La sexualidad y su objeto en la edición de 1905 de Tres ensayos sobre la teoría de la sexualidad de Freud

Referencias

• Blass R (1992). Did Dora have an Oedipus complex? A re-examination of the theoretical context of Freud’s ‘Fragment of an analysis’. Psychoanal Study Child 47:159–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloch I (1902). Beitr€age zur Aetiologie der Psychopathia sexualis. Dresden: Dohrn.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson A (1984). Assault on Freud. London Review of Books 6(12):9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson AI (2001). The emergence of sexuality: Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• De Vleminck J (2013). De schaduw van Ka€ ın. Freuds klinische antropologie van de agressiviteit. Leuven: Universitaire Pers.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis (1918 [1900]). Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 1, London: F.A. Davis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Esterson A (2001). The mythologizing of psychoanalytic history: deception and self-deception in Freud’s accounts of the seduction theory episode. History of Psychiatry 12(1):329–352. doi: 10.1177/0957154X0101204704
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1895). Entwurf einer Wissenschaftlichen Psychologie, Aus den Anfangen der Psychoanalyse. Bonaparte M, Freud A, Kris E, editors. Frankfurt am Main: Fisher Verlag, 297– 384.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S(1900). The interpretation of dreams. SE2.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1905a). Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie. Leipzig: Deuticke.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1905b). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. SE7.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1905c). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. SE8.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1905d). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. SE7.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1906). My views on the part played by sexuality in the aetiology of the neuroses. SE 7.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1908a). On the sexual theories of children. SE 9.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1908b). Creative writers and day-dreaming. SE 9.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1909). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. SE10.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1911). Psychoanalytic remarks on an autobiographically described case of paranoia (Dementia paranoids). SE 12.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1912–1913). Totem and taboo. SE13.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1914). Introduction to narcissism, SE 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1923). The infantile genital organisation. SE 19.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1985). The complete letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887–1904. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Geyskens T (2002). Our original scenes: Freud’s theory of sexuality. Leuven: Leuven UP.
   Google Scholar
• van Haute P (2005). Psychoanalysis and/as philosophy: The anthropological significance of pathology in Freud’s Three essays on the theory of sexuality and in the psychoanalytic tradition. Natureza Humana 7(2):359–374.
   Google Scholar
• van Haute P, Geyskens T (2010). Between disposition, trauma and history. How oedipal was Dora? In: deVleminck J, Dorfman E, editors, Sexuality and psychoanalysis: Philosophical criticisms, 139–154. Leuven: Leuven UP.
   Google Scholar
• van Haute P, Geyskens T (2012). A non-Oedipal psychoanalysis? A clinical anthropology of hysteria in the work of Freud and Lacan. Leuven: Leuven UP.
   Google Scholar
• Jung C (1907). Uber die Psychologie der Dementia Praecox. Ein Versuch. Halle: Verlagsbuchhandlung Carl Marhold.
   Google Scholar
• von Krafft-Ebing R (1886). Psychopathia Sexualis mit besonderer Ber€ucksichtigung der contr€aren Sexualempfindung. Eine klinisch-forensische Studie. Stuttgart: Enke.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J (1987). Nouveaux fondements pour la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Lear J (2005). Freud. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May-Tolzmann U (1998). ‘Obsessional neurosis’: A nosographic innovation by Freud. History of Psychiatry 9(3):335–353. doi: 10.1177/0957154X9800903504
   Google Scholar
• May U (2015). The third step in drive theory: On the genesis of Beyond the pleasure principle. Psychoanalysis and History 17(2):205–272. doi: 10.3366/pah.2015.0170
   Google Scholar
• Micale M (1993). On the ‘disappearance’ of hysteria: A study in the clinical deconstruction of a diagnosis. Isis 84(3):496–526. doi: 10.1086/356549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll A (1898). Untersuchungen €uber die Libido sexualis, vol 1. Berlin: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhuis H (2000). Stepchildren of nature: Krafft-Ebing, psychiatry, and the making of sexual identity. Chicago: Chicago UP.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhuis H (2012). Sexual modernity in the works of Richard von Krafft-Ebing and Albert Moll. Medical History 56(2):133–155. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2011.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudinesco E (2014). Sigmund Freud en son temps et dans le n^otre. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Sulloway F (1979). Freud: Biologist of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Westerink H (2009). A dark trace: Sigmund Freud on the sense of guilt. Leuven: Leuven UP.
   Google Scholar