Top incomes and the ruling class in Latin American history. Some theoretical and methodological challenges

References

• Aaron, Henry J. 1978. Politics and the Professors: The Great Society in Perspective. Washington: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, and James A Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Alvaredo, Facundo. 2010. “The Rich in Argentina Over the Twentieth Century: From the Conservative Republic to the Peronist Experience and Beyond 1932-2004.” In Top Incomes. A Global Perspective, edited by Anthony Atkinson, and Thomas Piketty, 253–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Astorga, Pablo. 2021. Revealing the diversity and complexity behind long-term income inequality in Latin America: a new dataset, 1920-2011. Working Papers in Economic History 21-11. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
   Google Scholar
• Astorga, Pablo, and Leticia Arroyo Abad. 2016. “Latin American Earnings Inequality in the Long run.” Cliometrica 11 (3): 349–374. doi:10.1007/s11698-016-0150-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Anthony. 1997. “Bringing Income Distribution in from the Cold.” The Economic Journal 107 (441): 297–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Anthony. 2015. Inequality: What Can be Done? Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Anthony, and Thomas Piketty. 2007. Top Incomes Over the Twentieth Century a Contrast Between Continental European and English-Speaking Countries. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Anthony, and Thomas Piketty. 2010. Top Incomes a Global Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis. 2005. “A 50 años de la curva de Kuznets: Crecimiento económico y distribución del ingreso en Uruguay y otras economías de nuevo asentamiento desde 1870.” Investigaciones de Historia Económica 1 (3): 135–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1698-6989(05)70022-9.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis. 2017. “Looking at Piketty from the Periphery.” In The Contradictions of Capital in the Twenty-First Century: The Piketty Opportunity, edited by P. Hudson, and K. Tribe, 195–207. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis, Cecilia Castelnovo, Eustáquio Reis, and Henry Willebald. 2006. “An Exploration Into the Distribution of Income in Brazil, 1839–1939.” Paper presented at the XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki-Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis, Cecilia Castelnovo, Javier Rodríguez Weber, and Henry Willebald. 2010. “Between the Colonial Heritage and the First Globalization Boom: On Income Inequality in the Southern Cone.” Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History 28 (02): 307–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S021261091000011X.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis, and José A Ocampo. 2012. The Economic Development of Latin America Since Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis, and José A. Ocampo. 2013. El desarrollo económico de América Latina desde la Independencia. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis, and Javier Rodríguez Weber. 2016. “Latin American Economic History. Looking Backwards for the Future.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Economic History, edited by F. Boldizzoni, and P. Hudson, 329–342. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis, and Jeffrey G Williamson. 2017. Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction? Looking Over the Long Run. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Burdín, Gabriel, Fernando Esponda, and Andrea Vigorito. 2014. Desigualdad y altos ingresos en Uruguay. Un análisis en base a registros tributarios y encuestas de hogares para el período 2009-2011. Serie Documentos de Trabajo / FCEA-IE; DT06/14. Universidad de la República, Instituto de Economía.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, Fernando H., and Enzo Faletto. 1969. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina; Ensayo de interpretación sociológica. México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, J. I. 2007. Renta agraria, ganancia industrial y deuda externa; 1882-2004. Buenos Aires: Imago Mundi.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Ruth B., and David Collier. 2002. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conniff, Michael L. 1985. Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conniff, Michael L. 2012. Populism in Latin America. Tuscaloosa, Ala: University Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dornbusch, Robert, and Sebastián Edwards, eds. 1991. Macroeconomic Populism in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, Ignacio, Claudia Sanhueza, Jorge Atria, and Ricardo Mayer. 2020. “Top Incomes in Chile: A Historical Perspective on Income Inequality, 1964-2017.” Review of Income and Wealth 66 (4): 850–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germani, Gino, Torcuato Di Tella, and Octavio Ianni. 1973. Populismo y contradicciones de clase en Latinoamérica. México: Era.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez León, María. 2021. “The Kuznets Curve in Brazil, 1850-2010.” Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History 39 (1): 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0212610920000166.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-León, María, and Herman de Jong. 2019. “Inequality in Turbulent Times: Income Distribution in Germany and Britain,1900-50.” Economic History Review 72 (3): 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2013. Varieties of Capitalism: Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2002. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppit, Julian. 1996. “Political Arithmetic in Eighteenth-Century England.” The Economic History Review 49 (3): 516–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2597762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Herbert S. 2017. “The Historical Turn in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 48 (3): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1162/JINH_a_01159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 1975. “Modos de producción, sistemas económicos y población excedente. Aproximación histórica a los casos argentino y chileno.” In El régimen oligárquico. Materiales para el estudio de la realidad argentina (hasta 1930), edited by M. Giménez Zapiola, 19–57. Buenos Aires: Amorrutu editores.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Frank, and Peter Temin. 2011. “Inequality and Institutions in Twentieth-Century America.” In Economic Evolution and Revolution in Historical Time, edited by Paul W. Rodhe, Joshua L. Rosenbloom, and David F. Weiman, 357–386. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindert, Peter H., and Jeoffrey G Williamson. 1982. “Revising England's Social Tables 1688-1812.” Explorations in Economic History 19 (4): 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(82)90009-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindert, Peter H., and Jeffrey G Williamson. 1983. “Reinterpreting Britain's Social Tables, 1688-1913.” Explorations in Economic History 20 (1): 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(83)90044-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindert, Peter H., and Jeffrey G Williamson. 2016. Unequal Gains: American Growth and Inequality Since 1700. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Londoño, Juan Luis. 1995. Distribución del ingreso y desarrollo económico: Colombia en el siglo XX. Bogotá: TM Editores - Fedesarrollo - Banco de la República.
   Google Scholar
• Londoño Vélez, Juliana. 2012. Income and Wealth at the Top in Colombia: An Exploration of Tax Records 1993-2010. (Master Thesis). Paris School of Economics, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1972. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Terrence. J. 2005. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Branko. 2006. “An Estimate of Average Income and Inequality in Byzantium Around Year 1000.” The Review of Income and Wealth 52 (3): 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00198.x.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Branko. 2015. “The Level and Distribution of Income in mid- Eighteenth-Century France, According to François Quesnay.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37 (1): 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837214000728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2001. Les hauts revenus en France au XXe siècle: inégalités et redistributions, 1901-1998. Paris: Grasset.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty First Century. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2015. “Putting Distribution Back at the Center of Economics: Reflections on “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1): 67–88. DOI: 10.1257/jep.29.1.67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2019. Capital e ideología. Barcelona: Deusto.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, Aníbal. 1959. Chile, un caso de desarrollo frustrado. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, Aníbal. 1976. “Styles of Development in Latin America.” CEPAL Review 1976 (1): 99–130.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, Aníbal. 2008. “Notas sobre los estilos de desarrollo en América Latina.” Revista de la CEPAL 96: 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, Raúl. 1963. Hacia una dinámica del desarrollo latinoamericano. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, Raúl. 1981. Capitalismo periférico: crisis y transformación. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, James. 2007. “¿Un típico país latinoamericano? Una perspectiva sobre el desarrollo.” In Economía colombiana del siglo XX, edited by James Robinson and Miguel Urrutia, 639–673. Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, Octavio. 2006. El estructuralismo latinoamericano. México: Siglo XXI: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, Javier. 2014. “La economía pública de la distribución del ingreso en Chile, 1850-2009”. PhD diss., Universidad de la República, Montevideo. Retrieved from http://cienciassociales.edu.uy/unidadmultidisciplinaria/?p = 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, Javier. 2015. “Estimación de desigualdad de ingreso y otras variables relacionadas para Chile entre 1860 y 1970. Metodología y resultados obtenidos”. MPRA Working Paper N° 68400.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, Javier. 2017a. Desarrollo y desigualdad en Chile (1850-2009). Historia de su economía política. Santiago: DIBAM-Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, Javier. 2017b. “La erosión del poder de la élite en chile entre 1913 y 1970. Una aproximación desde los ingresos del 1%.” Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History 35 (1): 49–80. doi:10.1017/S0212610916000173.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, Javier. 2018. “Alta Desigualdad en América Latina: desde cuándo y por qué”. Documento de trabajo N° 51. Programa de Historia Económica y Social, Universidad de la República.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, Javier. 2022. “Altos ingresos, recursos naturales y populismo. La desigualdad en Colombia en el espejo latinoamericano (1938-1988).” Investigaciones de Historia Económica / Economic History Research (IHE-EHR) 18 (3): 195–205. doi:10.33231/j.ihe.2022.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, Jeffrey D. 1990. “Social conflict and populist policies in Latin America.” International Center for Economic Growth. Occasional Papers N° 9.
   Google Scholar
• Santilli, Daniel. 2019. La desigualdad en la Argentina. Apuntes para su historia, de la colonia a nuestros días. Rosario: Prohistoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ancochea, Diego. 2021. “All About Ideology? Reading Pikettýs with Latin American Lenses.” The British Journal of Sociology 72 (1): 125–138. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, Thomas E. 1978. A Case Study in Comparative Public Policy: The Economic Dimensions of Populism in Argentina and Brazil. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Latin American Program - Working papers N° 3.
   Google Scholar
• Soto Cárdenas, Alejandro. 1998. Influencia británica en el salitre: origen, naturaleza y decadencia. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universidad de Santiago.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, Pedro. H. G. F. 2018. Uma história de desigualdade: a concentração de renda entre os ricos, 1926-2013. São Paulo: Hucitec Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2013. The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endagers our Future. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sunkel, Octavio, and Pedro Paz. 1970. El subdesarrollo latinoamericano y la teoría del desarrollo. México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Temin, Peter. 2018. The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy. Cambridge; London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urrutia, Miguel. 1991. “On the Absence of Economic Populism in Colombia.” In Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, edited by Rudiger Dornbusch, and Sebastian Edwards, 369–391. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar