Evaluando a los postulantes con una versión adaptada del esquema australiano sobre la competencia del candidato

Referencias

• Benedek T (1976). Chicago selection research. Annu Psychoanal 4:333–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cabaniss DL (2008). Becoming a school: Developing learning objectives for psychoanalytic education. Psychoanal Inq 28:262–77. doi: 10.1080/07351690801960814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filet B, Szönyi G (2009). Do psychoanalytic competencies have specific features? Results of a pilot study. Int J Psychother 13:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming J (1961). What analytic work requires of an analyst: A job analysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 9:719–29. doi: 10.1177/000306516100900408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J (1976). Chicago selection research: The group interview. Annu. Psychoanal 4:347–73.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda P (2011). A virtual training institute in Eastern Europe. Int J Psychoanal 92:675–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00461.x
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1933). Explanations and applications. SE 22:136–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach A, Hooke MT, Varvin S, editors (2013). Psychoanalysis in Asia, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre P (1961). A critical digest of the literature on selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. Psychoanal Q 30:28–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenson RR (1961). The selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 9:135–45. doi: 10.1177/000306516100900110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern J (2003). The capacity to be an analyst: A contribution from attachment research to the study of candidate selection. Int J Psychoanal 84:1605–22. doi: 10.1516/KXJV-LR14-HL50-00GN
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann P (1954). Problems of the training analysis. Int J Psychoanal 35:163–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman IZ (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process: A dialectical constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooke MT (2012b). The ageing candidate. Will the empty couch become an empty institute? In: Junkers G, editor. The empty couch, 161–70 London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hovarth AO (2005). The therapeutic relationship: Research and theory. Psychother Res 15:3–7. doi: 10.1080/10503300512331339143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelstam KV (2007). Creativity and dialectical phenomena. From dialectical edge to dialectical space. Int J Psychoanal 88:591–607. doi: 10.1516/N79N-NL37-H521-5335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelstam K (2009). The doubting analyst’s facilitation of a creative analytic space. Australasian J Psychother 28:15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Israelstam K (2011). The interactive category schema of candidate competence: An Australian experience. Int J Psychoanal 92:1289–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00437.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapelle W (1996). How useful is selection? Int J Psychoanal 77:1213–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg OF (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. Int J Psychoanal 81:97–120. doi: 10.1516/0020757001599555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite JV (2008). Ideas of influence: The impact of the analyst’s character on the analysis. Psychoanal Q 78:1075–104. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2008.tb00376.x
   Google Scholar
• Kitto SC, Chesters J, Gorbich C (2008). Quality in qualitative research. Med J Aust 188:243–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein HR (1964). Psychoanalysts in training: Selection and evaluation. New York, NY: Columbia Univ., College of Physicians and Surgeons, Psychoanalytic Clinic for Training and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Klockars L, Hooke MT (2010). Ageing of members in the European psychoanalytic societies. Psychoanalysis in Europe. EPF Bulletin 64:265–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut H (1968). The evaluation of applicants for psychoanalytic training. Int J Psychoanal 49:548–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Leeuw PJ (1961). Selection criteria for the training of psychoanalytic students. Int J Psychoanal 43:277–82.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock H (1961). Historical perspectives in the selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. Psychoanal Q 30:481–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock G (1976). Chicago selection research. The selection process and the selector. Ann Psychoanal 4:309–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld H (1987). Impasse and interpretation. London: Tavistock. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis.)
   Google Scholar
• Sachs H (1947). Observations of a training analyst. Psychoanal Q 16:157–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter J (2014). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe EF (1947). The psychoanalyst. Int J Psychoanal 28:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Stone L (1974). The assesment of students’ progress. Ann Psychoanal 2:308–22.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss AS, Corbin J (1998). Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Szecsody I (2003). To become or be made a psychoanalyst. Scand Psychoanal Rev 26:141–50. doi: 10.1080/01062301.2003.10592922
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2005). Does anything go? Towards a framework for the more transparent assessment. Int J Psychoanal 86:31–49. doi: 10.1516/R2U5-XJ37-7DFJ-DD18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein RS (2012). Will psychoanalysis fulfill its promise? Int J Psychoanal 93:377–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss SS, Fleming J (1979). The teaching and learning of the selection process. Annu Psychoanal 7:87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock. [(1996). Reprinted London: Routledge.]
   Google Scholar