 2011. “Linear Discrimination, Ordination, and the Visualization of Selection Gradients in Modern Morphometrics.” Evolutionary Biology 38: 100–114. doi: 10.1007/s11692-011-9109-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, W. T. 1958. “A Stratified Early Site at Silver Springs, Florida.” The Florida Anthropologist 11: 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura, M., and A. G. M. Araunjo. 2018. “Archaeology, Biology, and Borrowing: A Critical Examination of Geometric Morphometrics in Archaeology.” Journal of Archaeological Science 101: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevny, C. D., D. K. Thulman, and M. K. Faught. 2017. “Evidence for Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement Continuity in Florida.” In In the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition, 757–846. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, J. F. 2013. tpsDig2, Digitize Landmarks and Outlines. Stony Brook: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• Schroder, L. E. 1995. Anthropology of Florida Points and Blades. West Columbia, SC: American Systems of the Southeast.
   Google Scholar
• Sholts, S. B., D. J. Stanford, L. M. Flores, and S. K. T. S. Wärmländer. 2012. “Flake Scar Patterns of Clovis Points Analyzed with a New Digital Morphometrics Approach: Evidence for Direct Transmission of Technological Knowledge Across Early North America.” Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3018–3026. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, M., and B. Trail. 2010. “Exploring New Approaches to Lithic Analysis: Laser Scanning and Geometric Morphometrics.” Lithic Technology 35: 195–220. doi: 10.1080/01977261.2010.11721090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slice, D. E., ed. 2005. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and T. Goebel. 2018. “Origins and Spread of Fluted-Point Technology in the Canadian Ice-Free Corridor and Eastern Beringia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 4116–4121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800312115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., A. Smallwood, and T. DeWitt. 2015. “Defining the Normative Range of Clovis Fluted Point Shape Using Geographic Models of Geometric Morphometric Variation.” In Clovis: On the Edge of a New Understanding, edited by A. Smallwood and T. Jennings, 165–177. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thulman, D. K. 2007. “A Typology of Fluted Points From Florida.” The Florida Anthropologist 60: 165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Thulman, D. K. 2012. “Discriminating Paleoindian Point Types from Florida Using Landmark Geometric Morphometrics.” Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 1599–1607. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulman, D. K. 2018. ““Discerning Early Archaic Bolen Territories Using Geometric Morphometrics.” In Early Human Life on the Southeastern Coastal Plain, edited by A. C. Goodyear and C. R. Moore, 257–273. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tune, J. W. 2016. “The Clovis–Cumberland–Dalton Succession: Settling into the Midsouth United States during the Pleistocene to Holocene Transition.” PaleoAmerica 2: 261–273. doi: 10.1080/20555563.2016.1199193
   Google Scholar
• von Cramon-Taubadel, N., B. C. Frazier, and M. M. Lahr. 2007. “The Problem of Assessing Landmark Error in Geometric Morphometrics: Theory, Methods, and Modifications.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 134: 24–35. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, M. R., and T. W. Stafford Jr. 2007. “Redefining the Age of Clovis: Implications for the Peopling of the Americas.” Science 315: 1122–1126. doi: 10.1126/science.1137166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. W., and B. I. Ruttenberg. 2007. “Discriminant Function Analysis in Marine Ecology: Some Oversights and Their Solutions.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 329: 301–305. doi: 10.3354/meps329301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. K., and K. Titus. 1988. “Assessment of Sampling Stability in Ecological Applications of Discriminant Analysis.” Ecology 69: 1275–1285. doi: 10.2307/1941283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, and H. D. Sheets. 2012. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar