REFERENCES
- Greening SE. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited. Diagn Cytopathol 1985; 1: 558.
- Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Brink AL, Du Toit JP, Deale CJ. In search of more representative cervical cytology. A preliminary prospective study. S Afr Med J 1989; 76(2): 55–7.
- Buntinx, Knottnerus J, Crebolder H, Seegers T, Essed G, Schouten H. Does feed-back improve the quality of cervical smears? A randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 1993; 43: 194–8.
- Vooijs GP, Elias A, Van der Graaf Y, Poelen-Van der Berg M. The influence of sample takers on the cellular composition of cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 251–7.
- Department of Health. National Guidelines for Cervical Screening Programme. Pretoria: DOH.
- Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Es- sed GG. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(1): 64–8.
- Luzzatto R, Boon ME. Contribution of the endocervical Cytobrush sample to the diagnosis of cervical lesions. Acta Cytol 1996; 40(6): 1143–7.
- Editorial Cervical Sampling Devices. BMJ 1996; 313: 1275–6.
- Newkirk GR. Pap smear and related techniques for cervical cancer screening. In: Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, eds. Procedures for Primary Care. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 1145–58.
- Eisenberger D, Hernandez E, Tener T, Atkinson BF. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90(5): 755–8.
- Quackenbush SR. Single-slide Pap smear: an acceptable alternative to the double-slide Pap smear. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20(5): 317–20.
- Saitas VL, Hawthorne C, Cater J, Bibbo M. Single-slide versus double-slide Pap smear: a comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 12(4): 320–2.