El hallazgo de la fantasía inconsciente en la sesión: Forma de reconocimiento

Referencias

• Baranger M (1961). La situación analítica como campo dinámico. Rev Urug Psicoanalisis 4(1):3–54.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (2008). The analytical situation as dynamic field. Int J Psychoanal 89:795–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger W (1980). Validez del Concepto de Objeto en la Obra de Melanie KleinIn Aportaciones al Concepto de Objeto en Psicoanalisis. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett E (2011). Kristeva. London: Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1961). Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1962). Learning from experience. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1975). A memoir of the future, London: Karnac, repr. 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Borossa J, Bronstein C, Pajaczkowska C, editors. (2014). The New Klein-Lacan Dialogues. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Brierley M (1937). Affects in theory and practice. Int J Psychoanal 18:256–68.
   Google Scholar
• Britton R (1989). The missing link: parental sexuality in the Oedipus complex. In: Britton R, Feldman M, O’Shaughnessy E, editors. The Oedipus Complex Today, 83–101. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein C (2001a). What are internal objects? In: Bronstein C, editor. Kleinian Theory: A Contemporary Perspective, 108–24. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein C (2001b). Melanie Klein: Beginnings. In: Bronstein C, editor. Kleinian Theory: A Contemporary Perspective, 1–16. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein C (2011). On psychosomatics: The search for meaning. Int J Psychoanal 92:173–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein C (2014). “I am not crying. I am rubbing my eyes”: Annie and the hollow object. Journal of Child Psychotherapy 40(2):135–49.
   Google Scholar
• Carpy DV (1989). Tolerating the countertransference: A mutative process. Int J Psychoanal 70:287–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman M (1994). Projective identification in phantasy and enactment. Psychoanal Inq 14:423–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1913). Stages in the development of the sense of reality. In: First Contributions to Psychoanalysis, 123–239. London: Hogarth Press, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1897a). Letter from Freud to Fliess, 2 May 1897. In: Masson JM (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904, 239. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1897b). Letter from Freud to Fliess, 21 September 1897. In: Masson JM (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904, 264. Cambridge, MA: TheBelknap Press of Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S. (1900–1901). The interpretation of dreams. SE 4 and 5.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. SE 12:213–26.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1915a). Instincts and their vicissitudes. SE 14:111–40.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1915b). The unconscious. SE 14:166–214.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1915c). Repression. SE 14:141–58.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1915d). A case of paranoia running counter to the psycho-analytic theory of the disease. SE 14:261–72.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1916). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE 15:1–240.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE 22:1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (1977). Conceptions of affect. Int J Psychoanal 58:129–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotstein J (2008). The overarching role of unconscious phantasy. Psychoanal Inq 28:190205.
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Williams M (1983). “Underlying pattern” in Bion’s memoir of the future. In: Mawson C, editor. Bion Today, 381–405. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann P (1952). Certain functions of introjection and projection in early infancy. In: Klein M, Heimann P, Isaacs S, Riviere J, editors. Developments in Psychoanalysis, 122–68. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs S (1948). The nature and function of phantasy. Int J Psychoanal 29:73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein M (1923). The role of the school in the libidinal development of the child. In: Love, Guilt and Reparation: The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol 1, 59–76. London: Hogarth Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1930). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. In: The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. 1. London: Hogarth Press, Repr. London: Karnac, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1936). Weaning. In: The Writings of Melanie Klein Vol 1, 290–368. London: Hogarth Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1940). Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. In: The Writings of Melanie Klein Vol. 1, 344–69. London: Hogarth Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In: Developments in psychoanalysis. London: Karnac. Repr. 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1957). Envy and gratitude. In: Klein M (1975). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. Khan M, editor. The International Psycho-Analytical Library, 104:1–346. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1961). Narrative of a child analysis: the conduct of the psycho-analysis of children as seen in the treatment of a ten year old boy. The International Psycho-Analytical Library, 55:1–536. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1975). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. Masud M, Khan R, editors. The International Psycho-Analytical Library, 104:1–346. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva J (1984). Revolution in Poetic Language, New York: Columbia UP, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva J (2000). From symbols to flesh: the polymorphous destiny of narration. Int J Psychoanal 81:771–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristeva J (2001). Melanie Klein. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lia Pistiner de Cortinas (2009). The Aesthetic Dimension of the Mind. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J (1997). The theory of seduction and the problem of the other. Int J Psychoanal 78:653–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplanche J, Pontalis JB (1973). The language of psycho-analysis. Nicholson-Smith D, translator. The International Psycho-Analytical Library, 94:1–497. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer D (1986). Studies in extended metapsychology. London: Karnac, 2009 (The Roland Harris Educational Trust).
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer D (1975). Adhesive identification. Contemp Psychoanal 11:289–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden TH (2011). Reading Susan Isaacs: Towards a radically revised theory of thinking. Int J Psychoanal 92:925–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy E (1983). Words and working through. Int J Psychoanal 64:281–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy E (1992). Enclaves and excursions. Int J Psychoanal 73:603–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron R (2001). The unconscious and primal phantasies. Int J Psychoanal 82:583–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick IB (1985). Working through in the countertransference. Int J Psychoanal 66:157–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers N, Trevarthen C (2009). Voices of shared emotion and meaning: Young infants and their mothers in Scotland and Japan. In: Malloch S, Trevarthen C, editors. Communicative musicality, 210–40. New York: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Quinodoz JM (2008). Listening to Hanna Segal. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Racker H (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanal Q 26:303–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld H (1983). Primitive object relations and mechanisms. Int J Psychoanal 64:261–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld H (2001). The relationship between psychosomatic symptoms and latent psychotic states. In: de Masi F, editor. Herbert Rosenfeld at work: The Italian seminars, 24–44. London Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Salomonsson B (2007). “Talk to me baby, tell me what’s the matter now”: Semiotic and developmental perspectives on communication in psychoanalytic infant treatment. Int J Psychoanal 88:127–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler J (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int J Psychoanal 3:43–7.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1952). A psychoanalytical approach to aesthetics. Int J Psychoanal 33:196–207. Repr. In The Work of Hanna Segal, 185–206. London: Jason Aronson.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal H (1964a). Symposium on fantasy: Fantasy and other mental processes. Int J Psychoanal 45:191–4.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1964b). Phantasy and other processes. In: The Work of Hanna Segal, 41–7. Northvale: Jason Aronson, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1964c). Introduction to the Work of Melanie Klein. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1990). What is an object? The role of perception. Psychoanalysis in Europe, Bulletin 35:113–22.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1994). Phantasy and reality. Int J Psychoanal 75:395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal H (2001). Le genie feminin: Volume II – Melanie Klein: Julia Kristeva. Paris: Fayard. 2000. Int J Psychoanal 82:401–5.
   Google Scholar
• Spillius EB (1994). Developments in Kleinian thought. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 14(3):324–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillius EB (2001). Freud and Klein on the concept of phantasy. In: Bronstein C, editor. Kleinian theory: A contemporary perspective, 17–31. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner R (2003). Introduction. In: Steiner R, editor. Unconscious phantasy, 2–66. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Strachey J (1957). Editor’s note to instincts and their vicissitudes. SE 14:111–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stern DN (1974). Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal and gaze behaviours. In: Lewis M, Rosenbum LA, editors. The effect of the infant on its caregiver, 187–213. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen C (1986). Form, significance and psychological potential of hand gestures of infants. In: Nespoulous J-L, Perron P, Lecours AR, editors. The biological foundation of gestures: Motor and semiotic aspects, 149–202. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen C (1993). The function of emotions in early infant communication and development. In: Nadel J, Camaioni L, editors. New perspectives in early communicative development, 48–81. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar